Abrasive Wear Behavior of High Chromium Cast Iron and Hadfield Steel—A Comparison

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 43-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehdi Mazar Atabaki ◽  
Sajjad Jafari ◽  
Hassan Abdollah-pour
2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Sun ◽  
Ren-bo Song ◽  
Xu Wang ◽  
Peng Deng ◽  
Chun-jing Wu

Wear ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 135 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tong Jian-Min ◽  
Zhou Yi-Zhong ◽  
Shen Tian-Yi ◽  
Deng Hai-Jin

2021 ◽  
Vol 406 ◽  
pp. 334-347
Author(s):  
Khedidja Bouhamla ◽  
Amel Gharbi ◽  
Oualid Ghelloudj ◽  
Ali Hadji ◽  
Maouche Hichem ◽  
...  

Various facilities are used in mineral processing to prepare raw material. Practically, two types of balls are used, cast balls and forged balls. They are respectively made from high chromium cast iron and forged steel and are supplied in different sizes and chemical compositions. The cast and forged balls have different microstructures and consequently display dissimilar wear behavior. The target aimed in this work is to achieve a comparative study taking into account the type of microstructure, mechanical properties, and wear behavior of these two kinds of materials. Specimens have undergone chemical, metallographic and XRD characterizations. Subsequently, these samples were subjected to hardness measurements, abrasion and friction tests in order to evaluate their wear behaviour. Tribological tests, under unlubricated environment, are carried out on both types of grinding balls in order to study the wear system. Corrosion tests are also performed on forged steel and high chromium cast iron ball samples. The obtained results reveal a large difference in terms of chemical composition and microstructural components. Chromium cast iron balls are more resistant to friction, whereas forged balls are more resistant to abrasion. Additionally, the corrosion tests reveal a narrow discrepancy in corrosion behaviour between the studied materials.


Metals ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mojin Zhou ◽  
Yudong Sui ◽  
Xiaoyu Chong ◽  
YeHua Jiang

The abrasive wear resistance of zirconia toughened alumina (ZTA) ceramic particle reinforced high chromium cast iron (HCCI) composites has been systematically investigated using a moving wedge type of apparatus. The results of three-body abrasive wear show that the wear resistance of the composites with honeycomb is three times higher than that of the high chromium cast iron. The wear resistance of the composites with a honeycomb structure is close to that of the layer structure and is higher than that of the HCCI because the honeycomb wall in the cell honeycomb structure is prominent and because the honeycomb core is depressed. The wear mechanisms of the composites are mainly microcutting and fatigue fractures. The honeycomb structure forms a “macrocosmic shadow protection effect” and a “microcosmic shadow protection effect” to protect each composite and to improve the wear resistance of the composites.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document