intrathoracic impedance
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

122
(FIVE YEARS 8)

H-INDEX

16
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Block ◽  
E Paratz ◽  
A La Gerche ◽  
D Stub ◽  
N Strathmore ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The diagnostic yield of post-mortem interrogation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) including pacemakers, defibrillators and implantable loop recorders has not been well described. Methods We reviewed all post-mortem CIED interrogations performed by our statewide Institute of Forensic Medicine between 2005–2020 for investigation of sudden or unexplained death. Results 260 patients (68.8% male, median age 72.8 years [IQR 62.7–82.2]) underwent post-mortem CIED interrogation (202 pacemakers, 56 defibrillators and 2 loop recorders). CIEDs were implanted for a median of 2.0 [IQR 0.75–5] years, with 19 devices requiring replacement (and 5 end of life). Post-mortem interrogation was successful in 256 (98.5%) cases. Potential CIED malfunction was identified in 21 (8.1%) cases: untreated ventricular arrhythmias (n=13), lead failures (n=3) and battery depletion (n=5). CIED interrogation directly informed cause of death in 130 (50.0%) cases, with fatal ventricular arrhythmias identified in 121 patients (46.5%). In retrospect, 72 (27.7%) patients had abnormalities recorded by their device in the 30 days preceding death: non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (n=26), rapid atrial fibrillation (n=17), longevity concerns (n=22), intrathoracic impedance alarms (n=3), lead issues (n=3) or therapy delivered (n=1). In 6 cases where the patient was found deceased after a prolonged time, CIED interrogation accurately determined time of death. In one case, CIED interrogation was the primary method of patient identification. Conclusion Post-mortem CIED interrogation frequently contributes important information regarding critical device malfunction, pre-mortem abnormalities, cause and time of death or patient identity. Device interrogation should be considered for select patients with CIEDs undergoing autopsy. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.


EP Europace ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Diemberger ◽  
F Guerra ◽  
L Calo" ◽  
A D"onofrio ◽  
M Manzo ◽  
...  

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Utilization of remote monitoring platforms was recommended amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. The HeartLogic algorithm combines data from multiple implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) sensors (first and third heart sounds, intrathoracic impedance, respirations, night heart rate, and patient activity) to provide integrated data that may allow for detection of early signs of worsening HF. Purpose We examined whether the HeartLogic platform may elucidate behavioral changes that impact HF decompensation, and the possible consequences of home confinement caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods The Italian lockdown was imposed from March 8th to May 18th. On March 8th 2020, the HeartLogic feature was active in 349 ICD and cardiac resynchronization therapy ICD patients at 20 Italian centers. The period from January 1st to July 19th was divided in 3 phases: Pre-Lockdown (weeks 1-11), Lockdown (weeks 12-20), Post-Lockdown (weeks 21-29). Results Immediately after the implementation of stay at home orders (week 12) we observed a significant drop in median activity level (65min [36-103] in week 12 vs. 101min [61-140] in Pre-Lockdown; p < 0.001), while there was no difference in the other contributing sensors. The median composite HeartLogic index increased at the end of Lockdown (4.7 [1.3-10.2] in week 20 vs. 2.5 [0.7-7.0] in Pre-Lockdown; p = 0.019). The weekly rate of HeartLogic alerts was significantly higher during Lockdown (1.56 alerts/week/100pts, 95%CI:1.15-2.06; IRR = 1.71, p = 0.014) and Post-Lockdown (1.37 alerts/week/100pts, 95%CI:0.99-1.84; IRR = 1.50, p = 0.072) than that reported in Pre-Lockdown (0.91 alerts/week/100pts, 95%CI:0.64-1.27). However, the median duration of alert state and the maximum index value did not change among phases, as well as the proportion of alerts followed by clinical actions at the centers (Pre-Lockdown: 31%, Lockdown: 22%, Post-Lockdown: 28%), and the proportion of alerts fully managed remotely (i.e. no in-clinic visits) (Pre-Lockdown: 89%, Lockdown: 90%, Post-Lockdown: 88%). Conclusions The system was sensitive to the behavioral changes occurred during the lockdown, i.e. decrease in activity. However, the home confinement had no impact on the other sensors. The higher rate of HeartLogic alerts during lockdown and the increase in the median index after 8 weeks of home confinement suggest the worsening of the HF status, possibly explained by the behavioral changes. Nonetheless, the management of the HF detected events (actions performed and management strategy) was not impacted by the restrictions.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasushi Wakabayashi ◽  
Masanori Kobayashi ◽  
Tomohide Ichikawa ◽  
Takashi Koyama ◽  
Hidetoshi Abe

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shantanu Sarkar ◽  
Jodi L Koehler ◽  
Eddy Warman

