Acute and Chronic Graft-Versus-Host-Disease – A Focus on Pediatric Patients

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), either in its acute or chronic form, is the main contributory factor for morbidity and non-relapse mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Recent advancements in the classification of this disease, with better applicability and reproducibility of standardized criteria, coupled with improvements in the management of steroid-refractory or resistant cases, have led to promising results. In 2020, the Brazilian Group for Pediatric Bone Marrow Transplantation of the Brazilian Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SBTMO) convened a task force to provide updated, evidence-based guidance for the diagnosis, classification, staging, prophylaxis, and treatment of GVHD, with a focus on the pediatric population, the results of which are presented here.

HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION IN CHILDREN WITH HEMOGLOBINOPATHIES: BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION CONSENSUS

THE BRAZILIAN SOCIETY FOR BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION (SBTMO) PRESENTS THE BRAZILIAN GUIDELINES ON HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION FOR CHILDREN WITH HEMOGLOBINOPATHIES

Mobility and Muscle Strength in Recipients of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Sickle Cell Disease: A Preliminary Report from Sickle Transplant Evaluation of Longterm and Late Effects Registry (STELLaR)

Introduction Recipients of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) are at risk for treatment related late effects including cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Physical fitness including mobility and muscle strength are important predictors of cardiovascular health and quality of life. Physical fitness has been described in children and adults who are long term survivors of HCT for malignant disease [1]. Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) are likely to be subject to unique morbidity post-HCT as a consequence of the pathophysiology of SCD which is characterized by anemia, inflammation, pain, bone infarcts and neurological complications. A systematic assessment of physical fitness is required to understand some of the long-term outcomes HCT for SCD. Methods We enrolled patients with SCD ≥ 1-year post-HCT in Sickle Transplantation Evaluating Long Term And Late Effects Registry (STELLaR). We assessed physical fitness including mobility using the timed up and go (TUG) test, and muscle strength using the handgrip strength (HGS) test. TUG scores were compared with published normative data for children (mean 9.2s; SD = 0.8) and young adults (mean 10.5s, SD = 1.1) [2]. TUG scores ≥ mean+ 2SD were considered abnormal (children: ≥10.8s, young adults ≥12.7s). The HGS of each patient was compared to published normative data of children and adults [3,4]. Patients ≤12 years were abnormal if they had a HGS of two standard deviations below the mean. Patients ≥13 years were considered abnormal if they had a HGS lower than the lower limit of the 85% age-sex standard. Additionally, patients were also assessed for chronic graft versus host disease (cGvHD) by means of the Lee Chronic GvHD Symptom Scale [5]. Patients rated their extent of being bothered by cGvHD symptoms on a scale from 1 to 5, with 1 being not at all and 5 being extremely. These scores were then organized into 7 categories of cGVHD symptoms and normalized to a 0-100 scale. We report the results of an interim analysis of physical fitness in these HCT recipients. Results Out of 121 patients enrolled in the study, 37 HCT recipients were assessed for mobility using the TUG test, and for muscle strength using the HGS test. Children were defined as being below the age of 18 and young adults between 18 and 40 years of age. Patient demographic and clinical results for TUG and HGS are presented in Table 1. Young adult participants were more likely to have abnormal TUG and HGS results than pediatric study participants. Patient self-reporting of overall (summary) cGvHD symptoms was found to be statistically significant between children and young adults (p=0.037) with young adults iappearing to be slightly more bothered by GvHD symptoms. There was no correlation in length of time in years between a patient's transplant and whether or not there was abnormal physical fitness (TUG and HGS) for both the young adult and children cohorts. Conclusions These data suggest the existence of impaired physical fitness in the long term in SCD patients who are HCT recipients. They provide the rationale for systematic evaluation of physical fitness and other risk factors for cardiovascular disease post-HCT. References 1. Slater, M. E., Steinberger, J., Ross, J. A., Kelly, A. S., Chow, E. J., Koves, I. H., ... & Baker, K. S. (2015). Physical activity, fitness, and cardiometabolic risk factors in adult survivors of childhood cancer with a history of hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 21(7), 1278-1283. 2. Mangano, G. R., Valle, M. S., Casabona, A., Vagnini, A., & Cioni, M. (2020). Age-related changes in mobility evaluated by the timed up and go test instrumented through a single sensor. Sensors, 20(3), 719. 3. Omar, M. T., Alghadir, A. H., Zafar, H., & Al Baker, S. (2018). Hand grip strength and dexterity function in children aged 6-12 years: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Hand Therapy, 31(1), 93-101. 4. Webb, A. R., Newman, L. A., Taylor, M., & Keogh, J. B. (1989). Hand grip dynamometry as a predictor of postoperative complications reappraisal using age standardized grip strengths. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 13(1), 30-33. 5. Lee, S. J., Cook, E. F., Soiffer, R., & Antin, J. H. (2002). Development and validation of a scale to measure symptoms of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 8(8), 444-452 Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Guilcher: BlueBirdBio: Research Funding; Project Sickle Cure Study: Other: Principal Investigator, Research Funding.

