The effect of body mass index (BMI) on disease-free and overall survival in node-positive breast cancer treated with docetaxel and doxorubicin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy: the experience of the BIG 02-98 trial

2008 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 58-59
Author(s):  
E. De Azambuja ◽  
W. McCaskill-Stevens ◽  
E. Quinaux ◽  
M. Buyse ◽  
J. Crown ◽  
...  
1989 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 1120-1128 ◽  
Author(s):  
A K Tandon ◽  
G M Clark ◽  
G C Chamness ◽  
A Ullrich ◽  
W L McGuire

Amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene was recently reported to predict poor clinical outcome in node-positive breast cancer patients. Since expression of the oncogene as its protein product might be even more closely related than gene amplification to disease progression, we have now examined levels of the HER-2/neu oncogene protein for its prognostic potential in both node-positive and node-negative breast cancer. Using Western blot analysis, levels of this protein were determined in 728 primary human breast tumor specimens. We examined relationships between this protein and other established markers of prognosis, as well as clinical outcome. In node-negative patients (n = 378), the HER-2/neu protein failed to predict disease outcome. However, in node-positive patients (n = 350), those patients with higher HER-2/neu protein had statistically shorter disease-free (P = .0014) and overall survival (P less than .0001) than patients with lower levels of the protein. Higher HER-2/neu protein was found in tumors without estrogen receptor (ER) (P = .02) or progesterone receptor (PgR) (P = .0003), and in patients with more than three positive lymph nodes (P = .04). A significant correlation between levels of the HER-2/neu gene protein and amplification of the gene itself was also found (n = 48, P less than .001). Multivariate analyses in these patients showed that the HER-2/neu protein is a significant independent predictor of both the disease-free and the overall survival in node-positive breast cancer, even when other prognostic factors are considered.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. e0170311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Il Yong Chung ◽  
Jong Won Lee ◽  
Ji Sung Lee ◽  
Yu Rang Park ◽  
Yul Ha Min ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 831-839 ◽  
Author(s):  
G T Budd ◽  
S Green ◽  
R M O'Bryan ◽  
S Martino ◽  
M D Abeloff ◽  
...  

PURPOSE To compare 1 year of therapy with continuous cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil (5-FU), vincristine, and prednisone (CMFVP) with a short course of treatment with a doxorubicin-based regimen in the postsurgical adjuvant treatment of patients with hormone receptor-negative, node-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Five-hundred thirty-one eligible women with hormone receptor-negative, node-positive breast cancer were randomized to receive either 1 year of therapy with CMFVP or 20 weeks of therapy with four 5-week courses of treatment with 5-FU, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and methotrexate (FAC-M). RESULTS At a median follow-up time of 4.9 years, the two treatment arms cannot be demonstrated to be different with respect to overall survival (stratified log-rank, P = .27). The 5-year survival rate is 64% on the CMFVP arm and 61% on the FAC-M arm. CMFVP produces marginally superior disease-free survival (P = .06). The estimated 5-year disease-free survival rate is 55% for patients treated with CMFVP as opposed to 50% for patients treated with FAC-M. CONCLUSION Neither regimen was shown to be superior in terms of overall survival. Because the disease-free survival produced by CMFVP is marginally superior to that produced by FAC-M, we do not recommend FAC-M for further investigation or for routine use. Possible implications of this study are discussed in the context of other adjuvant chemotherapy trials.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (36) ◽  
pp. 5664-5671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henri Roché ◽  
Pierre Fumoleau ◽  
Marc Spielmann ◽  
Jean-Luc Canon ◽  
Thierry Delozier ◽  
...  

Purpose The PACS 01 trial compared six cycles of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) with a sequential regimen of three cycles of FEC followed by three cycles of docetaxel (FEC-D) as adjuvant treatment for women with node-positive early breast cancer. Patients and Methods Between June 1997 and March 2000, 1,999 patients with operable node-positive breast cancer were randomly assigned to either FEC every 21 days for six cycles, or three cycles of FEC followed by three cycles of docetaxel, both given every 21 days. Hormone-receptor–positive patients received tamoxifen for 5 years after chemotherapy. The primary end point was 5-year disease-free survival (DFS). Results Median follow-up was 60 months. Five-year DFS rates were 73.2% with FEC and 78.4% with FEC-D (unadjusted P = .011; adjusted P = .012). Multivariate analysis adjusted for prognostic factors showed an 18% reduction in the relative risk of relapse with FEC-D. Five-year overall survival rates were 86.7% with FEC and 90.7% with FEC-D, demonstrating a 27% reduction in the relative risk of death (unadjusted P = .014; adjusted P = .017). The incidence of grade 3 to 4 neutropenia, the need for hematopoietic growth factor, and incidence of nausea/vomiting were higher with FEC. Docetaxel was associated with more febrile neutropenia in the fourth cycle, stomatitis, edema, and nail disorders. Though rare overall, there were fewer cardiac events after FEC-D (P = .03), attributable mainly to the lower anthracycline cumulative dose. Conclusion Sequential adjuvant chemotherapy with FEC followed by docetaxel significantly improves disease-free and overall survival in node-positive breast cancer patients and has a favorable safety profile.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document