Decent Society, Memory, and Compromise

Author(s):  
Avishai Margalit
Keyword(s):  
Daedalus ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 151 (1) ◽  
pp. 170-180
Author(s):  
Jonathan Simon

Abstract Human dignity as a value to guide criminal justice reform emerged strikingly in the 2011 Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Plata. But with Justice Kennedy retired and courts generally reluctant to go far down the road to practical reforms, its future lies in the political realm shaping policy at the local, state, and national levels. For human dignity to be effective politically and in forming policy, we need a vocabulary robust enough to convey a positive vision for the penal state. In this essay, I discuss three concepts that can provide more precision to the potential abstractness of human dignity, two of which the Supreme Court has regularly used in decisions regarding punishment: the idea of a “decent society,” the idea of a “civilized system of justice,” and the idea of a “condition of dignity.” In brief, without a much broader commitment to restoring a decent society, and to civilizing our justice and security systems, there is little hope that our police stations, courts, jails, and prisons will provide a condition of dignity to those unfortunate enough to end up in them.


Thesis Eleven ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-105
Author(s):  
Claudia Tazreiter
Keyword(s):  

1996 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-48
Author(s):  
Stephen H. Wirls ◽  

This essay explores the relationship between moral community and the principles and practices of liberal individualism. Insofar as these principles afford the widest latitude to the individual's judgment concerning the government of his life, they have contributed to a decay in the rigor and authority of moral and civic codes. Moreover, they and the way of life they foster seem to militate against any political or social solutions to problems of morality and civility, reflecting a disparity between liberal regime principles and the moral preconditions of a decent society. A moral revival may thus have to be founded on the recognition that healthy liberal democracies require policies and practices in tension with liberal principles.


2012 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 261-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Clare Roberts

In his recent book on Strauss, Steven B. Smith has called attention to “a curiously neglected passage from the very center of Natural Right and History,” a passage in which Strauss “acknowledges the way political decisions grow out of concrete situations and cannot be deduced from a priori rules.” The passage reads: Let us call an extreme situation a situation in which the very existence or independence of a society is at stake. In extreme situations there may be conflicts between what the self-preservation of society requires and the requirements of commutative and distributive justice. In such situations, and only in such situations, it can justly be said that the public safety is the highest law. A decent society will not go to war except for a just cause. But what it will do during a war will depend to a certain extent on what the enemy—possibly an absolutely unscrupulous and savage enemy—forces it to do. There are no limits which can be defined in advance, there are no assignable limits to what might become just reprisals.


2004 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-97
Author(s):  
Robert Krause
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger Sapsford ◽  
Pamela Abbott ◽  
Claire Wallace
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document