Cabazitaxel and prednisone as second-line therapy of metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 540-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jame Abraham
2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph A. von Klot ◽  
Markus A. Kuczyk ◽  
Alena Boeker ◽  
Christoph Reuter ◽  
Florian Imkamp ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 695-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Per Kongsted ◽  
Inge M. Svane ◽  
Henriette Lindberg ◽  
Rasmus Bisbjerg ◽  
Gedske Daugaard ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 120-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. S. Markova ◽  
V. B. Matveev ◽  
B. M. Nazranov

Currently, doctors have at their disposal a number of drugs prolonging life of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The majority is approved for use as the 1st line therapy and, in absence of direct comparison, is considered potentially equally effective. Patients with CRPC need continuous treatment for suppression of disease progression resulting in sequential use of therapeutic agents. Modern standards and recommendations do not provide a clear algorithm for prescription, therefore an individual approach is necessary taking in account various factors of a particular case ranging from previous therapies to patients’ preferences. This article considers the most significant factors affecting CRPC therapy selection and ways of therapy optimization in compliance with the established treatment standards and taking into account the list of drugs approved for use in Russia.


Author(s):  
Mikifumi Koura ◽  
Masaki Shiota ◽  
Shohei Ueda ◽  
Takashi Matsumoto ◽  
Satoshi Kobayashi ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective This study aimed to reveal the prognostic values of prior local therapy in first-line therapy using androgen receptor-axis targeting agents (abiraterone or enzalutamide) or docetaxel for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Methods The study included 303 patients treated with first-line therapy for non-metastatic and metastatic CRPC. The association between prior local therapy and therapeutic outcome including progression-free survival and overall survival was investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses as well as propensity score-matched analysis. Results In univariate analysis, local prior therapy was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.56, 95% confidence interval, 0.40–0.79; P = 0.0009). Overall survival, but not progression-free survival, was better among patients with prior local therapy compared with patients without prior local therapy even after multivariate analysis and propensity score-matched analysis. Conclusions This study robustly indicated that prior local treatment was prognostic for overall survival among patients with CRPC. This finding is useful to predict patient prognosis in CRPC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document