233 Patient request for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy is due to a false perception of increased risk at time of intial diagnosis

1528 Background: Women with breast cancer have an increased risk of developing contralateral breast cancer in their lifetime. Thus increasing numbers of women have been electing to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) at the time of their initial breast cancer treatment. The objective of this study was to identify factors that determine the decision for CPM in patients at a major cancer center. Methods: 2,544 women with Stage 0-III unilateral primary breast cancer who underwent surgery to the breast at our institution from January 2000 to August 2006 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Patient and tumor characteristics were evaluated and comparisons were made between patients who did or did not undergo CPM using logistic regression. Results: Of the 2,544 patients, 1254 (49.3%) underwent total mastectomy for their known cancer; 282 (22.5%) of these patients underwent immediate or delayed CPM. Overall, 171 patients (6.7%) had genetic testing; and the use of testing increased in the latter years of the study (3.% in 2000–2002 vs. 8.2% in 2003–2006, p<.0001). 49 of 171 patients had genetic testing prior to surgery. 10 had a deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation, 9 of whom had a CPM (p=.002). 14 patients without a mutation also had a CPM. Multivariate analysis revealed factors associated with use of CPM were: age younger than 50, white race, family history of breast cancer, higher clinical tumor stage, invasive lobular histology, and use of reconstruction (Table). Conclusions: Both patient and tumor characteristics influence selection of CPM. Although the use of genetic testing is increasing, most women elect to undergo CPM without having genetic testing. Evidence-driven models are needed to better inform women of their absolute risk of contralateral breast cancer as well as competing risk from their primary breast cancer in order to empower them in their active-decision-making. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

Impact of bilateral mastectomy with or without immediate reconstruction on time to subsequent therapy in breast cancer in a community oncology clinic.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.e18154 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e18154-e18154

Author(s):

Rajshekhar Chakraborty ◽

Ronald Regal ◽

Brian Johnson ◽

Jennifer Benedict ◽

Bret Edward Buckley Friday

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Prophylactic Mastectomy ◽

Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy ◽

Bilateral Mastectomy ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Immediate Reconstruction ◽

Community Oncology ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Definitive Surgery

e18154 Background: Due to an increase in the elective decision to pursue contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM), the incidence of bilateral mastectomy (BM) with/without postmastectomy reconstruction (R) [BM+/-R] has increased in the last decade. While prior studies at academic centers have investigated concerns regarding its impact on subsequent cancer therapy, we hypothesized that BM+/-R is associated with a delay in initiation of adjuvant therapy (AT) in a community oncology clinic. Methods: This study involved chart review of all patients who underwent mastectomy as definitive surgery for stage I-III breast cancer between 2007 and 2012 and were subsequently followed at Essentia Health Cancer Center. The primary endpoint of the study was the proportion of patients receiving subsequent AT within 6 weeks of surgery (TST6) when compared between different surgical groups. Results: A total of 478 patients were included in the study, with a median age of 63 years. Patients were divided into 4 groups, BM-R (n = 133), BM+R (n = 73), unilateral mastectomy (UM) –R (n = 244) and UM+R (n = 28). Significant demographic differences were identified between the groups including age ( p< 0.001), medical comorbidities ( p< 0.001), and BMI ( p< 0.001). The incidence of any major post-operative complication (including flap/implant failure, infection and wound necrosis/dehiscence) or additional surgeries within 6 weeks of surgery was higher in patients undergoing reconstruction, [BM+R (19%) and UM+R (18%)] compared to those who did not [BM-R (6%) and UM-R (4%)] ( p< 0.001). Patients having major complications or needing additional surgeries within 6 weeks had a lower adjusted likelihood of achieving TST6 compared to those who did not (OR = 0.35; p= 0.009). However, there was no significant difference in TST6 between the surgical groups ( p= 0.31). Conclusions: Immediate post-mastectomy reconstruction is associated with a significantly increased risk of postoperative complications or need for additional surgeries within 6 weeks. In an appropriately selected patient population, CPM and reconstruction do not significantly delay subsequent AT in a community oncology clinic.

