scholarly journals A decision problem for varieties of commutative semigroups

1993 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 457-464
Author(s):  
W.L. Cao
Keyword(s):  
Decision Problem ◽  
Commutative Semigroups ◽  
First Order ◽  
Finite Set ◽  
Semigroup Identities

For a first order formula P: ∀x1, …, ∀xn, ∃y1, …, ∃ym (u(x1, …, xn, y1, …, ym) ≡ v(x1, …, xn, y1, …, ym)) where u and v are two words on the alphabet {x1, …, xn, y1, …, ym}, and a finite set E of semigroup identities with xy ≡ yx in it, we prove that it is decidable whether P follows from E, that is whether all the semigroups in the variety defined by E satisfy P.

scholarly journals Finite representability of semigroups with demonic refinement

2021 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Hirsch ◽  
Jaš Šemrl
Keyword(s):  
Partial Order ◽  
Turing Machines ◽  
Binary Relations ◽  
Finite Representation ◽  
First Order ◽  
Finite Structures ◽  
Finite Base ◽  
Finite Set ◽  
Finite Representability ◽  
Representation Class

AbstractThe motivation for using demonic calculus for binary relations stems from the behaviour of demonic turing machines, when modelled relationally. Relational composition (; ) models sequential runs of two programs and demonic refinement ($$\sqsubseteq $$ ⊑ ) arises from the partial order given by modeling demonic choice ($$\sqcup $$ ⊔ ) of programs (see below for the formal relational definitions). We prove that the class $$R(\sqsubseteq , ;)$$ R ( ⊑ , ; ) of abstract $$(\le , \circ )$$ ( ≤ , ∘ ) structures isomorphic to a set of binary relations ordered by demonic refinement with composition cannot be axiomatised by any finite set of first-order $$(\le , \circ )$$ ( ≤ , ∘ ) formulas. We provide a fairly simple, infinite, recursive axiomatisation that defines $$R(\sqsubseteq , ;)$$ R ( ⊑ , ; ) . We prove that a finite representable $$(\le , \circ )$$ ( ≤ , ∘ ) structure has a representation over a finite base. This appears to be the first example of a signature for binary relations with composition where the representation class is non-finitely axiomatisable, but where the finite representation property holds for finite structures.

THE DS/AHP METHOD UNDER PARTIAL INFORMATION ABOUT CRITERIA AND ALTERNATIVES BY SEVERAL LEVELS OF CRITERIA

2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (02) ◽  
pp. 307-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
LEV V. UTKIN ◽  
NATALIA V. SIMANOVA
Keyword(s):  
Linear Programming ◽  
Incomplete Information ◽  
Decision Problem ◽  
Partial Information ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
Numerical Examples ◽  
Finite Set ◽  
Linear Programming Problems ◽  
Decision Alternatives

An extension of the DS/AHP method is proposed in the paper. It takes into account the fact that the multi-criteria decision problem might have several levels of criteria. Moreover, it is assumed that expert judgments concerning the criteria are imprecise and incomplete. The proposed extension also uses groups of experts or decision makers for comparing decision alternatives and criteria. However, it does not require assigning favorability values for groups of decision alternatives and criteria. The computation procedure for processing and aggregating the incomplete information about criteria and decision alternatives is reduced to solving a finite set of linear programming problems. Numerical examples explain in detail and illustrate the proposed approach.

Church’s theorem and the decision problem

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohit Parikh
Keyword(s):  
Decision Problem ◽  
Combinatorial Problem ◽  
Order Logic ◽  
First Order Logic ◽  
Negative Solution ◽  
Great Contribution ◽  
Solvable Problem ◽  
First Order ◽  
Mathematical Definition ◽  
Definition Of

Church’s theorem, published in 1936, states that the set of valid formulas of first-order logic is not effectively decidable: there is no method or algorithm for deciding which formulas of first-order logic are valid. Church’s paper exhibited an undecidable combinatorial problem P and showed that P was representable in first-order logic. If first-order logic were decidable, P would also be decidable. Since P is undecidable, first-order logic must also be undecidable. Church’s theorem is a negative solution to the decision problem (Entscheidungsproblem), the problem of finding a method for deciding whether a given formula of first-order logic is valid, or satisfiable, or neither. The great contribution of Church (and, independently, Turing) was not merely to prove that there is no method but also to propose a mathematical definition of the notion of ‘effectively solvable problem’, that is, a problem solvable by means of a method or algorithm.

