Radiographic progression-free survival in the ACIS trial for prostate cancer

2022 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. e4
Author(s):  
Ian F Tannock ◽  
Christopher M Booth ◽  
Bishal Gyawali ◽  
Anthony M Joshua
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

Radiographic progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint of overall survival in men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5057-5057
Author(s):  
Susan Halabi ◽  
Akash Roy ◽  
Qian Yang ◽  
Wanling Xie ◽  
William Kevin Kelly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Surrogate Endpoint ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Random Assignment ◽  
Moderate Correlation ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castrate Resistant

5057 Background: Radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) is commonly used as a co-primary endpoint in randomized clinical trials in men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, rPFS has not been established as a valid surrogate endpoint of overall survival (OS) in men with mCRPC. Here, we hypothesized that rPFS is a reliable surrogate for OS in mCRPC. We also explored whether PFS is a valid surrogate endpoint of OS at the aggregate trial level. Methods: We performed a systematic search of the literature encompassing the period January 2004-December 2020 using PubMed and clinical trials.gov to identify completed phase III trials in mCRPC post-docetaxel. Eligible trials had to be randomized phase III therapeutic trials that reported OS, PFS or rPFS. OS was measured from the date of random assignment to date of death from any cause or date of last follow-up. rPFS was defined as the time from random assignment to date of disease progression on CT and/or Tc bone scan per trial definition or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS included PSA progression as a component of the composite endpoint. Trial level surrogacy was evaluated by fitting linear regression on the treatment effect of rPFS (or PFS) and OS (in other words, the weighted linear regression of the log(hazard ratio) of OS on the log(hazard ratio) of rPFS). It was pre-specified that rPFS would be considered a valid surrogate for OS if R² was 0·7 or higher. Results: We identified 33 in men with mCRPC post docetaxel approval. We assessed the association between PFS and OS in 29,456 patients from 30 trials. Overall, a moderate correlation was observed at the trial level between OS and PFS ( R2 = 0.46, 95 %CI = 0.20-0.68) in these trials. In 18 trials with 16,818 mCRPC patients where rPFS was considered as a key endpoint, a moderate correlation between the treatment effects on rPFS and OS was observed at the trial level ( R2= 0.65, 95% CI = 0.23-0.87). Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates moderate correlation between treatment effects of rPFS and OS in patients with mCRPC. However, rPFS did not meet the pre-specified surrogacy threshold of 0.7. Clinical trial information: several.

Meaningful survival after cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): The Spanish experience.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 235-235
Author(s):  
Iria Gonzalez Maeso ◽  
Daniel E. Castellano ◽  
Begona Campos Balea ◽  
Emilio Esteban ◽  
Quionia Pérez Arnillas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Specific Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Adequate Treatment ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant

235 Background: New emerging therapies for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), such as cabazitaxel (CBZ), have prompted the need to identify appropriate patients (pts) for each specific treatment. We describe preliminary data on the experience with CBZ in patients (pts) with mCRPC in Spain. Methods: Medical records from docetaxel-resistant mCRPC pts receiving CBZ at 15 centers in Spain were reviewed retrospectively. Baseline characteristics, PSA response, overall survival (OS), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), and toxicity were collected. Results: Data from 79 consecutive pts (median age 70) were reviewed: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) zero to one (87.3%), Gleason score of 7 to 10 (87.1%), visceral involvement (24.1%), pain (74.7%), and radiological progression (68.4%) at CBZ initiation. Median duration of response to first-line androgen deprivation therapy was 20.8 months (mo). Most pts received less than or equal to two hormonal lines (72.2%) and only one docetaxel line (74.7%) before CBZ. Thirty-five (44.3%) pts had progressed on docetaxel. Progression less than six mo or greater than six mo after last docetaxel treatment was observed in 23 (29.1%) and 21 (26.6%) pts, respectively. New hormonal agents (abiraterone or enzalutamide) were given before CBZ in 2.5% of pts and after CBZ in 17.7%. Pts received a median of seven cycles (range 2 to 22) of CBZ. CBZ dose-reductions or -delays for any cause occurred in eight (10.1%) and 20 (25.3%) pts, respectively. Prophylactic G-CSF was given in 32 (40.5%) pts. A PSA decrease of greater than or equal to 50% and greater than or equal to 30% was reached in 41.2% and 48.6% of pts treated with CBZ. Median OS from first CBZ cycle was 16.2 [CI: 10.4;-] mo and median clinical and/or radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) was 9.9 mo [CI: 7.4; 13.1]. Fourteen (17.7%) pts experienced at least one grade greater than or equal to 3 treatment-related AE, the most common being neutropenia (n=4), febrile neutropenia (n=2), asthenia (n=4), and diarrhoea (n=2). No grade greater than or equal to 3 peripheral neuropathy was reported. An analysis of factors predicting outcome will be presented. Conclusions: CBZ administered in real-life practice and in the adequate treatment setting in Spain is associated with meaningful PFS and OS and an acceptable safety profile. Dose delays and reductions were low. Prophylactic G-CSF use in 4 out of 10 pts may have contributed to these good results.

