Abstract #212: Effect of Outpatient Diabetes Education on Clinical Outcomes

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 28
Author(s):  
Tanya Blaty ◽  
Steven Ranzoni ◽  
Theresa Anderson ◽  
Cathy Beyea ◽  
Debbie Pauls ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Olayinka O. Shiyanbola ◽  
Becky Randall ◽  
Cristina Lammers ◽  
Karly A. Hegge ◽  
Michelle Anderson

Background: Patient education programs encouraging diabetes self-management can improve clinical outcomes and lessen diabetes complications. This study implemented an innovative interprofessional student-led diabetes self-management and health promotion program for an underserved population and demonstrated an improvement in participant clinical outcomes and students’ understanding of interprofessional aspects of diabetes care.Methods and Findings: This community-based program was implemented at two sites that serve medically underserved individuals. Students from five health career professions led educational sessions designed to demonstrate critical components of diabetes self-management. The six-month longitudinal program covered topics within the Alphabet Strategy, including Advice, Blood pressure, Cholesterol, Diabetes control, Dental care, Diet, Eye care, Foot care, and Guardian drugs. Participants completed surveys evaluating diabetes knowledge, understanding of diabetes care, and health behaviours. Clinical values were collected before and after the program. Student surveys assessed their understanding of diabetes self-management. Upon completion of the program, all assessments were repeated to determine if there were improvements in outcomes. Thirty-eight participants and thirty students completed the study. There were significant improvements in participants’ diabetes knowledge, understanding of diabetes management, and clinical outcomes. There were significant improvements in the students’ ability to educate patients about foot care, eye care, and guardian drugs, as well as increased awareness of the role of each health profession in diabetes care.Conclusions: This interprofessional health promotion model showed significant improvements in patient and student outcomes. This innovative student-led program could be implemented in other settings and for the management of other chronic diseases.


2008 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 698-706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiva Metghalchi ◽  
Maribet Rivera ◽  
Larry Beeson ◽  
Anthony Firek ◽  
Marino De Leon ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Enza Gucciardi ◽  
Changchang Xu ◽  
Michele Vitale ◽  
Wendy Lou ◽  
Stacey Horodezny ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. e000111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura N McEwen ◽  
Mahmoud Ibrahim ◽  
Nahed M Ali ◽  
Samir H Assaad-Khalil ◽  
Hyam Refaat Tantawi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-103
Author(s):  
Zeeshan Hussain ◽  
Mohammed Alkharaiji ◽  
Iskandar Idris

Background: Hospitalised patients with diabetes experience a longer duration of inpatient stay, increased readmission rates and excess mortality compared with patients without diabetes.Objectives: To determine whether inpatient diabetes education (IDE), provided to hospitalised patients with diabetes, is an effective intervention in improving one or all of the following clinical outcomes: length of stay (LOS), readmission rate and mortality rate.Methods: A free-text search on MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, BNI and EMBASE was conducted on literature published from the date of each databases’ inception to March 2019. In addition, grey literature was used to support the search with the following key terms: ‘IDE’, ‘LOS’, ‘readmission’ and ‘mortality’, along with their possible substitutes and alternatives combined.Results: In total, eight studies met the inclusion criteria with a total number of 3,828 participants. Seven studies investigated LOS outcome for which accumulated mean LOS and median LOS were both lower (16.5% and 26.67%, respectively) in the IDE group compared with the non-IDE group. Six studies investigated readmittance rates, for which accumulated readmission rate (up to 12 months) was 15.9% lower in the IDE group than in the non-IDE group. Finally, the mortality rate was 36.6% lower in the IDE group compared with the non-IDE group, but this was non-significant and only one study reported this outcome.Conclusion: The findings of this review support the efficacy of an IDE programme in a hospital setting by reducing LOS and readmission rates in patients with diabetes. In addition, a possible trend towards a decreased mortality rate was observed. IDE is therefore recommended to improve clinical outcomes of hospitalised patients with diabetes.


2009 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 882-889 ◽  
Author(s):  
William R Doucette ◽  
Matthew J Witry ◽  
Karen B Farris ◽  
Randal P Mcdonough

Background Pharmacists in various settings have been effective in initiating diabetes treatment. Patients with diabetes require ongoing disease management, and community pharmacists are in a strategic position to provide such extended care. Little is known, however, about the effects of community pharmacist–provided interventions beyond the initial treatment period. Objective To evaluate the effect of community pharmacist–provided extended diabetes care service on primary clinical outcomes, including hemoglobin A1c (A1C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and blood pressure, and on patients' reported self-care activities. Methods A randomized controlled trial was conducted in patients with diabetes. Participants had already completed at least 2 diabetes education sessions at a local diabetes education center. Nine specially trained pharmacists administered interventions during up to 4 quarterly visits per patient. Interventions included discussing medications, clinical goals, and self-care activities with patients and recommending medication changes to physicians when appropriate. The main outcome measures were 12-month changes in A1C, LDL-C, blood pressure, and self-report of self-care activities. Results Seventy-eight patients participated in the study (36 intervention, 42 control); 66 were included in the final analysis (31 intervention, 35 control). Compared with changes in the control group, patients who received interventions significantly increased the number of days per week that they engaged in a set of diet and diabetes self-care activities (1.25 and 0.73 more days/wk, respectively). The mean 12-month changes for A1C, LDL-C, and blood pressure were not significantly different between the 2 study groups. Conclusions Although pharmacist-provided interventions did not demonstrate statistically significant improvements in clinical outcomes over the study period, study results did show that pharmacists were effective at increasing the number of days that patients spent engaging in healthy diet and diabetes self-care activities. Addressing lifestyle and self-care behaviors can be a beneficial component of a pharmacist-provided extended diabetes care service.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document