P105 Incidence of acute-phase reactions following treatment with denosumab or zoledronic acid: results from a randomized, controlled phase 3 study in patients with advanced cancer or multiple myeloma

2010 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. S56-S57
Author(s):  
H. Polderdijk ◽  
C. Kofler ◽  
J. Wang ◽  
M. Sarkeshik ◽  
H. Yeh
2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 405-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara Crotti ◽  
Nelson B. Watts ◽  
Maria De Santis ◽  
Angela Ceribelli ◽  
Gianluigi Fabbriciani ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19503-e19503
Author(s):  
Rajshekhar Chakraborty ◽  
Irbaz Bin Riaz ◽  
Saad Malik ◽  
Naimisha Marneni ◽  
Alex Mejia Garcia ◽  
...  

e19503 Background: The risk of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) despite mandatory thromboprophylaxis (TPx) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) receiving contemporary lenalidomide (Len)-based regimens is not well-defined. Methods: Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were queried to identify phase 1-3 clinical trials of Len-based regimens with mandatory TPx published until April 2018. Random effects meta-analysis was performed using CMAv3 software to obtain crude, and per 100 patient-cycle incidence rate (IR). Prespecified subgroup analyses were performed to obtain IR for VTE by (1) line of treatment (newly diagnosed [ND], relapsed/refractory [RR] and maintenance [Mx] phase) and (2) different Len-based regimens. Results: We screened 1069 citations and analyzed data from 43 trials with 8696 patients, including 17 in ND, 23 in RR and 3 in Mx phase. 12 out of 43 were Phase 3 randomized controlled trials. The overall incidence of VTE in 8696 patients was 4.6% (95% CI, 3.7-5.8%), with 1.0 event (95% CI, 0.7-1.4%) per 100 patient cycles. In patients with NDMM (n = 3295), 193 (5.9%) experienced VTE with a pooled IR of 0.9 (95% CI, 0.3-2.3) per 100 patient-cycle. Among RRMM patients (n = 3981), 251 (6.3%) experienced VTE with a pooled IR of 1.0 (95% CI, 0.4-2.3) per 100 patient-cycle. The incidence of VTE was highest with the following triplet regimens: Rd + Proteasome inhibitor (PIs) and Rd + Anthracycline (Ac) [+/- Vincristine], with the latter having a high risk of VTE regardless of the treatment phase (table). With Len Mx (n = 1420), 38 (2.7%) patients had VTE, with a pooled IR of 0.2 (95% CI, 0-2.1) per 100 patient-cycle. Conclusions: Patients with MM undergoing treatment with Len-based regimens remain at risk of VTE despite current TPx strategies. The estimates of VTE IR provided by this analysis can guide clinicians in assessing treatment-related risk of VTE in this setting. [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunli Yang ◽  
Chunxi Fu ◽  
Huawei Weng ◽  
Liqun Zou

Abstract Background Glucocorticoids-containing regimens are the standard first line treatment for most lymphoma patients, however, as the improvement of overall survival in these cases, glucocorticoids related osteopenia or osteoporosis attracted attention in clinical administration. We aim to investigate the efficacy of bisphosphonates in prevention bone mineral loss in glucocorticoids-treated lymphoma patients. Methods This is a prospective, randomized controlled phase 3 trial. Eligible lymphoma adults from China with first line glucocorticoids involved treatment, were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either Zoledronic acid (ZA) for twice infusion or not. All patients received daily oral calcium and vitamin D3 for one year. The primary endpoint, alternations of bone mineral loss from enrollment to the twelfth month at the lumbar spine (L1-L4), left hip and left femoral neck, measured by the dual-energy, x-ray absorptiometry scanners, recorded as T score; and new bone fractures during the first year, were analyzed by intent-to-treat. This trial was registered with www.Chictr.org, number ChiCTR-INR-17010771. Results Between May, 2016 to July, 2019, 84 patients were randomly assigned to both Zoledronic acid and control groups, 29 patients completed the study and were on follow-up. We found a marked improvement of T score in ZA group compared with the control in a year at lumbar spine, T score changes of L1-4 in ZA group and control group were as following: L1, 0.14±0.61 vs. -0.33±0.40, p=0.009; L2, 0.28±0.41 vs. -0.35±0.54, p=0.003; L3, 0.23±0.42 vs. -0.23±0.66, p=0.020; L4, 0.28±0.44 vs. -0.35±0.54, p=0.020. Meanwhile, no severe adverse event was observed on both groups. Conclusions Glucocorticoids-treatment lymphoma patients that prophylactic ZA infusion could relieve BMD loss to prevent osteoporosis without increasing severe adverse effects in Chinese population, providing reference for clinicians to consider ZA application in this situation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document