Introduction: Intrathoracic impedance (IMP), measured in ICD/CRTD implantable devices, is a measure of intravascular blood volume and have been shown to correlate with intracardiac pressures. We investigated the temporal characteristics of IMP before and after HF events (HFE) in a large real-world cohort of patients (pts) with ICD/CRTD devices. Methods: We linked Optum© deidentified EHR dataset during the period from 2007-2017 to the Medtronic CareLink data warehouse. Pts with ICD/CRTD implants with IMP measurements were included. HFE was defined as an inpatient, ED, or observation unit stay with primary diagnosis of HF and IV diuretics administration. Temporal average of IMP measurement across all pts in the 60 days pre and post HFE were compared for HFE with and without readmission for HF within 60 days and in pts with no HFE. Results: A total of 17,886 pts with 1.8±1.2 years of follow-up met inclusion criteria. The average age was 66.6 ±12.3 years, with 72% being males, and 51% with ICD devices. A total of 1174 pts had 1425 HFE with no readmission and 282 pts had 295 HFE which were followed by readmission. A total of 17,839 pts had no HFE over 86,858 follow-up months. The average IMP during HFE, with and without readmission, and in pts with no HFE are shown in Fig. IMP decreases over a period of time prior to HFE and recovers due to treatment during HFE. The average IMP across all patients was lower on all 60 days pre and post HFE with readmission compared to HFE with no readmission (p<0.001) and both were lower compared to follow-up period with no HFE (p<0.001). The IMP recovers less often after HF events which are followed by readmission within 60 days compared to HF events with no readmission. Conclusions: In a large real-world population of pts with ICD/CRTD devices, on an average IMP reduces prior to and recovers during HFE. IMP was lower before and after HFE with readmission compared to HFE with no readmission. Readmission is more likely in pts with smaller impedance recovery after HF events.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 3040-3048
Author(s):  
Michael R. Zile ◽  
Vinod Sharma ◽  
Catalin F. Baicu ◽  
Jodi Koehler ◽  
Anthony S. Tang

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Appignani ◽  
T Salvatore ◽  
E Di Girolamo

Abstract Background Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) is a strong recommendation in heart failure (HF) patients having sinus rhythm, left bundle branch block, QRS duration ≥ 120 ms and left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) ≤ 35%, despite optimized medication. Echocardiographic parameters still have a controversial role in the selection of patients ongoing CRT, and no single parameter is recommended to identify a positive CRT response. Even their role in the management after implantation remains still troubleshooting. Atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delay reprogramming could be a variable that may influence CRT outcome and, although a systematic AV and VV optimization is not required, it could be useful in selected patients. Remote monitoring networks allow HF patients having a CRT device to be constantly monitored, and notifications of some intrathoracic impedance indexes, may be helpful in the management of HF patients. Purpose To evaluate the usefulness of intrathoracic impedance notifications in the selection of HF patients to have echo-guided AV and/or VV delays optimization, the following study was undertaken. Methods 27 CRT patients having an intrathoracic impedance enabled remote monitoring, with at least one impedance notification during the first six months from implantation, were considered for study. The primary endpoint was a composite of improvement in NYHA functional class and EF, reduction of LV end-systolic volume and rehospitalization for decompensated HF. Secondary endpoint was the effectiveness of echo-guided dealys optimization based on intrathoracic impedance alerts. The AV delay optimization was mainly driven by mitral inflow pattern, whereas VV delay optimization was guided by the assessment of LV synchrony using color Tissue Doppler Imaging (TDI). Patients were weekle evaluated through remote monitoring network over a six-month follow-up. LVEF and LV end-systolic volume were determind at baseline and after six months. Results After the six-month follow-up, an improvement of at least 1 NYHA functional class was obtained in 23 patients (85%), while 2 patients (7.4%) experienced an improvement of two NYHA classes. In 21 Patients (77.7%) LVEF increased at least 5%. Optimization was associated with an average 11.9 ± 6.4% increas in EF, from a mean baseline of 28.2 ± 3.2% to 37.8 ±6.2%. End-systolic volume decreased from 161.56 ± 9.87 ml to 143.22 ± 15.83 ml. Among the 27 patients with impedance alerts at baseline, only 6 (22.2%) reported new notifications during follow-up, with a significant reduction (p &lt; 0.03) after optimization. Conclusions Intrathoracic impedance monitoring improved the selection of non responders feasible to have echo-guided AV and/or VV delays optimization. Functional status and LVEF increased. Although time-consuming, this multidisciplinary network may increase close cooperation between electrophysiologist and HF physicians to better manage HF patients having a CRT system implanted.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 105
Author(s):  
Min-Tsun Liao ◽  
Chun-Kai Chen ◽  
Ting-Tse Lin ◽  
Li-Ying Cheng ◽  
Hong-Wen Ting ◽  
...  

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure (HF). Modern pacemakers provide an index of intrathoracic fluid status (OptiVol fluid index—OVFI) by measuring daily intrathoracic impedance. This study aimed to determine whether OVFI is associated with increased atrial tachycardia/fibrillation (AT/AF) events in patients with a preserved ejection fraction (EF). We retrospectively reviewed data from patients with Medtronic Advisa pacemakers between 2012 and 2014 in our hospital. The association and temporal relationship between OVFI and AT/AF events were determined. A total of 150 patients with 211 follow-up visits (mean 1.4 visits per patient) were evaluated. The device-detected AT/AF prevalence was 47%. Device-measured OVFI ≥ 20 Ω-days was significantly associated with the onset of AT/AF ≥ 4 h. OVFI threshold crossing preceded AT/AF events in 55.1% of cases, followed by AT/AF events in only 18.7%. Fluid overload represented by OVFI may trigger AT/AF episodes in patients with a preserved EF more often than that previously reported in patients with a reduced EF. Our findings support the view that worsening pulmonary congestion is associated with increased AT/AF frequency and suggests that fluid overload could trigger and perpetuate AT/AF events in patients with a preserved EF.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1604.e13-1604.e16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher C. Cheung ◽  
Jacob M. Larsen ◽  
Jamil Bashir ◽  
Paul Dorian ◽  
Zachary W. Laksman

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (12) ◽  
pp. 1577-1582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Osman ◽  
Azza Ahmed ◽  
Hussam Alzubi ◽  
Babikir Kheiri ◽  
Khansa Osman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document