Outcome of Human Umbilical Cord Blood Stem Cell Transplantation (CBT) for Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Patients Achieving First Complete Remission after One Versus Two Induction Courses: A Study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)

Background: Achieving a first complete remission (CR1) is an important prognostic factor for transplantation outcome. However, there are no data in the setting of cord blood transplantation (CBT) indicating whether the number of induction courses (1 or 2) needed to achieve CR1, is of prognostic significance. As CBT is advantageous for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) patients (pts) with positive pre transplant measurable residual disease (MRD) (Milano F, NEJM 2016), it is conceivable that in the CBT setting, no difference in transplantation outcome will be observed between pts achieving CR1 after 1 or 2 inductions. Methods: Using the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)/Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP) registry, we compared transplantation outcomes of adult pts aged ≥18 years with AML that underwent CBT in 2005-2020 in CR1, achieved following 1 versus (vs) 2 induction courses. Multivariate analysis (MVA) adjusting for differences between the induction groups was performed using a Cox's proportional-hazards regression model for main outcomes. Results: Three hundred and twenty-five pts were included comprising 243 (75%) with 1 and 82 (25%) with 2 induction chemotherapy courses. Median (range) follow-up was 65.4 (57.4-73.5) and 51.0 (34.8-61.5) months, respectively (p=0.6). Median age was 49.4 (19.0-70.9) and 52.1 (19.2-71.5) years (p=0.8), respectively. For patients with 1 and 2 induction courses, respectively, 49.4% and 57.3% were male, 225 (92.6%) and 78 (95.1%) pts had de novo AML, and 18 (7.4%) and 4 (4.9%) had secondary AML (p=0.6). Pts with 1 and 2 induction courses, respectively, were classified by cytogenetic risk as follows: intermediate, 62.0% and 79.2%, adverse, 33.2% and 19.5%, and favorable, 4.8% and 1.3% (p=0.02) (missing data~25%). The FLT3-ITD mutation was harbored by 33.7% and 32.3% of the pts (p=0.8), respectively (missing data ~6%). Conditioning was myeloablative (MAC) in 43.0% and 36.6% and reduced intensity (RIC) in 57.0% and 63.4%, respectively (p=0.31). Karnofsky performance score (KPS) was > 90 in 74.7% and 71% of the pts, respectively (p=0.5). The most frequent anti-graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was cyclosporin A (CSA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in 75.6% and 82.5 %, or CSA with or without steroids in 16.1 % and 11.2%, respectively. Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) was administered to 32.9% and 25.6% of the CBT recipients, respectively (p=0.2). Engraftment rates were lower for pts achieving CR1 after 1 vs 2 induction courses (91.3% and 98.8% p=0.02) with corresponding day 60 absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 0.5 x 10 9/L in 89.6% vs 96.3% of the pts (p=0.03). Day 180 incidence of acute GVHD grades II-IV was similar in both induction groups, 38.3% and 37.2% (p=0.8), as was 2-year total chronic GVHD, 23.4% and 27.5 %, respectively (p=0.6). In univariate analysis, the 2--year non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse incidence (RI), leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS) and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) were similar between patients achieving CR1 with 1 vs 2 induction courses with 22.6% vs 23.6% (p=0.87) 25.1% vs 30.4% (p=0.4), 52.3% vs 46.0% (p=0.3), 58.6% vs 50.0% (p=0.2), and 44% vs 44.1% (p=0.66), respectively. Similarly in MVA, there was no significant association between 2 courses of induction and NRM (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.1; 95% CI, 0.6-1.8, p=0.7), RI (HR = 1.4; 95% CI, 0.9-2.3, p=0.1), LFS (HR = 1.3; 95% CI, 0.9-1.8, p=0.2), OS (HR = 1.3; 95% CI, 0.9-1.9, p=0.1), and GRFS (HR = 1.1; 95% CI, 0.8-1.5, p=0.5). Conclusions: In CBT recipients, we did not find any significant differences in outcomes in patients achieving CR1 after one or two induction courses. Notably, engraftment was better in patients receiving two courses of induction chemotherapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Labopin: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Forcade: Novartis: Other: travel grant. Sierra: Amgen: Other: Educational grant; Roche: Other: Educational grant; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Other: Educational grant; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Educational grant; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Byrne: Incyte: Honoraria. Blaise: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Mohty: Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria.