Impact of number of lumens in central-venous catheters on central-line bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk in patients with acute leukemia

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Alina Varabyeva ◽  
Christabel Pui-See Lo ◽  
Adamo Brancaccio ◽  
Anthony J. Perissinotti ◽  
Twisha Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Acute Leukemia ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter ◽  
Central Catheter ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Double Lumen

Abstract This retrospective study was conducted to determine whether the number of peripherally inserted central-catheter lumens affected the rate of central-line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) in adult patients with acute leukemia. The results show that CLABSI rates were not significantly different between patients with triple-lumen or double-lumen PICCs (22.1% vs 23.4%; P = .827).

Comparison of central-line–associated bloodstream infections between central venous catheters lined by combined chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine versus silver ionotrophes alone: A before–after–before retrospective study

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youssef Z. Abouleish ◽  
Edward C. Oldfield ◽  
Paul E. Marik
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Silver Sulfadiazine ◽  
Central Venous

Abstract A before–after–before direct comparison between catheters lined with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine (CHSS) versus silver ionotrophes (SI) with a primary objective of comparison of rate of central-line–associated infection (CLABSI) in three 10-month windows. The CHSS catheters were associated with a lower rate of CLABSI.

scholarly journals Impact of Critical Care Consultation Requests for Avoidable Central Venous Catheters on Medical-Surgical Units

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s258-s258
Author(s):  
Madhuri Tirumandas ◽  
Theresa Madaline ◽  
Gregory David Weston ◽  
Ruchika Jain ◽  
Jamie Figueredo
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
High Risk Population ◽  
Central Venous

Background: Although central-line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) in US hospitals have improved in the last decade, ~30,100 CLABSIs occur annually.1,2 Central venous catheters (CVC) carry a high risk of infections and should be limited to appropriate clinical indications.6,7 Montefiore Medical Center, a large, urban, academic medical center in the Bronx, serves a high-risk population with multiple comobidities.8–11 Despite this, the critical care medicine (CCM) team is often consulted to place a CVC when a peripheral intravenous line (PIV) cannot be obtained by nurses or primary providers. We evaluated the volume of CCM consultation requests for avoidable CVCs and related CLABSIs. Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed for patients with CCM consultation requests for CVC placement between July and October 2019. The indication for CVC, type of catheter inserted or recommended, and NHSN data were used to identify CLABSIs. CVCs were considered avoidable if a PIV was used for the stated indication and duration of therapy, with no anatomical contraindications to PIV in nonemergencies, according to the Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC).6Results: Of 229 total CCM consults, 4 (18%) requests were for CVC placement; 21 consultations (9%) were requested for avoidable CVCs. Of 40 CVC requests, 18 (45%) resulted in CVC placement by the CCM team, 4 (10%) were deferred for nonurgent PICC by interventional radiology, and 18 (45%) were deferred in favor of PIV or no IV. Indications for CVC insertion included emergent chemotherapy (n = 8, 44%) and dialysis (n = 3, 16%), vasopressors (n = 3, 16%), antibiotics (n = 2, 11%) and blood transfusion (n = 2, 11%). Of 18 CVCs, 9 (50%) were potentially avoidable: 2 short-term antibiotics and rest for nonemergent indications; 2 blood transfusions, 1 dialysis, 2 chemotherapy and 2 vasopressors. Between July and October 2019, 6 CLABSIs occurred in CVCs placed by the CCM team; in 3 of 6 CLABSI events (50%), the CVC was avoidable. Conclusions: More than half of consultation requests to the CCM team for CVCs are avoidable, and they disproportionately contribute to CLABSI events. Alternatives for intravenous access could potentially avoid 9% of CCM consultations and 50% of CLABSIs in CCM-inserted CVCs on medical-surgical wards.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

The Effect of Multiple Concurrent Central Venous Catheters on Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections

2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. S54-S55
Author(s):  
Cathleen Concannon ◽  
Edwin van Wijngaarden ◽  
Vanessa Stevens ◽  
Kelly Thevenet-Morrison ◽  
Ghinwa Dumyati
Keyword(s):  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Central Venous

The Influence of an Antimicrobial Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter on Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in a Hospital Environment

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 172-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenell S. Rutkoff
Keyword(s):  
Infection Rate ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Hospital Environment ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter ◽  
Central Catheter ◽  
Specific Patient

Abstract Background: Federal agencies such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have mandated reduction of hospital-acquired infections and recommended the use of antimicrobial catheters in clinical settings where central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates have remained high. The Infusion Nurses Society also recommends antimicrobial catheters for specific patient populations. At a California hospital, evidence-based infection prevention strategies for CLABSI prevention had been in effect for several years, but the CLABSI rate remained at an unacceptable level. For this reason, the effect of an antimicrobial peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) on the incidence of CLABSI was studied. Methods: A quasiexperimental design was used with concurrent data collection on patients in an intervention group who received an antimicrobial PICC. Retrospective data were collected for patients in a nonintervention group who received nonantimicrobial PICCs the previous year. Results: The 257 patients in the nonintervention group experienced 8 CLABSIs with an infection rate of 4.18/1,000 line days. The 260 subjects in the intervention group experienced 1 CLABSI with an infection rate of 0.47/1,000 line days. The decrease in the number of infections per 1,000 line days for the intervention group was statistically significant. Conclusions: The use of an antimicrobial PICC in conjunction with current infection prevention practices resulted in a statistically significant decrease in infection rate, which supports the recommendation for continued use of antimicrobial catheters. Treatment cost savings, which overcame the higher initial cost for the devices, were found to be an additional benefit of using antimicrobial catheters.

Incidence of catheter-related thrombosis in acute leukemia patients: a comparative, retrospective study of the safety of peripherally inserted vs. centrally inserted central venous catheters

2016 ◽  
Vol 95 (12) ◽  
pp. 2057-2064 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Refaei ◽  
Bruna Fernandes ◽  
Joseph Brandwein ◽  
Marilyn Dawn Goodyear ◽  
Arun Pokhrel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Acute Leukemia ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Catheter Related Thrombosis

Risk factors for central line–associated bloodstream infections in children with tunneled central venous catheters

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-39
Author(s):  
Paolo Paioni ◽  
Sereina Kuhn ◽  
Yvonne Strässle ◽  
Burkhardt Seifert ◽  
Christoph Berger
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Central Venous
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document