scholarly journals P138 Severe disease activity and cytomegalovirus colitis are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. S119-S120
Author(s):  
K.-J. Kim ◽  
H.-S. Lee ◽  
S.H. Park ◽  
B.D. Ye ◽  
D.-H. Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Cytomegalovirus Colitis ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

730 INCREASED RISK OF VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM IN PAEDIATRIC-ONSET INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE - A STUDY OF THE INTERNATIONAL PROSPECTIVE SAFETY REGISTRY

2021 ◽  
Vol 160 (6) ◽  
pp. S-146
Author(s):  
Renz Klomberg ◽  
Martine Aardoom ◽  
Polychronis Kemos ◽  
Frank Ruemmele ◽  
C.H. (Heleen) Van Ommen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

scholarly journals Impact of medical therapies for inflammatory bowel disease on the severity of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000774
Author(s):  
Fatema Alrashed ◽  
Robert Battat ◽  
Israa Abdullah ◽  
Aline Charabaty ◽  
Mohammad Shehab
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Aminosalicylic Acid ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Medical Therapies

BackgroundDuring COVID-19 pandemic, the safety of medical therapies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in relation to COVID-19 has emerged as an area of concern. This study aimed to evaluate the association between IBD therapies and severe COVID-19 outcomes.MethodWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all published studies from December 2019 to August 2021 to identify studies that reported severe COVID-19 outcomes in patients on current IBD therapies including 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), immunomodulators, corticosteroids, biologics, combination therapy, or tofacitinib.ResultsTwenty-two studies were identified. Corticosteroids (risk ratio (RR) 1.91 (95% CI 1.25 to 2.91, p=0.003)) and 5-ASA (RR 1.50 (95% CI 1.17 to 1.93, p=0.001)) were associated with increased risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes in patients with IBD patients. However, possible confounders for 5-ASA use were not controlled for. Sub-analysis showed that corticosteroids increased the risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admission but not mortality. Immunomodulators alone (RR 1.18 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.59, p=0.28)) or in combination with anti-TNFs ((RR 0.96 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.15, p=0.63)), tofacitinib (RR 0.81 (95% CI 0.49 to 1.33, p=0.40)) and vedolizumab ((RR 1.02 (95% CI 0.79 to 1.31, p=0.89)) were not associated with severe disease. Anti-TNFs (RR 0.47 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.54, p<0.00001)) and ustekinumab (RR 0.55 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.72, p<0.00001)) were associated with decreased risk of severe COVID-19.ConclusionIn patients with IBD, the risk of severe COVID-19 is higher among patients receiving corticosteroids. Corticosteroid use was associated with ICU admission but not mortality. The risk is also higher among patients receiving 5-ASAs. However, patient-level data were lacking and insufficient data existed for meta-regression analyses to adjust for confounding. Vedolizumab, tofacitinib, and immunomodulators alone or in combination with anti-TNF were not associated with severe disease. Anti-TNFs, and ustekinumab were associated with favourable outcomes.

scholarly journals Colorectal Cancer in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (05) ◽  
pp. 305-317
Author(s):  
Martina Nebbia ◽  
Nuha A. Yassin ◽  
Antonino Spinelli
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Mucosal Inflammation ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

AbstractPatients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at an increased risk for developing colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the incidence has declined over the past 30 years, which is probably attributed to raise awareness, successful CRC surveillance programs and improved control of mucosal inflammation through chemoprevention. The risk factors for IBD-related CRC include more severe disease (as reflected by the extent of disease and the duration of poorly controlled disease), family history of CRC, pseudo polyps, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and male sex. The molecular pathogenesis of inflammatory epithelium might play a critical role in the development of CRC. IBD-related CRC is characterized by fewer rectal tumors, more synchronous and poorly differentiated tumors compared with sporadic cancers. There is no significant difference in sex distribution, stage at presentation, or survival. Surveillance is vital for the detection and subsequently management of dysplasia. Most guidelines recommend initiation of surveillance colonoscopy at 8 to 10 years after IBD diagnosis, followed by subsequent surveillance of 1 to 2 yearly intervals. Traditionally, surveillance colonoscopies with random colonic biopsies were used. However, recent data suggest that high definition and chromoendoscopy are better methods of surveillance by improving sensitivity to previously “invisible” flat dysplastic lesions. Management of dysplasia, timing of surveillance, chemoprevention, and the surgical approaches are all areas that stimulate various discussions. The aim of this review is to provide an up-to-date focus on CRC in IBD, from laboratory to bedside.

