SouthSeq: genome sequencing as a frontline genetic test in the NICU

2021 ◽  
Vol 132 ◽  
pp. S116-S117
Author(s):  
Michelle Amaral ◽  
Michelle Thompson ◽  
Kevin Bowling ◽  
Candice Finnila ◽  
Susan M. Hiatt ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 435-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anath C Lionel ◽  
Gregory Costain ◽  
Nasim Monfared ◽  
Susan Walker ◽  
Miriam S Reuter ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 650-662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andre E. Minoche ◽  
Claire Horvat ◽  
Renee Johnson ◽  
Velimir Gayevskiy ◽  
Sarah U. Morton ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deanna G Brockman ◽  
Christina A Austin-Tse ◽  
Renée C Pelletier ◽  
Caroline Harley ◽  
Candace Patterson ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic yield and clinical utility of clinical genome sequencing (cWGS) as a first genetic test for patients with suspected monogenic disorders. Methods: We conducted a prospective randomized study with pediatric and adult patients recruited from genetics clinics at Massachusetts General Hospital who were undergoing planned genetic testing. Participants were randomized into two groups: standard-of-care genetic testing (SOC) only or SOC and cWGS. Results: 204 participants were enrolled and 99 received cWGS. cWGS returned 23 molecular diagnoses in 20 individuals: A diagnostic yield of 20% (20/99, 95%CI 12.3-28.1%)), which was not significantly different from SOC (17%, 95%CI 9.7%-24.6%, P=0.584). 19/23 cWGS diagnoses provided an explanation for clinical features or were considered worthy of additional workup by referring providers. While cWGS detected all variants reported by SOC, SOC failed to capture 9/23 cWGS diagnoses; primarily due to genes not included in SOC tests. Turnaround time was significantly shorter for SOC compared to cWGS (33.9 days vs 87.2 days, P<0.05). Conclusions: cWGS is technically suitable as a first genetic test and identified clinically relevant variants not captured by SOC. However, further studies addressing other variant types and implementation challenges are needed to support feasibility of its broad-scale adoption.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 504-514
Author(s):  
Zuhair N. Al-Hassnan ◽  
Abdulrahman Almesned ◽  
Sahar Tulbah ◽  
Ali Alakhfash ◽  
Faten Alhadeq ◽  
...  

Background: Childhood-onset cardiomyopathy is a heterogeneous group of conditions the cause of which is largely unknown. The influence of consanguinity on the genetics of cardiomyopathy has not been addressed at a large scale. Methods: To unravel the genetic cause of childhood-onset cardiomyopathy in a consanguineous population, a categorized approach was adopted. Cases with childhood-onset cardiomyopathy were consecutively recruited. Based on the likelihood of founder mutation and on the clinical diagnosis, genetic test was categorized to either (1) targeted genetic test with targeted mutation test, single-gene test, or multigene panel for Noonan syndrome, or (2) untargeted genetic test with whole-exome sequencing or whole-genome sequencing. Several bioinformatics tools were used to filter the variants. Results: Two-hundred five unrelated probands with various forms of cardiomyopathy were evaluated. The median age of presentation was 10 months. In 30.2% (n=62), targeted genetic test had a yield of 82.7% compared with 33.6% for whole-exome sequencing/whole-genome sequencing (n=143) giving an overall yield of 53.7%. Strikingly, 96.4% of the variants were homozygous, 9% of which were found in 4 dominant genes. Homozygous variants were also detected in 7 novel candidates ( ACACB, AASDH, CASZ1, FLII, RHBDF1, RPL3L, ULK1 ). Conclusions: Our work demonstrates the impact of consanguinity on the genetics of childhood-onset cardiomyopathy, the value of adopting a categorized population-sensitive genetic approach, and the opportunity of uncovering novel genes. Our data suggest that if a founder mutation is not suspected, adopting whole-exome sequencing/whole-genome sequencing as a first-line test should be considered.


2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 305-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Radoje Drmanac ◽  
Brock A Peters ◽  
George M Church ◽  
Clifford A Reid ◽  
Xun Xu

2020 ◽  
Vol 139 (4) ◽  
pp. 473-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huijun Wang ◽  
Yulan Lu ◽  
Xinran Dong ◽  
Guoping Lu ◽  
Guoqiang Cheng ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 45 (13) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
MICHELE G. SULLIVAN
Keyword(s):  

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. S. W. H. Hendriks ◽  
F. J. M. Grosfeld ◽  
A. A. M. Wilde ◽  
J. van den Bout ◽  
I. M. van Langen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document