Selection of controls in injury case-control studies

2000 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 455 ◽  
Author(s):  
SW Marshall ◽  
AE Waller ◽  
DP Loomis ◽  
JA Langlois
Epidemiology ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. S153-S154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tony Fletcher ◽  
Giovanni Leonardi ◽  
Kvetoslava Koppova ◽  
Rupert Hough ◽  
Peter Rudnai ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 135 (9) ◽  
pp. 1042-1050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sholom Wacholder ◽  
Debra T. Silverman ◽  
Joseph K. McLaughlin ◽  
Jack S. Mandel

2007 ◽  
Vol 79 (9) ◽  
pp. 652-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marian K. Bakker ◽  
Hermien E.K. de Walle ◽  
Aileen Dequito ◽  
Paul B. van den Berg ◽  
Lolkje T.W. de Jong-van den Berg

Biostatistics ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 682-694 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Liu ◽  
W. Lu ◽  
V. Krogh ◽  
G. Hallmans ◽  
T. V. Clendenen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 566-568
Author(s):  
Vivian H Lyons ◽  
Ali Rowhani-Rahbar ◽  
Avanti Adhia ◽  
Noel S Weiss

Conducting case–control studies using the National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) has the potential to introduce selection bias and misclassification through control selection. Some studies that use NVDRS compare groups of individuals who died by one mechanism, intent or circumstance, to individuals who died by another mechanism, intent or circumstance. For aetiological studies within NVDRS, the use of controls who had a different type of violent death has the potential to introduce selection bias, while relying on narrative summaries for exposure measurement may result in misclassification. We discuss these two methodological issues, and identify an unusual circumstance in which selection of live controls within NVDRS can be employed.


Author(s):  
Alan J. Silman ◽  
Gary J. Macfarlane ◽  
Tatiana Macfarlane

The most important aspect that will influence the validity of any epidemiological study is the careful selection of the subjects for investigation. Separate issues relate to the sampling of subjects for disease status in case–control studies, and sampling by exposure status in cohort studies. In simplest terms, the issues are who should be the cases and, given that, who should be the controls. Thus, in each instance the needs are to identify the sampling frame and then what should be the process for selecting the specific sample or subsamples needed for study. In addition to consideration of who to study, other factors such as how to identify and verify plus the size of the planned study are all topics to be addressed.


1992 ◽  
Vol 135 (9) ◽  
pp. 1019-1028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sholom Wacholder ◽  
Joseph K. McLaughlin ◽  
Debra T. Silverman ◽  
Jack S. Mandel

2005 ◽  
Vol 93 (06) ◽  
pp. 1153-1160 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Gutiérrez ◽  
Juan de Dios Luna ◽  
José Linares ◽  
María del Rosario Montes ◽  
Emilia Quesada ◽  
...  

SummaryWe carried out a meta-analysis of observational case-control studies published before May 2004 to assess the degree of association between Chlamydophila pneumoniae (Cp) infection and PAOD. A search of the Medline database was performed using atherosclerosis and "Chlamyd* pneumoniae" as keywords. Strict criteria were applied for the selection of case studies, which had to be studies of Cp seroprevalence or of Cp detection in patients versus controls. Forty-three published studies that met these criteria were selected. An association between PAOD and Cp was revealed by immunohistochemical analysis (OR=15.4, 95%CI=5.0–46.9) and nested PCR studies of arterial biopsies (OR=4.3, 95%CI=1.8–10), by PCR study of non-arterial samples (OR=2.9, 95%CI=1.2–7.0), by other direct-detection tests (OR=16.7, 95%CI=7.0–39.8), and by ELISA and MIF tests to detect high IgG (OR=2, 95%CI=1.1–3.5 and OR=1.7, 95%CI=1.0–2.9, respectively) and IgA (OR=1.9, 95%CI=1.1–3.4 and OR=1.5, 95%CI=1.1–2.0, respectively) titers. No significant association was found in simple PCR studies of arterial biopsies, MIF tests to detect low IgG titers or IgM, or ELISA studies to detect IgM. According to this review, the association between Cp infection and PAOD depends on the analytical method adopted. Establishing a relationship between Cp and PAOD will require a case-control study with an adequate number of cases and samples that uses a combination of direct and indirect techniques to identify the presence of the bacterium in different types of sample from the same subjects, correlating the results with the activity of the disease.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document