Pazopanib plus weekly paclitaxel versus weekly paclitaxel alone for platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory advanced ovarian cancer (MITO 11): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 561-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandro Pignata ◽  
Domenica Lorusso ◽  
Giovanni Scambia ◽  
Daniela Sambataro ◽  
Stefano Tamberi ◽  
...  
The Lancet ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 397 (10271) ◽  
pp. 281-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Lheureux ◽  
Mihaela C Cristea ◽  
Jeffrey P Bruce ◽  
Swati Garg ◽  
Michael Cabanero ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5532-5532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda R. Duska ◽  
Jubilee Brown ◽  
Danijela Jelovac ◽  
Kathleen N. Moore ◽  
William P. McGuire ◽  
...  

5532 Background: Inhibition of angiogenesis is a valuable treatment strategy for ovarian cancer. Pazopanib (paz) is a potent angiogenic small molecular inhibitor of the tyrosine kinases VEGRF-1, -2, -3, PDGFR, c-kit and has shown activity as a single agent in ovarian cancer. We designed a trial to assess the benefit of adding paz to gemcitabine (gem) in patients with recurrent, advanced ovarian cancer. Methods: An open-label, randomized, multi-site, phase 2 trial was conducted (NCT01610206) including patients with platinum resistant or sensitive ovarian cancer with up to 3 prior lines of chemotherapy, and measurable or evaluable disease. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive weekly gem 1000 mg/m2 with or without paz 800 mg QD and stratified according to platinum sensitivity and number of prior lines (1 vs 2 or 3). The primary endpoint was PFS. Intent-to-treat was defined as all eligible patients who receive any protocol treatment with analysis based on randomized arm. Results: As of 3/2017, we randomized 148 and treated 146 patients (target sample size 148 eligible patients who receive any protocol treatment). 75 (46 platinum resistant, 61%) were randomly assigned to receive gem/paz and 71 (41 platinum resistant, 58%) to receive gem only. 110 patients (75%) had received 2 or 3 prior lines. There were no unexpected toxicities or deaths. Adverse events were more common in the gem/paz group. The most common grade 3–4 AEs (gem/paz vs gem) were: neutropenia (25 [33%] vs 15 [21%]), fatigue (7 [10%] vs 1 [2%]), hypertension (11 [15%] vs 1 [1%]), elevated alanine aminotransferase (8 [11%] vs 0), thrombocytopenia (9 [12%] vs 12[3%]) and anemia (7 [9%] vs 2 [3%]). There were 2 GI perforations in the paz arm. Median time on therapy was 12 weeks (range 1-55 weeks). Of the 138 patients off study to date, 30 (22%) were for AE’s (23 on gem/paz arm). Conclusions: The gem/paz combination is tolerable in this population, with patients tolerating multiple cycles with manageable toxicity. Median follow-up and PFS data will be presented after 122 events (progression or death) have occurred per protocol (currently 117 events). Clinical trial information: NCT01610206.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 957-968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos ◽  
Su-Chun Cheng ◽  
Andrea E Wahner Hendrickson ◽  
Richard T Penson ◽  
Susan T Schumer ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5542-5542
Author(s):  
Yael Chava Cohen ◽  
Suzanne T. Berlin ◽  
Michael J. Birrer ◽  
Susana M. Campos ◽  
Tamar Rachmilewitz Minei ◽  
...  

5542 Background: VB-111 is a targeted anti-cancer gene therapy with a dual mechanism: anti angiogenic/vascular disruption and induction of an anti-tumor directed immune response. We report final results of a phase I/II study of VB-111 in combination with paclitaxel in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Methods: Study NCT01711970 was a prospective, open label, dose escalating study assessing combination treatment of VB-111 Q8W and weekly Paclitaxel. In the phase I part of the study patients were treated with escalating doses of intravenous VB-111 and Paclitaxel. In phase 2 patients were treated with therapeutic doses of VB-111 1x1013 Viral Particles and paclitaxel 80mg/m2. Assessments included safety, overall survival (OS), PFS, tumor response (CA-125 and RECIST) and histopathology. Results: 21 patients with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer were enrolled and treated in 2 US sites. Patients received a mean of 2.3 ±1.8 repeat doses of VB-111. 17/21 received the therapeutic dose. Median age was 65 (41-79) with a median of 3 (1-4) prior lines of therapy. Half of the subjects were Platinum refractory, and half were previously treated with antiangiogenics. No DLTs were observed. VB-111 was well tolerated and was associated with generally mild flu-like symptoms. In the therapeutic dose cohort, a 58% CA-125 GCIG response rate was seen in evaluable patients including durable responses, and responses in patients with platinum refractory disease and post anti-angiogenic failure . The median OS was 498 days in patients treated with Therapeutic Dose compared to 173 days in Sub-therapueutic dose (p = 0.028). Tumor Specimens taken after treatment demonstrated tumor infiltrated with cytotoxic CD8 T-cells and regions of apoptotic cancer cells. Conclusions: Treatment with VB-111 in combination with weekly Paclitaxel was safe and well tolerated. Favorable tumor responses and overall survival outcomes were associated with induction of an immunotherapeutic effect manifested as tumor infiltration with CD-8 T cells. Encouraging results are the basis for further exploration in the ongoing, placebo controlled, pivotal OVAL study. Clinical trial information: NCT01711970.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document