scholarly journals Baseline serum creatinine level strongly predicts risk of precedural failure of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: Results from the Japanese Multicenter AMI registry (JAMI)

2003 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 384
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Koganei ◽  
Hiroshi Kasanuki ◽  
Hirotaka Kimura ◽  
Yasuhiro Ishii ◽  
Yukio Tsurumi ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 739-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johann Auer ◽  
Frederik H Verbrugge ◽  
Gudrun Lamm

Acute kidney injury (AKI), mostly defined as a rise in serum creatinine concentration of more than 0.5 mg/dl, is a common, serious, and potentially preventable complication of percutaneous coronary intervention and is associated with adverse outcomes including an increased risk of inhospital mortality. Recent data from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry/Cath-PCI registry including 985,737 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention suggest that approximately 7% experienced AKI with a reported incidence of 3–19%. In patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), AKI occurs more frequently with rates up to 20% depending on patient and procedural characteristics. However, varying definitions of AKI limit comparisons of AKI rates across different studies. Recently, most studies have adopted the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria for definition and classification of AKI. Beyond the AKIN criteria for AKI, other classifications such as the risk, injury, failure, loss and end-stage kidney disease (RIFLE) and kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) criteria are used to define AKI. Notably, even small increases in serum creatinine beyond AKI may be associated with adverse outcomes including increased hospital length of stay and excess. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a serious and potentially preventable complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Worsening renal function is associated with adverse outcomes including a higher rate of in-hospital mortality. In patients undergoing primary PCI for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), AKI occurs up to 20% of such individuals. Varying definitions of AKI limit comparisons of AKI rates across different studies. Additionally, even small increases in serum creatinine beyond lavels meeting AKI definitions may be associated with adverse outcomes including increased hospital length of stay.


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-158
Author(s):  
AHM Waliul Islam ◽  
Shams Munwar ◽  
Azfar H Bhuiyan ◽  
Sahabuddin Talukder ◽  
AQM Reza ◽  
...  

Background: The changes in serum creatinine level after Percutaneous coronary Intervention has been reported by different authors.Methods: Total 87 (Male71: Female 16) patients were enrolled in this very preliminary study who underwent elective PCI and has normal serum creatinine level. Total 116 stents were deployed in 108 territories. Mean age for both male : female were (55: 58) yrs. Associated CAD risk factors were Dyslipidemia, High Blood pressure, Diabetes Mellitus, Positive FH for CAD and Smoking (all male).Results: Among the study group; 65(74.3%) were Dyslipidemic, 74(85%) were hypertensive; 52(58%) patients were Diabetic, FH 12(13.8%), Hypothyroid 3(3.4%) and 30(42.3%) were all male smoker. Female patients were more obese (BMI: M 25: F 28). Average uses of contrast material was 81 ml. Serum Creatinine level was pre-procedural male: female (1.35: 1.44) and post-procedural 2nd day for male: female were (1.24: 1.45). Common stented territory was LAD 48(44.4%), RCA 41(38%), and LCX 19(17.6%). Stent used were all DES. Among them, Everolimus eluting stents 69 (70.4%), Sirolimus Eluting stents 22(22.4%) and Biolimus Eluting stents 7 (7.1%).Conclusion: In the current prospective non randomized study, we found that the cautious injection of Iodinated contrast doesn’t change post procedural s. creatinine level at 2nd day-of PCI.Cardiovasc. j. 2017; 9(2): 155-158


2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zuzana Kaifoszova ◽  
Petr Widimsky ◽  
◽  

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is recommended by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) treatment guidelines as the preferred treatment for ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) whenever it is available within 90–120 minutes of the first medical contact. A survey conducted in 2008 in 51 ESC countries found that the annual incidence of hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction is around 1,900 patients per million population, with an incidence of STEMI of about 800 per million. It showed that STEMI patients’ access to reperfusion therapy and the use of PPCI or thrombolysis (TL) vary considerably between countries. Northern, western and central Europe already have well-developed PPCI services, offering PPCI to 60–90 % of all STEMI patients. Southern Europe and the Balkans are still predominantly using TL. Where this is the case, a higher proportion of patients are left without any reperfusion treatment. The survey concluded that a nationwide PPCI strategy results in more patients being offered reperfusion therapy. To address the inequalities in STEMI patients’ access to life-saving PPCI, and to support the implementation of the ESC STEMI treatment guidelines in Europe, the Stent for Life (SFL) Initiative was launched jointly by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) and EuroPCR in 2008. National cardiac societies from Bulgaria, France, Greece, Serbia, Spain and Turkey signed the SFL Declaration at the ESC Congress in Barcelona in 2009. The aim of the SFL Initiative is to improve the delivery of, and STEMI patients’ access to, life-saving PPCI and thereby reduce mortality and morbidity. Currently, 10 national cardiac societies support the SFL Initiative in their respective countries. SFL national action programmes have been developed and are being implemented in several countries. The formation of regional PPCI networks involving emergency medical services, non-percutaneous coronary intervention hospitals and PPCI centres is considered to be a critical success factor in implementing PPCI services effectively. This article describes examples of how SFL countries are progressing in implementing their national programmes, thus increasing PPCI penetration in Europe.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document