A one-year audit of topics and domains in the Journal of the American Medical Association and the New England Journal of Medicine

2000 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Woolf
Keyword(s):  
England Journal ◽  
American Medical Association ◽  
Medical Association ◽  
New England ◽  
American Medical ◽  
One Year

scholarly journals Year in Review: Synopsis of Selected Articles in Neuroanesthesia and Neurocritical Care from 2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (01) ◽  
pp. 03-10
Author(s):  
KokWeng Leong ◽  
Tara Dalby ◽  
Lashmi Venkatraghavan
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
England Journal ◽  
American Medical Association ◽  
Medical Association ◽  
New England ◽  
American Medical ◽  
Neurocritical Care ◽  
High Impact ◽  
Critical Care Medicine ◽  
Medical Journals

AbstractThis review is a synopsis of selected articles from neuroscience, neuroanesthesia, and neurocritical care from 2019 (January–November 2019). The journals reviewed included anesthesia journals, critical care medicine journals, neurosurgical journals, as well as high-impact medical journals such as the Lancet, Journal of American Medical Association, New England Journal of Medicine, and Stroke. This summary of important articles will serve to update the knowledge of anesthesiologists and other perioperative physicians who provide care to neurosurgical and neurocritical cases.

scholarly journals Year in Review: Synopsis of Selected Articles in Neuroanesthesia and Neurocritical Care from 2018

2019 ◽  
Vol 06 (01) ◽  
pp. 018-023
Author(s):  
Kyle J. Rogan ◽  
Tumul Chowdhury ◽  
Lakshmikumar Venkatraghavan
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
England Journal ◽  
American Medical Association ◽  
Medical Association ◽  
Impact Factor ◽  
New England ◽  
American Medical ◽  
Neurocritical Care ◽  
High Impact ◽  
High Impact Factor

AbstractThis review is a synopsis of selected articles from neuroscience, neuroanesthesia, and neurocritical care from the year 2018 (January–October 2018). The journals reviewed included anesthesia journals, critical care medicine journals, neurosurgical journals as well as high-impact factor medical journals such as Lancet, Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA), New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), and Stroke. This summary of important articles will serve to update the knowledge of anesthesiologists and other perioperative physicians who provide care to neurosurgical and neurocritical patients.

scholarly journals Journal Watch

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-52
Author(s):  
Joe Wileman ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Medicine ◽  
Medical Journal ◽  
England Journal ◽  
British Medical Journal ◽  
American Medical Association ◽  
Medical Association ◽  
New England ◽  
American Medical ◽  
Journal Watch

Journals were reviewed between August and December 2010. The journals reviewed include: The lancet, Lancet Neurology, New England Journal of Medicine, British Medical Journal, Heart, Gut, Thorax, Circulation, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), American Journal of Medicine, Archives of Internal Medicine, and Annals of Internal Medicine. The articles chosen are those which have particular relevance to Acute Physicians.

scholarly journals Journal Watch

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-98
Author(s):  
Phillip Cockrell ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Medicine ◽  
Medical Journal ◽  
England Journal ◽  
British Medical Journal ◽  
American Medical Association ◽  
Medical Association ◽  
New England ◽  
American Medical ◽  
Hospital Infection ◽  
Journal Watch

Journals were reviewed between January and April 2011. The journals reviewed include: American Journal of Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, Archives of Internal Medicine, British Medical Journal, Gut, Heart, Journal of Hospital Infection, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), The Lancet, Lancet Neurology, New England Journal of Medicine and Thorax. The articles chosen are those which were felt to have particular relevance to Acute Physicians.

scholarly journals Year in Review: Synopsis of Selected Articles in Neuroanesthesia and Neurocritical Care from 2020

2021 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
pp. 012-019
Author(s):  
Tariq Esmail ◽  
Sudhakar Subramaniam ◽  
Lashmi Venkatraghavan
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
England Journal ◽  
American Medical Association ◽  
Medical Association ◽  
New England ◽  
American Medical ◽  
Neurocritical Care ◽  
High Impact ◽  
Critical Care Medicine ◽  
Medical Journals

AbstractThis review is a synopsis of selected articles from neuroscience, neuroanesthesia, and neurocritical care from the year 2020 (January–December 2020). The journals reviewed include anesthesia journals, critical care medicine journals, neurology and neurosurgical journals, as well as high-impact medical journals such as the Lancet, Journal of American Medical Association, New England Journal of Medicine, and Stroke. This summary of important articles will serve to update the knowledge of anesthesiologists and other perioperative physicians who provide care to neurosurgical and neurocritical care patients. In addition, some of the important narrative reviews that are of interest to neuroanesthesiologists are also listed.

