scholarly journals TCTAP A-136 Serum Creatinine Level Doesn’t Changed Much at 2nd Day After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI): Amount of Contrast Injected May Be the Key Factor

2016 ◽  
Vol 67 (16) ◽  
pp. S62
Author(s):  
Shams Munwar ◽  
A.H.M. Waliul Islam ◽  
Azfar H. Bhuiyan ◽  
Shahab Uddin Talukder ◽  
A.Q.M. Reza ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-158
Author(s):  
AHM Waliul Islam ◽  
Shams Munwar ◽  
Azfar H Bhuiyan ◽  
Sahabuddin Talukder ◽  
AQM Reza ◽  
...  

Background: The changes in serum creatinine level after Percutaneous coronary Intervention has been reported by different authors.Methods: Total 87 (Male71: Female 16) patients were enrolled in this very preliminary study who underwent elective PCI and has normal serum creatinine level. Total 116 stents were deployed in 108 territories. Mean age for both male : female were (55: 58) yrs. Associated CAD risk factors were Dyslipidemia, High Blood pressure, Diabetes Mellitus, Positive FH for CAD and Smoking (all male).Results: Among the study group; 65(74.3%) were Dyslipidemic, 74(85%) were hypertensive; 52(58%) patients were Diabetic, FH 12(13.8%), Hypothyroid 3(3.4%) and 30(42.3%) were all male smoker. Female patients were more obese (BMI: M 25: F 28). Average uses of contrast material was 81 ml. Serum Creatinine level was pre-procedural male: female (1.35: 1.44) and post-procedural 2nd day for male: female were (1.24: 1.45). Common stented territory was LAD 48(44.4%), RCA 41(38%), and LCX 19(17.6%). Stent used were all DES. Among them, Everolimus eluting stents 69 (70.4%), Sirolimus Eluting stents 22(22.4%) and Biolimus Eluting stents 7 (7.1%).Conclusion: In the current prospective non randomized study, we found that the cautious injection of Iodinated contrast doesn’t change post procedural s. creatinine level at 2nd day-of PCI.Cardiovasc. j. 2017; 9(2): 155-158


2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-43
Author(s):  
ABMM Alam ◽  
M Moniruzzaman ◽  
MB Alam ◽  
N Islam ◽  
F Khatoon ◽  
...  

Background: CIN has gained increased attention in the clinical setting, particularly during cardiac intervention but also in many other radiological procedures in which iodinated contrast media are used. There is at present good clinical evidence from well-controlled randomized studies that CIN is a common cause of acute renal dysfunction.Methodology: This was a prospective study conducted among the patients who underwent coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in the Department of Cardiology, Dhaka Medical College Hospital during January 2010 to December 2010. A total of 111 patients age range from 25 to 75 years were included in the study. Serum creatinine level at baseline and at the end of 48 hours was done in all these patients. Study population was divided into two groups according to development of acute kidney injury (AKI). Group-I = AKI, Group II = Not developed AKI. Results: AKI developed 11.7% of the study patient. DM and Preexisting renal insufficiency were significantly higher in group I patients. HTN was (61.5% Vs 44.9%) higher in group I but not significantly. History of ACE inhibitor/ARB, NSAID intake and LVEF <40% were significantly higher in group I patients. The mean±SD volume of CM (Contrast Media) were 156.9±44.8 ml and 115.4±30.0 ml in group I and group II respectively, which was significant. The mean±SD of serum creatinine after 48-72 hours of CAG/PCI was 1.4±0.37 mg/dl and 1.1±0.2 mg/dl in group I and group II respectively. The serum creatinine level increased significantly (p<0.05) after 48-72 hours of CAG/PCI in group I. In group II, S. creatinine level increased but not significant (p>0.05). Impaired renal function was found 76.9% and 2.0% in group I and group II respectively. DM, HTN, preexisting renal insufficiency, ACE inhibitor/ARB, NSAIDs, contrast volume (>150 ml), eGFR (<60 ml/min/ 1.73m2) and LVEF (<40%) are significantly (p0.05) associated for CIN development.Conclusion: CIN is an iatrogenic but preventable disorder results from the administration of contract media. Although rare in the general population, CIN occurs frequently in patients with underlying renal dysfunction and diabetes. In patients with pre angiographic normal renal function, the prevalence is low but in pre-existing renal impairment it may pose a serious threat. Thus risk factors are synergistic in their ability to predispose to the development of CIN. A careful risk-benefit analysis must always be performed prior to the administration of contrast media to patients at risk for CIN. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/cardio.v5i1.12227 Cardiovasc. j. 2012; 5(1): 37-43


Perfusion ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 026765912095205
Author(s):  
Xue Zhang ◽  
Peng Zhang ◽  
Shicheng Yang ◽  
Wenyuan Li ◽  
Xiuzhen Men ◽  
...  