Radiographic progression-free survival in the ACIS trial for prostate cancer – Authors' reply

2022 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. e5-e6
Author(s):  
Fred Saad ◽  
Peter De Porre ◽  
Sabine Brookman-May ◽  
Jinhui Li ◽  
Sharon A McCarthy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

Radiographic progression-free survival in the ACIS trial for prostate cancer

2022 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. e3
Author(s):  
Shai Gilboa ◽  
David Bomze ◽  
Gal Markel ◽  
Tomer Meirson
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone/prednisolone compared with enzalutamide in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer before or after chemotherapy: A retrospective study of real-world data (ACES).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 303-303
Author(s):  
Prantik Das ◽  
James Price ◽  
Michael Jones ◽  
Cristina Martin-Fernandez ◽  
Akram Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Biochemical Progression

303 Background: Abiraterone acetate (a prodrug of abiraterone, which is a selective inhibitor of androgen biosynthesis) combined with prednisone/prednisolone (AA+P) and enzalutamide (ENZ) (an androgen-receptor–signalling inhibitor) have proven survival benefit in men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in chemo naïve and prior chemo patients. There have been no studies directly comparing the effectiveness of ENZ to AA+P in mCRPC patients. Methods: A retrospective, survival analysis study of 143 real world mCRPC patients (90 in AA+P and 53 in ENZ group) was conducted. Patients who started their treatment between 1st February 2012 and 31st May 2016 were included. The primary endpoint was biochemical progression free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were radiographic progression free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS). Data was analysed using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for covariates: prior radical or palliative treatment; Gleason score; baseline PSA; age; and chemo naïve or not. Results: After median follow up of 15 months (IQR 7 to 23) 112 events of biochemical progression were observed (71 in AA+P and 41 in ENZ). 41%in AA+P group and 30% patients in ENZ group received prior chemo. The chance of biochemical progression was significantly lower among ENZ patients than AA+P patients, when adjusting for all covariates in the Cox PH model (Hazard Ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.82, p=0.004. There was a trend implying the chance of rPFS could be higher among ENZ patients than AA+P patients (HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.76 to 2.02, p=0.4). OS is lower among ENZ patients than AA+P patients, when adjusting for all covariates in the Cox PH model (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.41, p=0.7). 38% of ENZ patients reported fatigue compared to 16% of AA+P patients while hypertension was reported slightly more in AA+P patients than in ENZ patients. Conclusions: This study showed a statistically significant difference in biochemical progression-free survival, favouring ENZ, but no significant difference in radiographic progression-free survival or overall survival.

scholarly journals Radiographic Progression-Free Survival as a Clinically Meaningful End Point in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

JAMA Oncology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana E. Rathkopf ◽  
Tomasz M. Beer ◽  
Yohann Loriot ◽  
Celestia S. Higano ◽  
Andrew J. Armstrong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
End Point ◽  
Castration Resistant

scholarly journals Comparison of Radiographic Progression-Free Survival and PSA Response on Sequential Treatment Using Abiraterone and Enzalutamide for Newly Diagnosed Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis from Multicenter Cohort

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 1251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazumasa Komura ◽  
Yuya Fujiwara ◽  
Taizo Uchimoto ◽  
Kenkichi Saito ◽  
Naoki Tanda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Psa Response

Background: There is emerging evidence that radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) is highly correlated with overall survival (OS), potentially serving as an indicator of treatment outcome for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The objective of this study is to assess rPFS and prostate specific antigen (PSA) response in sequential treatment using androgen signaling inhibitors (ASIs) including abiraterone and enzalutamide in newly diagnosed CRPC. Methods: Propensity score matching was performed to reduce bias by confounding factors between first-line ASIs. The primary endpoints of the study included rPFS, time to PSA progression (TTPP), and PSA response. Results: A paired-matched group of 184 patients were identified. From the initiation of first-line ASIs, there was no significant difference in rPFS, TTPP, and PSA response between treatment arms. From the initiation of second-line ASIs, enzalutamide following abiraterone consistently exhibited longer rPFS (median: 7 and 15 months, p = 0.04), TTPP, and better PSA response compared to the reverse, whereas OS did not reach significance (median: 14 and 23 months, p = 0.35). Conclusion: Although the effect of ASIs as the first line was similar, the extent of cross-resistance might differ towards less resistance in enzalutamide following abiraterone than the reverse.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document