AMS 14C Dating of Bones from Archaeological Sites in Mexico

Radiocarbon ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 1945-1954 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Solis ◽  
G Pérez-Andrade ◽  
M Rodríguez-Ceja ◽  
E Solís-Meza ◽  
T Méndez ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTCollagen associated with bone samples is frequently used for radiocarbon (14C) dating of bones recovered from archaeological sites. However, submersion and exposure to moisture favors the degradation of collagen, which leads to difficulty in reliably dating bones from tropical, humid, or previously submerged archaeological sites. In this paper, we characterized the preservation state of a series of bones, through parameters such as %C, %N, C/N ratio, and collagen recovery. We performed 14C analyses of three collagen fractions obtained through the pretreatment steps (total, ultrafiltered, and insoluble collagen) in order to link the preservation state and the reproducibility of 14C values obtained from the three fractions. Collagen ultrafiltration resulted in a decrease of C/N ratio, although collagen yield was reduced. When two or three collagen fractions were obtained, ages were reproducible and consistent with expected values, according to archaeological or hydrogeological criteria. The pretreatment steps were monitored by infrared spectroscopy in order to analyze the collagen fractions at the molecular level. The presence of collagen in the total and insoluble fractions was confirmed. Since many of the Mexican samples had poor ultrafiltered collagen yield (<3%) or nonexistent yield, our results show that if additional contextual information is carefully considered, the remnant collagen in the total and insoluble fraction can be dated, especially from sites where no other datable fraction exists.




1993 ◽  
Vol 99 (10) ◽  
pp. 787-798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masafumi Murayama ◽  
Eiji Matsumoto ◽  
Toshio Nakamura ◽  
Makoto Okamura ◽  
Hisato Yasuda ◽  
...  


Lab on a Chip ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Perez-Guaita ◽  
Zack Richardson ◽  
G. Quintas ◽  
Julia Kuligowski ◽  
Diana Eva Bedolla ◽  
...  

Infrared Spectroscopy (IR) enables the direct and rapid characterization of cells at the molecular level. Achieving a rapid and consistent cell preparation is critical for the development of Point-of-Care diagnostics...



2020 ◽  
Vol 748 ◽  
pp. 141359
Author(s):  
Chengcheng Liu ◽  
Hong Yan ◽  
Haobai Fei ◽  
Ge Shi ◽  
Peng Cheng ◽  
...  




Author(s):  
Bente Philippsen ◽  
Henrik Kjeldsen ◽  
Sönke Hartz ◽  
Harm Paulsen ◽  
Ingo Clausen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  




2005 ◽  
Vol 176 (3) ◽  
pp. 249-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe Innocent ◽  
Christine Flehoc ◽  
Francis Lemeille

Abstract Shells extracted from loess deposits at Achenheim (Rhine Graben) have been investigated for AMS 14C and for U-Th dating by the isochron method on single shells. The two chronometers provide results that are not in agreement : the obtained 14C date is 38 ka B.P. In contrast, U-Th results provide much older ages. The 238U/232Th –230Th/232Th isochron diagram gives an age of 69 kyr, whereas a slightly younger age of 64 kyr is derived from the other, 234U/232Th – 230Th/232Th, diagram. 234U/238U ratios have not been found to vary from a shell to another : the average value is 1.199, slightly higher than radioactive equilibrium. For both isochrons, the Y-axis intercept is slightly negative, which indicates that there is no evidence for a significant detrital component. Thorium 232 that is present in the shells is probably incorporated in the material. The negative intercepts suggest that the two ages have been probably “aged” resulting from a slight mobilisation of uranium. By constraining the Y-axis intercepts at 0, ages that are in good agreement from one to another, can be calculated at 60.9 kyr and 60.4 kyr, respectively. In both cases, the statistical quality of the alignment is only slightly deteriorated. Since U-Th ages are in agreement with stratigraphic data, in contrast to the 14C date, one may believe that they date the end of early diagenesis, with uranium trapping. In contrast, the AMS 14C date is either thought to reflect analytical limitations of AMS 14C dating for such type of material, or to date a younger geologic event. In this latter case, a possible hypothesis is that this event has triggered the slight opening of the 238U – 234U system. In any case, this study demonstrates once again that surface formations often tell such complex stories that only one single dating method cannot usually be sufficient to describe precisely these histories. Instead, informations derived from different independent chronometers have to be compared.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document