Non-invasive intramyocellular lipid determination by 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS)

2002 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 25
Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 3406
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Bumes ◽  
Fro-Philip Wirtz ◽  
Claudia Fellner ◽  
Jirka Grosse ◽  
Dirk Hellwig ◽  
...  

Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-1 mutation is an important prognostic factor and a potential therapeutic target in glioma. Immunohistological and molecular diagnosis of IDH mutation status is invasive. To avoid tumor biopsy, dedicated spectroscopic techniques have been proposed to detect D-2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), the main metabolite of IDH, directly in vivo. However, these methods are technically challenging and not broadly available. Therefore, we explored the use of machine learning for the non-invasive, inexpensive and fast diagnosis of IDH status in standard 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS). To this end, 30 of 34 consecutive patients with known or suspected glioma WHO grade II-IV were subjected to metabolic positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (18F-FET) for optimized voxel placement in 1H-MRS. Routine 1H-magnetic resonance (1H-MR) spectra of tumor and contralateral healthy brain regions were acquired on a 3 Tesla magnetic resonance (3T-MR) scanner, prior to surgical tumor resection and molecular analysis of IDH status. Since 2-HG spectral signals were too overlapped for reliable discrimination of IDH mutated (IDHmut) and IDH wild-type (IDHwt) glioma, we used a nested cross-validation approach, whereby we trained a linear support vector machine (SVM) on the complete spectral information of the 1H-MRS data to predict IDH status. Using this approach, we predicted IDH status with an accuracy of 88.2%, a sensitivity of 95.5% (95% CI, 77.2–99.9%) and a specificity of 75.0% (95% CI, 42.9–94.5%), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) amounted to 0.83. Subsequent ex vivo 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) measurements performed on metabolite extracts of resected tumor material (eight specimens) revealed myo-inositol (M-ins) and glycine (Gly) to be the major discriminators of IDH status. We conclude that our approach allows a reliable, non-invasive, fast and cost-effective prediction of IDH status in a standard clinical setting.


2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (9) ◽  
pp. 544-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulio Gambarota ◽  
Chiara Perazzolo ◽  
Antoine Leimgruber ◽  
Reto Meuli ◽  
Patrice Mangin ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinicius da Eira Silva ◽  
Vitor de Salles Painelli ◽  
Samuel Katsuyuki Shinjo ◽  
Wagner Ribeiro Pereira ◽  
Eduardo Maffud Cilli ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTCarnosine is a dipeptide abundantly found in human skeletal muscle, cardiac muscle and neuronal cells having numerous properties that confers performance enhancing effects, as well as a wide-range of potential therapeutic applications. A reliable and valid method for tissue carnosine quantification is crucial for advancing the knowledge on biological processes involved with carnosine metabolism. In this regard, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) has been used as a non-invasive alternative to quantify carnosine in human skeletal muscle. However, carnosine quantification by 1H-MRS has some potential limitations that warrant a thorough experimental examination of its validity. The present investigation examined the reliability, accuracy and sensitivity for the determination of muscle carnosine in humans using in vitro and in vivo experiments and comparing it to reference method for carnosine quantification (high-performance liquid chromatography – HPLC). We used in vitro 1H-MRS to verify signal linearity and possible noise sources. Carnosine was determined in the m. gastrocnemius by 1H-MRS and HPLC to compare signal quality and convergent validity. 1H-MRS showed adequate discriminant validity, but limited reliability and poor agreement with a reference method. Low signal amplitude, low signal-to-noise ratio, and voxel repositioning are major sources of error.


2014 ◽  
Vol 153 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 122-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fleur M. Howells ◽  
Anne Uhlmann ◽  
Henk Temmingh ◽  
Heidi Sinclair ◽  
Ernesta Meintjes ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document