scholarly journals On a Propositional Calculus Whose Decision Problem is Recursively Unsolvable

1970 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. 145-152
Author(s):  
Akira Nakamura
Keyword(s):  
Decision Problem ◽  
Propositional Calculus ◽  
Predicate Calculus ◽  
Reduction Theorem ◽  
List Type ◽  
First Order ◽  
Order Predicate Calculus

The purpose of this paper is to present a propositional calculus whose decision problem is recursively unsolvable. The paper is based on the following ideas: (1) Using Löwenheim-Skolem’s Theorem and Surányi’s Reduction Theorem, we will construct an infinitely many-valued propositional calculus corresponding to the first-order predicate calculus.(2) It is well known that the decision problem of the first-order predicate calculus is recursively unsolvable.(3) Thus it will be shown that the decision problem of the infinitely many-valued propositional calculus is recursively unsolvable.

On the reduction of the decision problem. First paper. Ackermann prefix, a single binary predicate

1939 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
László Kalmár
Keyword(s):  
Decision Problem ◽  
Reduction Process ◽  
The Other ◽  
First Order ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Special Cases ◽  
Binary Predicate ◽  
Ternary Variables ◽  
Order Predicate Calculus ◽  
Predicate Variable

1. Although the decision problem of the first order predicate calculus has been proved by Church to be unsolvable by any (general) recursive process, perhaps it is not superfluous to investigate the possible reductions of the general problem to simple special cases of it. Indeed, the situation after Church's discovery seems to be analogous to that in algebra after the Ruffini-Abel theorem; and investigations on the reduction of the decision problem might prepare the way for a theory in logic, analogous to that of Galois.It has been proved by Ackermann that any first order formula is equivalent to another having a prefix of the form(1) (Ex1)(x2)(Ex3)(x4)…(xm).On the other hand, I have proved that any first order formula is equivalent to some first order formula containing a single, binary, predicate variable. In the present paper, I shall show that both results can be combined; more explicitly, I shall prove theTheorem. To any given first order formula it is possible to construct an equivalent one with a prefix of the form (1) and a matrix containing no other predicate variable than a single binary one.2. Of course, this theorem cannot be proved by a mere application of the Ackermann reduction method and mine, one after the other. Indeed, Ackermann's method requires the introduction of three auxiliary predicate variables, two of them being ternary variables; on the other hand, my reduction process leads to a more complicated prefix, viz.,(2) (Ex1)…(Exm)(xm+1)(xm+2)(Exm+3)(Exm+4).

scholarly journals THE VARIETY OF COSET RELATION ALGEBRAS

2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (04) ◽  
pp. 1595-1609 ◽  
Author(s):  
STEVEN GIVANT ◽  
HAJNAL ANDRÉKA
Keyword(s):  
Large Class ◽  
Identity Element ◽  
Relation Algebra ◽  
Order Theory ◽  
Relation Algebras ◽  
First Order ◽  
First Order Theory ◽  
Atomic Pair ◽  
Finite Set ◽  
Image Position

AbstractGivant [6] generalized the notion of an atomic pair-dense relation algebra from Maddux [13] by defining the notion of a measurable relation algebra, that is to say, a relation algebra in which the identity element is a sum of atoms that can be measured in the sense that the “size” of each such atom can be defined in an intuitive and reasonable way (within the framework of the first-order theory of relation algebras). In Andréka--Givant [2], a large class of examples of such algebras is constructed from systems of groups, coordinated systems of isomorphisms between quotients of the groups, and systems of cosets that are used to “shift” the operation of relative multiplication. In Givant--Andréka [8], it is shown that the class of these full coset relation algebras is adequate to the task of describing all measurable relation algebras in the sense that every atomic and complete measurable relation algebra is isomorphic to a full coset relation algebra.Call an algebra $\mathfrak{A}$ a coset relation algebra if $\mathfrak{A}$ is embeddable into some full coset relation algebra. In the present article, it is shown that the class of coset relation algebras is equationally axiomatizable (that is to say, it is a variety), but that no finite set of sentences suffices to axiomatize the class (that is to say, the class is not finitely axiomatizable).

