Strategies to reduce transplant-related mortality after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in elderly patients: Comparison of reduced-intensity conditioning and unmanipulated peripheral blood stem cells vs a myeloablative regimen and CD34+ cell selection

Abstract Increasing number of patients in China have difficulty of finding sibling donors due to limited number of siblings. We therefore explored the feasibility using haploidentical parent donors for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Eight leukemia patients were studied in our hospital. These included 2 CML-BC, 2 MDS-RAEB, 3 relapsed ALL and 1 relapsed AML. The median age was 12 (7–17). GCSF- mobilized bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cells were collected from parents (1 to 3 locus mismatched). The conditioning regimen consisted of fludarabine (30mg/m2/d x5), bulsulfan (4mg/kg/d x3) and cyclophosphamide (50mg/kg/d x2). Cyclosporin A, mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, and ATG were used for GVHD prophylaxis. The total number of CD34+ cell in the grafts ranged between 5–10 x 106/kg. The median follow- up was 13 months (6–24). One patient failed to engraft, the other 7 patients achieved full donor chimerism at day 28. The incidence of acute GVHD (grade II-IV) was 57.1% (4 of 7). The incidence of chronic GVHD of limited stage occurred in the same 4 patients. One patient died of lung complication at 17th month, another patient with CML-BC relapsed 10 months after transplantation. The rest 6 patients are alive without disease. These results suggested that parents could be considered as stem cell donors in the absence of alternative donors for young patients with high-risk diseases. GCSF-primed bone marrow plus peripheral blood stem cells might be beneficial to reduce the risk of GVHD for leukemia children in China. More patients are needed to further study this approach.

Download Full-text

Ex-Vivo Expanded Peripheral Blood Stem Cells (EVEC) Compared with Un Manipulated Peripheral Blood Stem Cells (PBSC) Autologous Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: A Pair Match Analysis.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.502.502 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 502-502 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Noel-Jean Milpied ◽

Gerald Marit ◽

Bernard Dazey ◽

Jean-Michel Boiron ◽

Zoran Ivanovic ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cells ◽

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Ex Vivo ◽

High Dose ◽

Peripheral Blood Stem Cells ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Blood Stem Cells

Abstract Abstract 502 Autologous stem cell transplantation with PBSC after high-dose chemotherapy remains standard therapy for patients with symptomatic Multiple Myeloma (MM). Strategies to minimize complications could significantly reduce the morbidity of that procedure. One possibility could be to shorten the duration of induced neutropenia through the injection of an ex-vivo expanded graft. Nineteen patients (pts) received EVEC after high-dose Melphalan (HDM) (200 mg/m2) as the only graft. The ex-vivo expanded procedure has been described elsewhere (Boiron et al. Transfusion 2006 and Ivanovic et al. Transfusion 2006). Briefly, thawed peripheral blood CD 34+ cells collected after G-CSF mobilisation and selected with immunomagnetic devices were incubated for 10 days in a serum free medium (Maco Biotech HP01) with Stem Cell Factor (Amgen), G-CSF (Amgen) and TPO (Amgen: 7 pts; Cellgenix:12 pts). The expanded cells were then thoroughly washed and injected 48h after the HDM injection. The ex-vivo expansion lead to a median fold of 5,4 for CD34+ cells (1,3-11,8); 118 for CD33+ (1-703880); 3386 for CD14+ (4-101075); 28,5 for CD13+ (10-703880) and 13 for CFUs (6-21). The median N° of CD34+ cells injected was 14×10e6/kg (5,3-48). The results of these transplants were compared to those achieved in 38 pts who received unmanipulated PBSC after HDM. Pts and controls were matched for age, sex, stage of the disease, first line chemotherapy ( VAD or VD) status of the disease at time of transplant, year of transplant, time between diagnosis and transplant, CD34+ mobilisation technique (HD cytoxan + G-CSF or G-CSF alone) and the median N° of total nucleated cells and of CD34+ collected. The results are summarized on the table: There was no secondary neutropenia in the patients who received EVEC. With a median FU of the entire cohort of 30 m, the median OS for pts who received their first transplant with EVEC and with PBSC is 69 m and not reached respectively (p=NS), the median PFS is 18 m and 27 m (p = NS) and the median time to progression is 14 m and 15 m (p=NS). Conclusion: EVEC is feasible, safe and reduce significantly the morbidity of autologous stem cell transplantation after HDM for multiple myeloma. Disclosures: Milpied: Amgen France: Honoraria.

Download Full-text