Effectiveness of protein A for antibody immobilization for a fiber optic biosensor

1997 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 329-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
George P. Anderson ◽  
Meagan A. Jacoby ◽  
Frances S. Ligler ◽  
Keeley D. King
2011 ◽  
Vol 409 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangyu Shen ◽  
Chenbo Cai ◽  
Kun Wang ◽  
Jilin Lu

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Tsekenis ◽  
Marianneza Chatzipetrou ◽  
Maria Massaouti ◽  
Ioanna Zergioti

Immunosensor sensitivity and stability depend on a number of parameters such as the orientation, the surface density, and the antigen-binding efficiency of antibodies following their immobilization onto functionalized surfaces. A number of techniques have been developed to improve the performance of an immunosensor that targets one or both of the parameters mentioned above. Herein, two widely employed techniques are compared for the first time, which do not require any complex engineering of neither the antibodies nor the surfaces onto which the former get immobilized. To optimize the different surface functionalization protocols and compare their efficiency, a model antibody-antigen system was employed that resembles the complex matrices immunosensors are frequently faced with in real conditions. The obtained results reveal that protein A/G is much more efficient in increasing antibody loading onto the surfaces in comparison to boronate ester chemistry. Despite the fact, therefore, that both contribute towards the orientation-specific immobilization of antibodies and hence enhance their antigen-binding efficiency, it is the increased antibody surface density attained with the use of protein A/G that plays a critical role in achieving maximal antigen recognition.


Sensors ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. 808-822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viswaprakash Nanduri ◽  
Giyoung Kim ◽  
Mark Morgan ◽  
Daniel Ess ◽  
Byoung-Kwon Hahm ◽  
...  

1990 ◽  
Vol 229 ◽  
pp. 169-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Pierre Alarie ◽  
Michael J. Sepaniak ◽  
Tuan Vo-Dinh

2003 ◽  
Vol 2003 (5) ◽  
pp. 291-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Walid Qoronfleh ◽  
Ling Ren ◽  
Daryl Emery ◽  
Maria Perr ◽  
Barbara Kaboord

Immunoprecipitation (IP) and coimmunoprecipitation (co-IP) are key techniques for studying protein-protein interactions. These methods utilize immobilized protein A or protein G to isolate antibody-bound target antigens. The main disadvantage of traditional immunoprecipitation and coimmunoprecipitation is that the conditions used to elute the precipitated antigen also release the antibody, contaminating the antigen and destroying the antibody support. To overcome these problems, we describe two methods to generate a reusable antibody support by cross-linking the antibody to immobilized protein A or protein G, or by coupling it directly to the resin. Our studies have demonstrated that the immobilization efficiency for the antibody coupling method was similar for several species of antibody. Furthermore, we illustrate that using both methods of antibody immobilization yields IP and co-IP results similar to traditional protocols but eliminate the antibody heavy and light chains contamination.


The Analyst ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 138 (7) ◽  
pp. 2023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena de Juan-Franco ◽  
Antonio Caruz ◽  
J. R. Pedrajas ◽  
Laura M. Lechuga

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document