The Cardiac Surgery Advanced Life Support Course (CALS): Delivering Significant Improvements in Emergency Cardiothoracic Care

2007 ◽  
Vol 2007 ◽  
pp. 147-148
Author(s):  
E.A. Martinez
BMJ ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 331 (7524) ◽  
pp. s200-s201
Author(s):  
Joel Dunning

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheryl Herrmann

Cardiac arrest in the immediate postoperative recovery period in a patient who underwent cardiac surgery is typically related to reversible causes—tamponade, bleeding, ventricular arrhythmias, or heart blocks associated with conduction problems. When treated promptly, 17% to 79% of patients who experience cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery survive to discharge. The Cardiac Advanced Life Support–Surgical (CALS-S) guideline provides a standardized algorithm approach to resuscitation of patients who experience cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery. The purpose of this article is to discuss the CALS-S guideline and how to implement it.


2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
pp. 177-177
Author(s):  
Lauren Espeso ◽  
Timothy Meyenburg ◽  
Richard Bell ◽  
Daniel Herr

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. S6-S7
Author(s):  
J. De Bono ◽  
E. Delaney ◽  
L. Emmett ◽  
D. Florisson ◽  
M. Ghani ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 30-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Jill Ley

Of the 250 000 patients who undergo major cardiac operations in the United States annually, 0.7% to 2.9% will experience a postoperative cardiac arrest. Although Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) is the standard approach to management of cardiac arrest in the United States, it has significant limitations in these patients. The European Resuscitation Council (ERC) has endorsed a new guideline specific to resuscitation after cardiac surgery that advises important, evidence-based deviations from ACLS and is under consideration in the United States. The ACLS and ERC recommendations for resuscitation of these patients are contrasted on the basis of the essential components of care. Key to this approach is the rapid elimination of reversible causes of arrest, followed by either defibrillation or pacing (as appropriate) before external cardiac compressions that can damage the sternotomy, cautious use of epinephrine owing to potential rebound hypertension, and prompt resternotomy (within 5 minutes) to promote optimal cerebral perfusion with internal massage, if prior interventions are unsuccessful. These techniques are relatively simple, reproducible, and easily mastered in Cardiac Surgical Unit–Advanced Life Support courses. Resuscitation of patients after heart surgery presents a unique opportunity to achieve high survival rates with key modifications to ACLS that warrant adoption in the United States.


2006 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. 1767-1772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel Dunning ◽  
Jay Nandi ◽  
Sharil Ariffin ◽  
John Jerstice ◽  
Deborah Danitsch ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 54-61
Author(s):  
Bhargavi Gali ◽  
◽  
Grace Arteaga ◽  
Glen Au ◽  
Vitaly Herasevich

Background: Advanced life support interventions have been modified for patients who have recently undergone sternotomy for cardiac surgery and have new suture lines. We aimed to determine whether the use of in-situ simulation increased adherence to the cardiac surgery unit-advanced life support algorithm (CSU-ALS) for patients with cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery (CAACS). Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of cardiac arrest management of patients who sustained CAACS before and after implementation of in-situ simulation scenarios utilizing CSU-ACLS in place of traditional advanced cardiac life support. We utilized classroom education of CSU-ACLS followed by in-situ high-fidelity simulated scenarios of patients with CAACS.. Interprofessional learners (n = 210) participated in 18 in-situ simulations of CAACS. Two groups of patients with CAACS were retrospectively compared before and after in situ training (preimplementation, n=22 vs postimplementation, n=38). Outcomes included adherence to CSU-ALS for resuscitation, delay in initiation of chest compressions, use of defibrillation and pacing before external cardiac massage, and time to initial medication. Results: Chest compressions were used less often in the postimplementation vs the preimplementation period (11/22 [29%] vs 13/38 [59%], P = 0.02). Time to initial medication administration, use of defibrillation and pacing, return to the operating room, and survival were similar between periods. Conclusion: In this pilot, adherence to a key component of the CSU-ALS algorithm—delaying initiation of chest compressions—improved


Author(s):  
Osama Sefein ◽  
Jeff Granton ◽  
Dave Nagpal ◽  
Cheryl Kee ◽  
Jian Ray Zhou

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document