scholarly journals COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY WITH DEFIBRILLATOR VERSUS DEFIBRILLATOR ALONE IN HEART FAILURE PATIENTS WITH MODERATE TO SEVERE CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE

2015 ◽  
Vol 65 (10) ◽  
pp. A452
Author(s):  
Daniel Friedman ◽  
Jagmeet Singh ◽  
Jeptha Curtis ◽  
Wai Hong Tang ◽  
Haikun Bao ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. P3170-P3170
Author(s):  
D. Zachariah ◽  
B. Olechowski ◽  
R. Sands ◽  
N. P. Andrews ◽  
R. Balasubramaniam ◽  
...  

ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 999-1002
Author(s):  
Petra Nijst ◽  
Wilfried Mullens

Heart failure and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are frequent co-morbid conditions, and represent two challenging and costly diseases for individuals and societies. CKD has a prevalence up to 55% in patients with heart failure, with a significantly higher risk for arrhythmias, sudden cardiac death, hospitalization, and mortality. Cardiac implantable devices such as implantable cardioverter defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy are treatments proven to have a significant benefit on clinical outcomes in selected patients with heart failure. However, due to the high risk of non-cardiac death and substantial other co-morbidities in patients with CKD, the benefit of cardiac implantable devices may be attenuated. Furthermore, device-related complications are far more frequent in patients with CKD and relate to the patient’s clinical status and co-morbidities. Renal dysfunction, particularly severe CKD (glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m2) and end-stage CKD (with the necessity of dialysis or kidney transplantation), is associated with major complications including bleeding, infection, device/lead dysfunction, and vascular complications. Specific data and guidelines in this population are lacking due to the fact that CKD is a frequent exclusion criterion in most randomized clinical trials. Decisions for implantation and follow-up should be performed on an individual basis, taking into account individual risk/benefit ratios and done by a multidisciplinary team including a nephrologist and cardiologist.


2017 ◽  
pp. 101-106
Author(s):  
Thi Thanh Hien Bui ◽  
Hieu Nhan Dinh ◽  
Anh Tien Hoang

Background: Despite of considerable advances in its diagnosis and management, heart failure remains an unsettled problem and life threatening. Heart failure with a growing prevalence represents a burden to healthcare system, responsible for deterioration of patient’s daily activities. Galectin-3 is a new cardiac biomarker in prognosis for heart failure. Serum galectin-3 has some relation to heart failure NYHA classification, acute coronary syndrome and clinical outcome. Level of serum galectin-3 give information for prognosis and help risk stratifications in patient with heart failure, so intensive therapeutics can be approached to patients with high risk. Objective: To examine plasma galectin-3 level in hospitalized heart failure patients, investigate the relationship between galectin-3 level with associated diseases, clinical conditions and disease progression in hospital. Methodology: Cross sectional study. Result: 20 patients with severe heart failure as NYHA classification were diagnosed by The ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure (2012) and performed blood test for serum galectin-3 level. Increasing of serum galectin-3 level have seen in all patients, mean value is 36.5 (13.7 – 74.0), especially high level in patient with acute coronary syndrome and patients with severe chronic kidney disease. There are five patients dead. Conclusion: Serum galectin-3 level increase in patients with heart failure and has some relation to NYHA classification, acute coronary syndrome. However, level of serum galectin-3 can be affected by severe chronic kidney disease, more research is needed on this aspect Key words: Serum galectin-3, heart failure, ESC Guidelines, NYHA


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Mishkina ◽  
K Zavadovsky ◽  
V Saushkin ◽  
D Lebedev ◽  
Y Lishmanov

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Russian Foundation for Basic Research Introduction Impaired cardiac sympathetic activity and contractility are associated with poor prognosis in patients with heart failure after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). There are few prognostic data of the cardiac sympathetic activity and dyssynchrony in patients with chronic heart failure of various etiologies. Purpose To examine the prognostic significance of scintigraphic cardiac sympathetic activity and contractility in predicting the response to CRT and to assess the differences between patients with ischemic (IHF) and non-ischemic (NIHF) heart failure. Methods This study included 38 heart failure patients (24 male; mean age of 56 ± 11 years; 16 patients with ischemic etiology), who were submitted to CRT. Before CRT all patients underwent 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (123I-MIBG) imaging for cardiac sympathetic activity evaluating: early and delay heart to mediastinum ratio (eH/M and dH/M), summed MIBG Score (eSMS and dSMS). Moreover all patients underwent gated SPECT with the assessments of left ventricle dyssynchrony indexes: standard deviation (SD) and histogram bandwidth (HBW). In addition, all patients underwent gated blood-pool SPECT (GBPS) to assessed ejection fraction (EF) and stroke volume (SV) of both ventricles. Results One year after CRT response defined as LV ESV decreased by≥15% and/or LV EF increase by≥5%. Baseline cardiac sympathetic activity parameters showed significant differences between responders and non-responders only in NIHF patients: eH/M: 2.27 (2.02–2.41) vs. 1.64 (1.32–2.16); dH/M: 2.18 (2.11–2.19) vs. 1.45 (1.23 – 1.61); eSMS: 7 (5-7) vs. 15.5 (10–28.5); dSMS: 10 (10–13) vs. 16.5 (15.5–29). Significant differences in baseline LV dyssynchrony indexes between responders and non-responders were in patients of both group: in NIHF patients - SD: 54.3 (43–58) degree vs. 65 (62–66) degree; HBW: 179.5 (140–198) degree vs. 211 (208-213) degree, p &lt; 0.054 in IHF patients - HBW: 162 (115.2–180) degree vs.  115.2 (79.2–136.8) degree. Contractility of RV was significantly differed between responders and non-responders in IHF patients: RV EF: 54.5 (41-56) % vs. 44.5 (37–49.5) %; RV SV: 80 (69-101) ml vs. 55.5 (50–72.5) ml. According to univariate logistic regression analyses in IHF patients LV dyssynchrony indexes – SD (OR = 1.55; 95% CI 1.09-2.2; p &lt; 0.5) and HBW (OR = 1.13; 95% CI 1.02-1.24; p &lt; 0.5), as well as RV indexes – RV EF (OR = 1.11; 95% CI 1.001-1.23; p &lt; 0.5), RV SV (OR = 1.07; 95% CI 1.003-1.138; p &lt; 0.5) were predictors of CRT response. In the group of NIHF patients, dH/M (OR = 1.47; 95% CI 1.08-2; p &lt; 0.5), SD (OR = 0.83; 95% CI 0.73-0.95; p &lt; 0.5), HBW (OR = 0.96; 95% CI 0.93-0.99; p &lt; 0.5) showed the predictive value in terms of CRT response. Conclusion  Scintigraphic methods can be used to select patients for CRT. Cardiac 123I-MIBG scintigraphy and gated SPECT may be used for predicting CRT response in NIHF patients. Whereas in IHF patients ECG-gated SPECT and GBPS may be valuable for predicting the response to CRT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document