Download Full-text

Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy decision-making in the population-based iCanCare study of early-stage breast cancer patients.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2016.34.7_suppl.177 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 34 (7_suppl) ◽

pp. 177-177

Author(s):

Reshma Jagsi ◽

Sarah T. Hawley ◽

Kent A. Griffith ◽

Nancy K. Janz ◽

Allison W. Kurian ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Decision Making ◽

Family History ◽

Prophylactic Mastectomy ◽

Early Stage ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy ◽

Population Based ◽

Early Stage Breast Cancer ◽

Increased Risk

177 Background: Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) use is increasing in women who are not at increased risk of contralateral cancer development and will experience no survival benefit from the more morbid procedure. Little is known about treatment decision-making or provider interactions. Methods: We surveyed a weighted random sample of newly diagnosed patients with early-stage breast cancer who were treated in 2013-14, identified through the population-based SEER registries of Los Angeles and Georgia about 3 months after surgical treatment, and merged with SEER data (N=2632, RR=70%), to determine receipt of diagnostic tests and factors related to the decision about surgery (including knowledge and perceived physician recommendation). Results: Nearly half of 2,436 respondents with unilateral non-metastatic cancer considered CPM (25% strongly). Only 37% of those who considered CPM knew that it does not improve survival for all women with breast cancer (24% believed it does, 39% didn’t know). Among women receiving CPM, 37% believed it generally improves survival. Ultimately, 1,464 (60%) received BCS and 972 (40%) mastectomy (of whom 438, or 18% overall, received CPM). On multivariable analysis, pts who received CPM were younger, more likely to be white, and more likely to have a family history, private rather than Medicaid insurance, and received MRI. Even among pts without a deleterious genetic mutation or family history in multiple relatives (2,303), 400 (17%) received CPM. CPM was uncommon among pts who reported that their surgeons recommended against it (2.0% [17/832]) but much higher among those who reported no surgeon recommendation regarding CPM (21.3% [229/1,077]), and among those who perceived their surgeons to have recommended it (55.4% [147/265]). Conclusions: Many patients consider CPM, but knowledge is low. Use of CPM is substantial among patients without clinical indications but is low when patients report their surgeon recommended against it. In the context of shared decision-making, surgeon recommendations against CPM might help reduce potential overtreatment.

Download Full-text

Personalizing Decision-Making for Patients Choosing Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: A Utility Analysis of Genetic Factors and the Relative Risk of Breast Cancer

Plastic Surgery ◽

10.1177/2292550319880912 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 27 (4) ◽

pp. 319-324

Author(s):

Insiyah Campwala ◽

June Yoo ◽

Subhas Gupta

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Genetic Risk ◽

Prophylactic Mastectomy ◽

Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy ◽

Genetic Profile ◽

Utility Analysis ◽

Surgical Morbidity ◽

Term Survival ◽

Complication Risk ◽

Increased Risk

Introduction: There has been an increasing trend of patients with breast cancer electing to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM), despite the lack of evidence showing long-term survival benefit. We aim to quantify the tiered amount of genetic and surgical complication risk deemed necessary to justify CPM. Methods: A review of breast cancer–affiliated genetic mutations and morbidity rates of breast cancer surgery from a single institution was compiled. A survey using a utility analysis was created. Severity of breast cancer genetic risk and morbidity risk warranting CPM was quantified and evaluated. Results: A total of 143 surveys were submitted by women of the general population. Data analysis confirmed previous predictions that at a hypothetical increased risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC), about twice the proportion of women will elect CPM. With over 10 times the baseline risk and no surgical complications, 98.6% of women chose CPM. There was a decrease in affirmative responses with increasing morbidity. This decrease was least prominent at higher genetic risk, illustrating that when women are at a higher risk of CBC, the surgical morbidity rate has less of an impact on their decision for CPM. Conclusion: At increased risk of CBC, women are likely to elect for CPM. We anticipate that these findings will encourage the growing use of personalized medicine, with the potential to tailor breast cancer treatment plans for each patient’s personal genetic profile.

Download Full-text