scholarly journals Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients’ Perspectives during COVID-19 Pandemic: Results from a Portuguese Survey

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Joana Branco Revés ◽  
Catarina Frias-Gomes ◽  
Bárbara Morão ◽  
Catarina Nascimento ◽  
Carolina Palmela ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Immunosuppressive Therapy ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Professional Life ◽  
Professional Activity ◽  
Biologic Treatment ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
The Impact

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) do not seem to be at increased risk of infection by SARS-CoV-2, but there is a concern whether immunosuppressive therapy may be associated with more severe disease. Several clinical practice recommendations have been published to help guide IBD care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nonetheless, few studies have addressed patients’ perspectives and fears. We aimed to evaluate Portuguese IBD patients’ perspectives on the clinical management of their disease during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic as well as the impact on their professional life. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> An anonymous electronic survey was created using REDCap and was distributed by the Portuguese Association of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (APDI) between May and August 2020. Patients’ perspectives on immunosuppressive therapy, disease management, interaction with gastroenterology departments, and the impact of the pandemic in their professional life were assessed. Patients’ proposals to improve medical care were also evaluated. Descriptive analysis and logistic regression were performed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 137 participants answered the survey (79.6% females, mean age 41.7 ± 12.1 years). Although having IBD and receiving treatment with immunosuppressors (thiopurines, steroids, or biologics) were considered promotors of anxiety, most patients (85.4%) agreed that disease remission was a priority and only a minority of patients interrupted their treatment during the pandemic. In multivariate analysis, active disease, biologic treatment, and use of corticosteroids in the last 3 months were perceived by the patients as high-risk features for increased risk of SARS-Cov-2 infection and more severe disease. Fifty-nine patients (44%) believed that their follow-up was influenced by the pandemic and only 58.8% felt that they had the opportunity to discuss their therapeutic options with their doctor. Sixty-three patients (46.0%) were working from home during the pandemic, although this decision was related to IBD and immunosuppressive therapy in only 36.5 and 39.7% of the cases, respectively. Areas where care could have been improved during the pandemic were identified by patients, namely enhancement of the communication with IBD professionals, conciliation of telemedicine with face-to-face appointments, and facilitation of the interaction between patients and employers. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Most patients agreed that maintaining IBD remission is crucial, and only a minority of the patients stopped their treatment as per their own initiative. IBD status only had a small influence on patients’ professional activity during the COVID-19 outbreak, with most changes being related to the pandemic itself.

scholarly journals Malignancy and Mortality in Pediatric-onset Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 732-741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martine A Aardoom ◽  
Maria E Joosse ◽  
Andrica C H de Vries ◽  
Arie Levine ◽  
Lissy de Ridder
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Fatal Outcome ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Specific Information ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Abstract Background Cancer and death are the most severe outcomes that affect patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). These outcomes are even more severe if they occur at a young age but are rare, even in the general population. We conducted a systematic review to provide an overview of all reported pediatric (PIBD) patients with severe outcome. Methods A literature search identified publications that reported development of cancer or fatal outcome in PIBD patients. Studies were eligible for inclusion when (1) article written in English, (2) original data, (3) individual patient information, (4) full text available, (5) study population consisting of patients diagnosed with IBD under the age of 19 years, and (6) who developed malignancy or fatality at any point later in life. Results A total of 98 included studies comprised data of 271 PIBD patients who developed cancer and/or fatal outcome at any point later in life. Meta-analysis demonstrated an increased risk for cancer in PIBD patients (pooled standardized incidence ratio 2.23, 95% CI: 1.98–2.52). The most frequent type of non-fatal cancer was lymphoma, whereas colorectal carcinomas were the most frequently reported type of fatal cancer in PIBD patients and were particularly associated with primary sclerosing cholangitis. The majority of patients with noncancer-related fatal outcomes were diagnosed with ulcerative colitis and most often died due to infectious complications or severe disease-associated complications. Conclusions The data in this review confirm that PIBD associated malignancy and mortality are rare and detailed clinical characteristics are limited. Prospective and international collaborations are needed to obtain more detailed patient-specific information, which is necessary to investigate the relationship between severe outcomes in PIBD patients and the currently used therapeutic strategies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document