scholarly journals The roles of yield strength mismatch, interface strength, and plastic strain gradients in fatigue crack growth across interfaces

2020 ◽  
Vol 235 ◽  
pp. 107072
Author(s):  
Joshua D. Pribe ◽  
Thomas Siegmund ◽  
Jamie J. Kruzic
2019 ◽  
Vol 120 ◽  
pp. 283-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua D. Pribe ◽  
Thomas Siegmund ◽  
Vikas Tomar ◽  
Jamie J. Kruzic

Metals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1183
Author(s):  
Edmundo R. Sérgio ◽  
Fernando V. Antunes ◽  
Diogo M. Neto ◽  
Micael F. Borges

The fatigue crack growth (FCG) process is usually accessed through the stress intensity factor range, ΔK, which has some limitations. The cumulative plastic strain at the crack tip has provided results in good agreement with the experimental observations. Also, it allows understanding the crack tip phenomena leading to FCG. Plastic deformation inevitably leads to micro-porosity occurrence and damage accumulation, which can be evaluated with a damage model, such as Gurson–Tvergaard–Needleman (GTN). This study aims to access the influence of the GTN parameters, related to growth and nucleation of micro-voids, on the predicted crack growth rate. The results show the connection between the porosity values and the crack closure level. Although the effect of the porosity on the plastic strain, the predicted effect of the initial porosity on the predicted crack growth rate is small. The sensitivity analysis identified the nucleation amplitude and Tvergaard’s loss of strength parameter as the main factors, whose variation leads to larger changes in the crack growth rate.


Author(s):  
Andrew J. Slifka ◽  
Elizabeth S. Drexler ◽  
Robert L. Amaro ◽  
Damian S. Lauria ◽  
Louis E. Hayden ◽  
...  

The National Institute of Standards and Technology has been testing pipeline steels for about 3 years to determine the fatigue crack growth rate in pressurized hydrogen gas; the project was sponsored by the Department of Transportation, and was conducted in close collaboration with ASME B31.12 Committee on Hydrogen Piping and Pipelines. Four steels were selected, two X52 and two X70 alloys. Other variables included hydrogen gas pressures of 5.5 MPa and 34 MPa, a load ratio, R, of 0.5, and cyclic loading frequencies of 1 Hz, 0.1 Hz, and a few tests at 0.01 Hz. Of particular interest to ASME and DOT was whether the X70 materials would exhibit higher fatigue crack growth rates than the X52 materials. API steels are designated based on yield strength and monotonic tensile tests have historically shown that loss of ductility correlates with increase in yield strength. The X70 materials performed on par with the X52 materials in fatigue. The test matrix, the overall set of data, implications for the future, and lessons learned during the 3-year extensive test program will be discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document