The Law of the Sea as Part of the Climate-Change Regime Complex

Author(s):  
Ingvild Ulrikke Jakobsen ◽  
Elise Johansen ◽  
Philipp Peter Nickels
Author(s):  
Suzanne Lalonde ◽  
Ronald St. J. MacDonald

SummaryThe Arctic, long neglected, has been thrust into the limelight as climate change dramatically transforms its landscape. The ice, which for centuries has acted as a powerful barrier keeping the world at bay, is melting at an alarming rate. The promise of greater accessibility to the region inevitably raises a host of important issues. Donat Pharand, an internationally renowned scholar, has dedicated his long and illustrious career to researching and understanding the legal issues pertaining to Canada's claim over the waters of the Arctic archipelago. This article chronicles the key events in his life and examines Pharand's profound contribution to the law of the sea of the Arctic.


2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 831-838 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Boyle

Abstract The Law of the Sea Convention was negotiated at a time when climate change was not yet part of the international environmental agenda. Nevertheless, it is not a static or immutable legal regime and it is not difficult to apply Part XII to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and climate change insofar as they affect the marine environment. However, it is doubtful whether viewing climate change from the perspective of the law of the marine environment greatly alters the overall picture. At best it provides a vehicle for compulsory dispute settlement notably lacking in the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) regime. Realistically, while the 1982 Convention may import any newly agreed standards for the control of GHGs, it is not a substitute for further agreement within the UNFCCC framework.


Subject Brexit and fisheries. Significance Brexit has been portrayed by many in the fishing industry as a great opportunity, but it poses significant challenges for the industry and government, especially in terms of exports and devolution. Impacts A no-deal Brexit will result in more fish being caught by UK fishermen and lower fish prices. The United Kingdom is a signatory of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and will have to continue to meet its obligations after Brexit. The United Kingdom will need to work closely with other coastal states to manage the effects of climate change on fish migration.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 133-157
Author(s):  
Vladyslav Lanovoy ◽  
Sally O’Donnell

Abstract This article examines the challenges that climate change and sea-level rise pose to certain key aspects of the law of the sea. Sea-level rise is likely to impact maritime baselines, the qualification of maritime features and the entitlements they generate, and ultimately the stability of maritime boundaries, which are critical for the peaceful co-existence of sovereign States. This article examines whether some of the relevant provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea can accommodate a liberal interpretation so as to provide some, even if incomplete, answers to the challenges posed by sea-level rise to the law of the sea regime. It is argued that the legal fiction of permanency that underpins key elements of this legal regime, and thus ignores future physical changes to coastlines, is the most appropriate temporary solution, unless and until new rules are agreed by States to deal comprehensively with sea-level rise.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document