scholarly journals COVID-19 en Panamá y el Mundo: Una Revisión

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 37-60
Author(s):  
René de Jesús Rivera Gutiérrez ◽  
María Ramírez ◽  
Alicia Rodríguez ◽  
Jorge Hernández
Keyword(s):  
Medical Journal ◽  
England Journal ◽  
British Medical Journal ◽  
American Medical Association ◽  
Medical Association ◽  
New England ◽  
American Medical ◽  
Medicine Journal ◽  
Distribución Geográfica

Antecedentes: El virus SARS-CoV-2, causante de la Enfermedad por Coronavirus de 2019 (COVID-19) emergió en Wuhan, China, en diciembre de 2019, y tiene un alcance pandémico en la actualidad. Su fisiopatología, distribución geográfica y características clínicas son objetivo de estudio y análisis continuo, con resultados prometedores e influyentes, pero difíciles de reunir y sintetizar considerando las numerosas fuentes de información y el dinamismo de la curva epidemiológica de esta pandemia. Objetivo: Esta revisión tiene como objetivo sintetizar la literatura actual sobre la pandemia del COVID-19, con el propósito de establecer de forma transparente y concisa la información de origen nacional e internacional disponible, de manera que esta sirva como una fuente confiable de la evidencia publicada.  Diseño: Se utilizaron artículos científicos publicados entre diciembre de 2019 y marzo de 2020, que fueron seleccionados por su relevancia, validez y calidad de contenido, obtenidos a través de revistas científicas como New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association, The Lancet y el British Medical Journal, además de la información proporcionada por instituciones reconocidas a nivel mundial, como lo son la Organización Mundial de la Salud y  el Centro para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades. Conclusiones: La información actual sobre la pandemia del SARS-CoV-2 está renovándose continuamente y se espera que continúe haciéndolo por los próximos meses. Se torna complicado el mantenerse a la vanguardia, por lo cual confiamos en que esta revisión será útil para distintos estudiantes y profesionales de la salud.

scholarly journals Journal Watch January – May 2013

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-118
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Clayton ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Journal ◽  
England Journal ◽  
British Medical Journal ◽  
American Medical Association ◽  
Medical Association ◽  
New England ◽  
American Medical ◽  
Journal Watch

In this article I have reviewed 4 articles of interest to acute physicians from literature covering the period January to May 2013 in the New England Journal of Medicine, British Medical Journal, Journal of the American Medical Association and the Lancet.

COVID-19: INFORMAÇÕES SOBRE TRANSMISSIBILIDADE, SINTOMAS, POPULAÇÃO DE RISCO, FATORES DE PREVENÇÃO E INTERVENÇÕES TERAPÊUTICAS

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Diogo Martins Ribeiro
Keyword(s):  
England Journal ◽  
American Medical Association ◽  
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
Medical Association ◽  
New England ◽  
American Medical ◽  
Medical Virology ◽  
Medicine Journal

A transmissão do novo coronavírus Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2, causador da doença coronavírus 2019 ou COVID-19) de pessoa a pessoa, para diferentes países, áreas ou territórios, gera intensa preocupação entre pesquisadores e a população em geral. Até o dia 9 de maio já foram registrados quase 4 milhões de casos confirmados do COVID-19 em todo o mundo, com quase 270 mil mortes associadas (taxa de fatalidade próxima a 7%). Objetivando disponibilizar informações importantes sobre o novo coronavírus, para auxiliar a comunidade científica e orientar a população em geral, esta revisão de literatura foi elaborada a partir de informações coletadas na base de dados Pubmed, na plataforma ScienceDirect, e especificamente na revista científica Nature Research e nos jornais científicos The Lancet, The New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Medical Virology, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), bem como nos repositórios BioRxiv e MedRxiv e diferentes órgãos internacionais de saúde. Ainda são recentes os estudos referentes a intervenções terapêuticas a serem consideradas contra o SARS-CoV-2, bem como há a necessidade de maiores investigações quanto à patogenicidade e transmissibilidade desse vírus, e quanto aos seus efeitos em crianças, gestantes e animais.

The Opioid Epidemic and the Pursuit of Moral Medicine: A Computational-Rhetorical Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-30
Author(s):  
S. Scott Graham
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
England Journal ◽  
American Medical Association ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Medical Association ◽  
New England ◽  
American Medical ◽  
Opioid Dependence ◽  
Rhetorical Analysis ◽  
Opioid Epidemic

This article offers a longitudinal computational-rhetorical analysis of biomedical writing on opioids. Using a corpus of 1,467 articles and essays published in the New England Journal of Medicine and the Journal of the American Medical Association between 1959 and May 2019, this study evaluates diachronic shifts in (a) the framing of opioid pharmacology, (b) the relative attention paid to pain management versus opioid dependence risks, and (c) the distribution of statements related to physicians’ primary ethical obligations. The results of these analyses largely disconfirm different current accounts of shifting physician rhetoric around opioids and pain management leading up to the recognition opioid epidemic. Most notably, the results also suggest that biomedical debates surrounding opioids are serving as proxy arguments for shifting primary bioethical obligations from individual patients to public health.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document