scholarly journals Acute Abdomen in Pediatric Patients Admitted to the Pediatric Emergency Department

2008 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 126-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Ching Tseng ◽  
Ming-Sheng Lee ◽  
Yu-Jun Chang ◽  
Han-Ping Wu
2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 326-331
Author(s):  
Ashley McCallister ◽  
Tsz-Yin So ◽  
Josh Stewart

OBJECTIVE This study assessed the efficacy of injectable dexamethasone administered orally in pediatric patients who presented to the emergency department with asthma exacerbation. METHODS This was a retrospective study of patients 0 to 18 years of age who presented to and who were directly discharged from the emergency department at Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital between September 1, 2012, and September 30, 2015, for the diagnosis of asthma or asthma exacerbation. Patients had to receive a onetime dose of injectable dexamethasone orally prior to discharge. Patients were followed for a 30-day period to identify the number of asthma relapses. RESULTS Ninety-nine patients were included in this study. The average weight-based dose ± SD of dexamethasone was 0.35 ± 0.18 mg/kg (range, 0.08–0.62 mg/kg) and the actual dose ± SD was 10.58 ± 1.92 mg (range, 5–16 mg). Over a 30-day period, 6 patients (6%) had one repeated emergency department visit, 6 patients (6%) were admitted to the hospital, and 3 patients (3%) presented to an outpatient clinic for asthma-related symptoms. CONCLUSIONS Injectable dexamethasone administered orally may be an efficacious treatment for asthma exacerbation in pediatric patients. A randomized control trial comparing injectable dexamethasone administered orally to other dexamethasone formulations/routes of administration should be performed to adequately assess the bioequivalence and effectiveness of the former formulation.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun Noh ◽  
Do Kyun Kim ◽  
Jin Hee Lee ◽  
Young Ho Kwak ◽  
Jin Hee Jung ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Won Seok Lee ◽  
Jaewoo An ◽  
Young-Ho Jung ◽  
Hye Mi Jee ◽  
Kyu-Young Chae ◽  
...  

Anaphylaxis is a serious life-threatening allergic disease in children. This study is aimed at determining the characteristics of pediatric patients who experienced anaphylaxis along with treatments administered in order to determine the usefulness of tryptase level assessment as a marker of anaphylaxis in Korean children. A total of 107 patients who were diagnosed with anaphylaxis in a single pediatric emergency center over a 3-year period were included in the study. Patient clinical characteristics, symptoms, signs, allergy history, trigger factors, treatments, and laboratory findings, including serum tryptase levels, were included in the analysis. Food allergies (39.3%) were the most commonly reported patient allergic history, and 58 patients (54.2%) were triggered by food. Among this group, nuts and milk exposure were the most common, affecting 15 patients (25.9%). History of anaphylaxis and asthma were more common in severe anaphylaxis compared to mild or moderate anaphylaxis cases. Epinephrine intramuscular injection was administrated to 76 patients (71.0%), and a self-injectable epinephrine was prescribed to 18 patients (16.8%). The median tryptase level was 4.80 ng/mL (range: 2.70–10.40) which was lower than the 11.4 ng/mL value commonly documented for standard evaluation in adults with anaphylaxis. The most common cause of pediatric anaphylaxis was food including nuts and milk. The rate of epinephrine injection was relatively high in our pediatric emergency department. The median tryptase level associated with anaphylaxis reactions in children was lower than 11.4 ng/mL. Further studies are needed to help improve diagnostic times and treatment accuracy in pediatric patients who develop anaphylaxis.


CJEM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (S1) ◽  
pp. S80-S80 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Ali ◽  
T. McGrath ◽  
N. Dow ◽  
S. Aziz ◽  
M. Pilarski ◽  
...  

Introduction: Measures of satisfaction are essential to understanding patient experience, and pain management. Currently, there are no validated tools to quantify children’s satisfaction. To develop such a tool, we must first understand which words children use to communicate satisfaction. Our objectives were to (A) to identify the words commonly used by children of different ages to communicate satisfaction, in general, and in the context of pain management, and (B) to determine if this vocabulary is similar to that used by their caregiver. Methods: A qualitative study of 105 children-parent pairs, aged 3-16 years, who were evaluated at a pediatric emergency department (PED) from July-November 2014 was conducted. Children were interviewed using a semi-structured format of ten open-ended questions. They were asked to describe their feelings when 1) they received something they wanted/needed, 2) their expectations were met or not met in the ED, and 3) their pain was or was not relieved. A written survey was also completed by the caregiver. Interviews were transcribed and grounded theory was employed for data coding and analysis. Results: 105 child interviews were completed (n=53 female, mean age 9.91 SD 3.71, age range 4-16). 105 caregiver surveys were completed (n=80 female). “Good”, “better,” and “happy” were most commonly used by all children (n=99) to express satisfaction with pain management (27%, 21% and 22%, respectively), with PED care (31%, 14% and 33%) and in general (13%, 5% and 49%). Children (n=99) used the words “sad”, “bad,” and “not good” to communicate dissatisfaction with pain management (21%, 7% and 11% respectively), and with PED care (21%, 13% and 12%, respectively). Only 55% of children understood the meaning of the word ‘satisfaction’. Children used words that were similar to their caregiver 14% of the time. Conclusion: The word “satisfaction” should not be used to communicate with children in the emergency department, as many lack understanding of the term. The vocabulary that children use to describe satisfaction does not largely vary with context and involves simpler words than their parents. Caregiver vocabulary should not be used as a surrogate for pediatric patients. This study will inform the development of a validated tool to measure children’s satisfaction with pain management.


Author(s):  
Emily A. Hartford ◽  
Ashley Keilman ◽  
Hiromi Yoshida ◽  
Russell Migita ◽  
Todd Chang ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT In the midst of a global pandemic, hospitals around the world are working to meet the demand for patients ill with the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused by the novel coronavirus first identified in Wuhan, China. As the crisis unfolds, several countries have reported lower numbers as well as less morbidity and mortality for pediatric patients. Thus, pediatric centers find themselves pivoting from preparing for a patient surge to finding ways to support the regional response for adults. This study describes the response from 2 West Coast freestanding academic children’s hospitals that were among the first cities in the United States impacted during this pandemic.


2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Ilene Claudius ◽  
Chun Nok Lam

Introduction: Recurrent ED utilizers account for a substantial proportion of ED visits, yet little data exists on children with multiple visits. The objective of this study was to compare the need for interventions and triage acuity of recurrent utilizers of a pediatric emergency department to that of non-recurrent utilizers. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of children presenting to a pediatric emergency department. Children were classified as recurrent utilizers if they had 4 or more visits to the ED per year and non-recurrent utilizers if they had less than 4 visits. Data was collected and inter-group comparison performed on critical interventions received (admission, consultation, intravenous fluid therapy, observation, and performance of procedures), all interventions received (including critical interventions as well as laboratories, radiographs, and medications), and triage acuity for the index visit. Results: Two-hundred thirty patients were included, of whom, 15% were classified as recurrent utilizers. This group had significantly lower rates of requiring a critical intervention (8.6% vs. 51.4%, p=.001), lower rates of any intervention (51.4% vs. 74.4%, p=.007), and less urgent triage acuity (3.3 vs. 3.1, p=.029). Conclusions: Recurrent utilizers of the pediatric emergency department had significantly lower need for intervention and less urgent mean triage acuity when compared with non-recurrent utilizers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document