Plastic strain and strain gradients at very small indentation depths

2001 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 1021-1034 ◽  
Author(s):  
N.I. Tymiak ◽  
D.E. Kramer ◽  
D.F. Bahr ◽  
T.J. Wyrobek ◽  
W.W. Gerberich
2019 ◽  
Vol 120 ◽  
pp. 283-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua D. Pribe ◽  
Thomas Siegmund ◽  
Vikas Tomar ◽  
Jamie J. Kruzic

2004 ◽  
Vol 365 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 186-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Aldazabal ◽  
J.Gil Sevillano

2001 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 558-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. C. C. Lam ◽  
A. C. M. Chong

Microscale sensing and actuating components are prevalent in microelectromechanical systems. Deformations of microscale components are dependent not only on the strains in the body, but also on the strain gradients. The contribution of strain gradients to plastic hardening is characterized by the specific strain gradient modulus of the material. The specific strain gradient modulus has been predicted to vary with the plastic strain. The moduli of plastically prestrained epoxy specimens were experimentally characterized in this investigation using nanoindentation. Prestraining induced softening and an energy model are developed to separate the effect of prestrain softening from the effect of strain gradient. The results indicated that the contribution of strain gradient to hardening was initially large but diminished with increased plastic deformation. A model was developed for power law material and was shown to compare well with the experimental results.


2019 ◽  
Vol 126 ◽  
pp. 136-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilio Martínez-Pañeda ◽  
Vikram S. Deshpande ◽  
Christian F. Niordson ◽  
Norman A. Fleck

Author(s):  
J. Temple Black

The output of the ultramicrotomy process with its high strain levels is dependent upon the input, ie., the nature of the material being machined. Apart from the geometrical constraints offered by the rake and clearance faces of the tool, each material is free to deform in whatever manner necessary to satisfy its material structure and interatomic constraints. Noncrystalline materials appear to survive the process undamaged when observed in the TEM. As has been demonstrated however microtomed plastics do in fact suffer damage to the top and bottom surfaces of the section regardless of the sharpness of the cutting edge or the tool material. The energy required to seperate the section from the block is not easily propogated through the section because the material is amorphous in nature and has no preferred crystalline planes upon which defects can move large distances to relieve the applied stress. Thus, the cutting stresses are supported elastically in the internal or bulk and plastically in the surfaces. The elastic strain can be recovered while the plastic strain is not reversible and will remain in the section after cutting is complete.


Author(s):  
D. L. Rohr ◽  
S. S. Hecker

As part of a comprehensive study of microstructural and mechanical response of metals to uniaxial and biaxial deformations, the development of substructure in 1100 A1 has been studied over a range of plastic strain for two stress states.Specimens of 1100 aluminum annealed at 350 C were tested in uniaxial (UT) and balanced biaxial tension (BBT) at room temperature to different strain levels. The biaxial specimens were produced by the in-plane punch stretching technique. Areas of known strain levels were prepared for TEM by lapping followed by jet electropolishing. All specimens were examined in a JEOL 200B run at 150 and 200 kV within 24 to 36 hours after testing.The development of the substructure with deformation is shown in Fig. 1 for both stress states. Initial deformation produces dislocation tangles, which form cell walls by 10% uniaxial deformation, and start to recover to form subgrains by 25%. The results of several hundred measurements of cell/subgrain sizes by a linear intercept technique are presented in Table I.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document