The decision problem for standard classes

1976 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 460-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuri Gurevich
Keyword(s):  
Decision Problem ◽  
Predicate Logic ◽  
Order Theory ◽  
First Order ◽  
First Order Theory

The standard classes of a first-order theory T are certain classes of prenex T-sentences defined by restrictions on prefix, number of monadic, dyadic, etc. predicate variables, and number of monadic, dyadic, etc. operation variables. In [3] it is shown that, for any theory T, (1) the decision problem for any class of prenex T-sentences specified by such restrictions reduces to that for the standard classes, and (2) there are finitely many standard classes K1, …, Kn such that any undecidable standard class contains one of K1, …, Kn. These results give direction to the study of the decision problem.Below T is predicate logic with identity and operation variables. The Main Theorem solves the decision problem for the standard classes admitting at least one operation variable.

scholarly journals The structure of first-order causality

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
SAMUEL MIMRAM
Keyword(s):  
Programming Languages ◽  
Propositional Logic ◽  
Monoidal Category ◽  
Denotational Semantics ◽  
Generators And Relations ◽  
First Order ◽  
Game Semantics ◽  
Finite Set ◽  
Categorical Algebra ◽  
Interactive Behaviour

Game semantics describe the interactive behaviour of proofs by interpreting formulas as games on which proofs induce strategies. Such a semantics is introduced here for capturing dependencies induced by quantifications in first-order propositional logic. One of the main difficulties that has to be faced during the elaboration of this kind of semantics is to characterise definable strategies, that is, strategies that actually behave like a proof. This is usually done by restricting the model to strategies satisfying subtle combinatorial conditions, whose preservation under composition is often difficult to show. In this paper we present an original methodology to achieve this task, which requires a combination of advanced tools from game semantics, rewriting theory and categorical algebra. We introduce a diagrammatic presentation of the monoidal category of definable strategies of our model using generators and relations: these strategies can be generated from a finite set of atomic strategies, and the equality between strategies admits a finite axiomatisation, and this equational structure corresponds to a polarised variation of the bialgebra notion. The work described in this paper thus forms a bridge between algebra and denotational semantics in order to reveal the structure of dependencies induced by first-order quantifiers, and lays the foundations for a mechanised analysis of causality in programming languages.

Decidable properties of finite sets of equations in trivial languages

1984 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 1333-1338
Author(s):  
Cornelia Kalfa
Keyword(s):  
Equational Theory ◽  
Order Theory ◽  
Operation Symbol ◽  
First Order ◽  
First Order Theory ◽  
Order Language ◽  
Finite Set ◽  
Joint Embedding ◽  
Algebraic Language ◽  
Joint Embedding Property

In [4] I proved that in any nontrivial algebraic language there are no algorithms which enable us to decide whether a given finite set of equations Σ has each of the following properties except P2 (for which the problem is open):P0(Σ) = the equational theory of Σ is equationally complete.P1(Σ) = the first-order theory of Σ is complete.P2(Σ) = the first-order theory of Σ is model-complete.P3(Σ) = the first-order theory of the infinite models of Σ is complete.P4(Σ) = the first-order theory of the infinite models of Σ is model-complete.P5(Σ) = Σ has the joint embedding property.In this paper I prove that, in any finite trivial algebraic language, such algorithms exist for all the above Pi's. I make use of Ehrenfeucht's result [2]: The first-order theory generated by the logical axioms of any trivial algebraic language is decidable. The results proved here are part of my Ph.D. thesis [3]. I thank Wilfrid Hodges, who supervised it.Throughout the paper is a finite trivial algebraic language, i.e. a first-order language with equality, with one operation symbol f of rank 1 and at most finitely many constant symbols.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document