SIMULTANEOUS MEASUREMENT OF PULMONARY ARTERY DIASTOLIC PRESSURE BY CARDIOMEMS DEVICE AND LEFT ATRIAL PRESSURE MEASUREMENT BY TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAM IN HEART FAILURE POPULATION

The diastolic pressure gradient (DPG) has been proposed as the metric of choice for the diagnosis of pulmonary vascular changes in left heart disease. We tested the hypothesis that this metric is less sensitive to changes in left atrial pressure and stroke volume (SV) than the transpulmonary gradient (TPG). We studied the effect of dynamic changes in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), SV, and pulmonary artery capacitance (PAC) on DPG and TPG in 242 patients with acute heart failure undergoing decongestive therapy with continuous hemodynamic monitoring. There was a close impact of PCWP reduction on TPG and DPG, with a 0.13 mmHg (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07–0.19, P < 0.0001) and 0.21 mmHg (95% CI 0.16–0.25, P < 0.0001) increase for every 1 mmHg decrease in PCWP, respectively. Changes in SV had a negligible effect on TPG and DPG (0.19 and 0.13 mmHg increase, respectively, for every 10-mL increase in SV). Heart rate was positively associated with DPG (0.41-mmHg increase per 10 BPM [95% CI 0.22–0.60, P < 0.0001]). The resistance-compliance product was positively associated with both TPG and DPG (2.65 mmHg [95% CI 2.47–2.83] and 1.94 mmHg [95% CI 1.80–2.08] for each 0.1-s increase, respectively). In conclusion, DPG is not less sensitive to changes in left atrial pressure and SV compared with TPG. Although DPG was not affected by changes in PAC, the concomitant increase in the resistance-compliance product increases DPG.

Download Full-text

Validating Left Ventricular Filling Pressure Measurements in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure: CardioMEMS™ Pulmonary Arterial Diastolic Pressure versus Left Atrial Pressure Measurement by Transthoracic Echocardiography

Cardiology Research and Practice ◽

10.1155/2018/8568356 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 2018 ◽

pp. 1-6 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Sunit Tolia ◽

Zubair Khan ◽

Gunjan Gholkar ◽

Marcel Zughaib

Keyword(s):

Heart Failure ◽

New York ◽

Left Atrial ◽

Diastolic Pressure ◽

Systolic Dysfunction ◽

Heart Association ◽

Left Ventricular ◽

Functional Class ◽

Atrial Pressure ◽

Left Atrial Pressure

Background. Routine ambulatory echocardiographic estimates of left ventricular (LV) filling pressures are not cost-effective and are occasionally fraught with anatomic, physiologic as well as logistical limitations. The use of implantable hemodynamic devices such as CardioMEMS Heart Failure (HF) System has been shown to reduce HF-related readmission rates by remote monitoring of LV filling pressures. Little is known about the correlation between CardioMEMS and echocardiography-derived estimates of central hemodynamics. Methods. We performed a prospective, single-center study enrolling seventeen participants with New York Heart Association functional class II-III HF and preimplanted CardioMEMS sensor. Simultaneous CardioMEMS readings and a limited echocardiogram were performed at individual clinic visits. Estimated left atrial pressure (LAP) by echocardiogram was calculated by the Nagueh formula. Linear regression was used as a measure of agreement. Variability between methods was evaluated by Bland–Altman analysis. Results. Mean age was 74 ± 9 years; 59% (10/17) were males. LV systolic dysfunction was present in 76% (13/17) of subjects. Mean PAdP was 18 ± 4 mmHg and 19 ± 5 mmHg for CardioMEMS and echocardiographic-derived estimates, respectively, with a significant correlation between both methods (r2=0.798, p≤0.001). Conclusions. Our study illustrates a direct linear correlation between PAdP measured by CardioMEMS and simultaneous measurement of LV filling pressures derived by echocardiography.

Download Full-text

Development of a circulatory mock loop for biventricular device testing with various heart conditions

The International Journal of Artificial Organs ◽

10.1177/0391398820903316 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 43 (9) ◽

pp. 600-605 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Yuichiro Kado ◽

Takuma Miyamoto ◽

David J Horvath ◽

Shengqiang Gao ◽

Kiyotaka Fukamachi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Heart Failure ◽

Pulmonary Artery ◽

Pulmonary Artery Pressure ◽

Left Atrial ◽

Aortic Pressure ◽

Atrial Pressure ◽

Left Atrial Pressure ◽

Right Atrial ◽

Right Atrial Pressure ◽

Artery Pressure

This study aimed to evaluate a newly designed circulatory mock loop intended to model cardiac and circulatory hemodynamics for mechanical circulatory support device testing. The mock loop was built with dedicated ports suitable for attaching assist devices in various configurations. This biventricular mock loop uses two pneumatic pumps (Abiomed AB5000™, Danvers, MA, USA) driven by a dual-output driver (Thoratec Model 2600, Pleasanton, CA, USA). The drive pressures can be individually modified to simulate a healthy heart and left and/or right heart failure conditions, and variable compliance and fluid volume allow for additional customization. The loop output for a healthy heart was tested at 4.2 L/min with left and right atrial pressures of 1 and 5 mm Hg, respectively; a mean aortic pressure of 93 mm Hg; and pulmonary artery pressure of 17 mm Hg. Under conditions of left heart failure, these values were reduced to 2.1 L/min output, left atrial pressure = 28 mm Hg, right atrial pressure = 3 mm Hg, aortic pressure = 58 mm Hg, and pulmonary artery pressure = 35 mm Hg. Right heart failure resulted in the reverse balance: left atrial pressure = 0 mm Hg, right atrial pressure = 30 mm Hg, aortic pressure = 100 mm Hg, and pulmonary artery pressure = 13 mm Hg with a flow of 3.9 L/min. For biventricular heart failure, flow was decreased to 1.6 L/min, left atrial pressure = 13 mm Hg, right atrial pressure = 13 mm Hg, aortic pressure = 52 mm Hg, and pulmonary artery pressure = 18 mm Hg. This mock loop could become a reliable bench tool to simulate a range of heart failure conditions.

Download Full-text