Corneal crystals as a presenting sign for smoldering multiple myeloma: a new case and literature review of this rare association

2021 ◽  
Vol 132 ◽  
pp. S76
Author(s):  
Kelly Miller ◽  
Joseph Iuorno ◽  
Ann Jewell ◽  
Anna Harrison ◽  
Natario Couser
2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 249 ◽  
Author(s):  
So Young Park ◽  
Jae Min Kim ◽  
Hyun Joon Kang ◽  
Minje Kim ◽  
Jae Joon Han ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Brooke N Learned ◽  
Wazhma Nasiri-Ahad ◽  
James E Davis ◽  
Alpa G Desai ◽  
Alan Chang

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 421
Author(s):  
Niccolo’ Bolli ◽  
Nicola Sgherza ◽  
Paola Curci ◽  
Rita Rizzi ◽  
Vanda Strafella ◽  
...  

Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), an asymptomatic plasma cell neoplasm, is currently diagnosed according to the updated IMWG criteria, which reflect an intermediate tumor mass between monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and active MM. However, SMM is a heterogeneous entity and individual case may go from an “MGUS-like” behavior to “early MM” with rapid transformation into symptomatic disease. This wide range of clinical outcomes poses challenges for prognostication and management of individual patients. However, initial studies showed a benefit in terms of progression or even survival for early treatment of high-risk SMM patients. While outside of clinical trials the conventional approach to SMM generally remains that of close observation, these studies raised the question of whether early treatment should be offered in high-risk patients, prompting evaluation of several different therapeutic approaches with different goals. While delay of progression to MM with a non-toxic treatment is clearly achievable by early treatment, a convincing survival benefit still needs to be proven by independent studies. Furthermore, if SMM is to be considered less biologically complex than MM, early treatment may offer the chance of cure that is currently not within reach of any active MM treatment. In this paper, we present updated results of completed or ongoing clinical trials in SMM treatment, highlighting areas of uncertainty and critical issues that will need to be addressed in the near future before the “watch and wait” paradigm in SMM is abandoned in favor of early treatment.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1969
Author(s):  
Aline Rangel-Pozzo ◽  
Pak Yu ◽  
Sadhana LaL ◽  
Yasmin Asbaghi ◽  
Luiza Sisdelli ◽  
...  

The prognosis of multiple myeloma (MM), an incurable B-cell malignancy, has significantly improved through the introduction of novel therapeutic modalities. Myeloma prognosis is essentially determined by cytogenetics, both at diagnosis and at disease progression. However, for a large cohort of patients, cytogenetic analysis is not always available. In addition, myeloma patients with favorable cytogenetics can display an aggressive clinical course. Therefore, it is necessary to develop additional prognostic and predictive markers for this disease to allow for patient risk stratification and personalized clinical decision-making. Genomic instability is a prominent characteristic in MM, and we have previously shown that the three-dimensional (3D) nuclear organization of telomeres is a marker of both genomic instability and genetic heterogeneity in myeloma. In this study, we compared in a longitudinal prospective study blindly the 3D telomeric profiles from bone marrow samples of 214 initially treatment-naïve patients with either monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), or MM, with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Here, we report distinctive 3D telomeric profiles correlating with disease aggressiveness and patient response to treatment in MM patients, and also distinctive 3D telomeric profiles for disease progression in smoldering multiple myeloma patients. In particular, lower average intensity (telomere length, below 13,500 arbitrary units) and increased number of telomere aggregates are associated with shorter survival and could be used as a prognostic factor to identify high-risk SMM and MM patients.


2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 467-479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adolfo Correa ◽  
Leila Jackson ◽  
Aparna Mohan ◽  
Helen Perry ◽  
Kathy Helzlsouer

1980 ◽  
Vol 302 (24) ◽  
pp. 1347-1349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Kyle ◽  
Philip R. Greipp

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document