scholarly journals CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY RISK IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER TREATED WITH ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION THERAPY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (11) ◽  
pp. 248
Author(s):  
Neville Tan ◽  
Christopher Neil ◽  
Nicholas Cox ◽  
Mark Nolan
2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 155798832110248
Author(s):  
Yong Yuan ◽  
Qiang Zhang ◽  
Chaofan Xie ◽  
Tao Wu

Context: Several studies reported the application of androgen deprivation therapy and radiotherapy in patients with biochemical recurrence after prostate cancer operation. Objective: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating of endocrine therapy and radiotherapy in patients with biochemical recurrence after prostate cancer surgery. The primary end point was biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS). Secondary end point was overall survival (OS). Methods: A systematic review of PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify relevant studies published in English up to March 2020. Twelve studies were selected for inclusion. Results: There were 11 studies included in the present study. Including two randomized controlled trials and nine cohort studies. The meta-analysis shows a significant bPFS benefit from androgen deprivation therapy and radiotherapy in patients with biochemical recurrence after prostate cancer operation. (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.57; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.52–0.63; p < .001). For patients with GS < 7 and low-risk patients, combined treatment can have a benefit for BPFs (HR: 0.53; 95% CI, 0.37–0.76; HR: 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36–0.93). Androgen deprivation therapy and radiotherapy in patients with biochemical recurrence was associated with a slightly OS improvement (HR: 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57–0.93; p = 0.01). Conclusions: Compared with salvage radiotherapy alone, This meta-analysis shows a significant bPFS benefit from endocrine therapy combined with salvage radiotherapy in patients with biochemical recurrence after prostate cancer operation. And benefit more for high-risk groups. However, there was no significant benefit in group GS ≥ 8. It shows a slightly OS benefit from endocrine therapy combined with salvage radiotherapy in patients with biochemical recurrence.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e0157660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Engel Ayer Botrel ◽  
Otávio Clark ◽  
Antônio Carlos Lima Pompeo ◽  
Francisco Flávio Horta Bretas ◽  
Marcus Vinicius Sadi ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 1281-1289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arie Carneiro ◽  
Andre Deeke Sasse ◽  
Andrew Aurel Wagner ◽  
Guilherme Peixoto ◽  
André Kataguiri ◽  
...  

BMC Cancer ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fanzheng Meng ◽  
Shimiao Zhu ◽  
Jinsheng Zhao ◽  
Larissa Vados ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 40-40
Author(s):  
Arie Carneiro ◽  
Andre Deeke Sasse ◽  
Andrew Wagner ◽  
Bruno Toneto ◽  
Ary Serpa Neto ◽  
...  

40 Background: A recently published meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT) showed that androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) did not significantly increase cardiovascular mortality in prostate cancer patients. However, cardiovascular morbidity, which can impact quality of life, was not evaluated. Objectives: To evaluate the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with long-term ADT in patients with prostate cancer. Methods: We conducted a literaturesearch from 1960 and June 2012. We selected RCT and large cohort studies that evaluated first-line endocrine therapy, ADT greater than 6 months, and follow up greater than 1 year. Results: Thirteen studies (137,658 patients) were included. Of four cohort studies, 126,898 patients were included and 10,760 patients were part of nine RCTs. Analysis of the RCTs showed no differences in development of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (OR 1.23; 95% CI: 0.92 – 1.64; I2: 0%) or stroke (OR 1.02; 95% CI: 0.71 – 1.46; I2: 0%) among patients receiving ADT or not. The analysis of three randomized studies that reported other nonfatal cardiovascular events demonstrated a significant increase in such events in the group receiving ADT (OR 1.55; 95% CI: 1.09 – 2.20; I2: 0%). When large cohort studies were included in the analysis, an increased risk of AMI among men who had ADT was found ( OR 2.01, 95% CI:1.90 – 2.13; I2: 91.3%). Conclusions: ADT in prostate cancer patients for at least 6 months is not associated with cardiovascular mortality, acute myocardial infarct and stroke. However, patients receiving ADT had a significant increase in nonfatal cardiovascular events.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document