Background: The aim of this research was to use the Mehran risk score to classify elderly diabetics with coronary heart disease to assess the preventive effect of trimetazidine on contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in different risk population. Methods: An uncompromised of 760 elderly diabetics that went through PCI were included in this research. The patients were first divided into three groups in the light of MRS: low-risk, moderate-risk, and high-risk group, then randomized into trimetazidine group and the control group respectively. The first endpoint was the amount of CIN, which is described as a rise in serum creatinine levels by ⩾44.2 μmol/L or ⩾25% ratio within 48 or 72 hours after medication. Second endpoint included differences in creatinine clearance rate (CrCl), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine (Scr), cystatin-C (Cys-C), and the incidence of major adverse events after administration. Results: In the three groups, the incidence of CIN in trimetazidine and control group was 5.0% versus 4.9%(χ2 = 0.005, p > 0.05), 8.0% versus 18.0% (χ2 = 7.685, p < 0.05), 10.4% versus 27.1% (χ2 = 4.376, p < 0.05), respectively. The multivariable logistic regression result demonstrated that trimetazidine intervention was a profitable element of CIN in moderate and high-risk groups (OR = 0.294, 95% CI 0.094-0.920, p = 0.035). Conclusion: Our study confirmed that trimetazidine can be considered for preventive treatment of CIN occurrence in elderly diabetics with moderate and high-risk population, while there is no obvious advantage compared with hydration therapy in low-risk patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nakhshab Choudhry ◽  
Amna Ihsan ◽  
Sadia Mahmood ◽  
Fahim Ul Haq ◽  
Aamir Jamal Gondal

AbstractObjectives:This study was designed to find the reliability of serum NGAL as an early and better diagnostic biomarker than that of serum creatinine for acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary intervention in Pakistani population.Materials and methods:One hundred and fifty-one patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention were included and demographic data were recorded. Blood was drawn by venipuncture in clot activator vacutainers and serum was separated and stored at 4°C. Sample was drawn before the percutaneous procedure and subsequently sampling was done serially for 5 days.Results:The mean±SD serum NGAL pre-PCI (39.92± 10.35 μg/L) and 4 h post-PCI (100.42±26.07 μg/L) showed highly significant difference (p<0.001). The mean±SD serum creatinine pre-PCI (70.1±11.8 μmol/L) and post-PCI (71.2±11.6 μmol/L) showed significant difference (p=0.005) on day 2 onwards but mean microalbumin showed insignificant results (p=0.533). The serum NGAL predicted CI-AKI with sensitivity of 95.8% and specificity of 97.6% for a cut off value of 118 μg/L.Conclusion:Our results suggest that NGAL is an excellent early diagnostic biomarker for acute kidney injury in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. S399
Author(s):  
N. Paramita Ayu ◽  
G. Widiana Raka ◽  
W. Sudana ◽  
K. Suwitra ◽  
J. Loekman Sidharta ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 739-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johann Auer ◽  
Frederik H Verbrugge ◽  
Gudrun Lamm

Acute kidney injury (AKI), mostly defined as a rise in serum creatinine concentration of more than 0.5 mg/dl, is a common, serious, and potentially preventable complication of percutaneous coronary intervention and is associated with adverse outcomes including an increased risk of inhospital mortality. Recent data from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry/Cath-PCI registry including 985,737 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention suggest that approximately 7% experienced AKI with a reported incidence of 3–19%. In patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), AKI occurs more frequently with rates up to 20% depending on patient and procedural characteristics. However, varying definitions of AKI limit comparisons of AKI rates across different studies. Recently, most studies have adopted the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria for definition and classification of AKI. Beyond the AKIN criteria for AKI, other classifications such as the risk, injury, failure, loss and end-stage kidney disease (RIFLE) and kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) criteria are used to define AKI. Notably, even small increases in serum creatinine beyond AKI may be associated with adverse outcomes including increased hospital length of stay and excess. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a serious and potentially preventable complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Worsening renal function is associated with adverse outcomes including a higher rate of in-hospital mortality. In patients undergoing primary PCI for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), AKI occurs up to 20% of such individuals. Varying definitions of AKI limit comparisons of AKI rates across different studies. Additionally, even small increases in serum creatinine beyond lavels meeting AKI definitions may be associated with adverse outcomes including increased hospital length of stay.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document