An algorithm for detecting the onset of muscle contraction by EMG signal processing

1998 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 211-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvestro Micera ◽  
Angelo M. Sabatini ◽  
Paolo Dario
2015 ◽  
Vol 719-720 ◽  
pp. 969-972
Author(s):  
Teng Yu Zhang ◽  
Chun Jing Tao

In this paper, the surface electromyogram (EMG) signal of the hemiplegic patients and healthy people were collected when completing upper limb movements, then the general EMG characteristic rules of healthy people in common action were analyzed, and the EMG characteristics of hemiplegic patients in time and frequency domain were extracted. By comparing and analyzing the EMG characteristics between the hemiplegic patients and healthy people, the results showed that the order and magnitude of muscle contraction of hemiplegic patients were not comply with the general laws of healthy people, which resulted in disorganized movement.


2005 ◽  
pp. 153-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Fleischer ◽  
Konstantin Kondak ◽  
Christian Reinicke ◽  
Günter Hommel

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nahid Tahan ◽  
Amir Massoud Arab ◽  
Bita Vaseghi ◽  
Khosro Khademi

Context:Coactivation of abdominal and pelvic-floor muscles (PFM) is an issue considered by researchers recently. Electromyography (EMG) studies have shown that the abdominal-muscle activity is a normal response to PFM activity, and increase in EMG activity of the PFM concomitant with abdominal-muscle contraction was also reported.Objective:The purpose of this study was to compare the changes in EMG activity of the deep abdominal muscles during abdominal-muscle contraction (abdominal hollowing and bracing) with and without concomitant PFM contraction in healthy and low-back-pain (LBP) subjects.Design:A 2 × 2 repeated-measures design.Setting:Laboratory.Participants:30 subjects (15 with LBP, 15 without LBP).Main Outcome Measures:Peak rectified EMG of abdominal muscles.Results:No difference in EMG of abdominal muscles with and without concomitant PFM contraction in abdominal hollowing (P = .84) and abdominal bracing (P = .53). No difference in EMG signal of abdominal muscles with and without PFM contraction between LBP and healthy subjects in both abdominal hollowing (P = .88) and abdominal bracing (P = .98) maneuvers.Conclusion:Adding PFM contraction had no significant effect on abdominal-muscle contraction in subjects with and without LBP.


Author(s):  
Ali Salman ◽  
Javaid Iqbal ◽  
Umer Izhar ◽  
Umar Shahbaz Khan ◽  
Nasir Rashid
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document