Fermentation of goat's milk by two DL-type mixed strain starters

1983 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 349-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunnar Rysstad ◽  
Roger K. Abrahamsen
Keyword(s):  
Milk Production ◽  
Initial Level ◽  
Cow’S Milk ◽  
Cow's Milk ◽  
Goat’S Milk ◽  
Goat's Milk ◽  
Fermented Products

SummaryVariations in the biochemical performance of 2 DL-type mixed strain starters CH 01 and FDn grown in a sample of skimmed goat's milk I (obtained 2–3 weeks after parturition) and of goat's milk II (8 months after parturition) were studied, and results compared with those of the cultures grown in skimmed cow's milk. The initial levels of citrate differed in the 3 milks, with goat's milk II containing 0·7 mg/ml, goat's milk I 1·4 mg/ml and cow's milk 1·8 mg/ml. The production of diacetyl, α-acetolactic acid and acetoin was very low in goat's milk II. In goat's milk I the production of these compounds was higher, but still considerably lower than in cow's milk. Production of ethanol (EtOH) was similar in the 3 milks incubated with starter CH 01, but with FDn the production of EtOH was distinctly higher in goat's milk II. The total amount of CO2produced corresponded with the initial level of citrate; consequently the highest production was found in cow's milk and the lowest in goat's milk II. The use of different starters for fermented products made from goat's milk in early and late lactation is suggested.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Physicochemical Quality of Raw Bovine and Goat Milk Marketed in the Steppic Region of Djelfa (Algeria)

2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Mourad HAMIROUNE ◽  
Sounia DAHMANI ◽  
Zineb KASMI ◽  
Abdelhamid FOUGHALIA ◽  
Mahmoud DJEMAL
Keyword(s):  
Freezing Point ◽  
Bovine Milk ◽  
Goat Milk ◽  
Raw Milk ◽  
Cow’S Milk ◽  
Physicochemical Quality ◽  
Cow's Milk ◽  
Goat’S Milk ◽  
Disciplinary Procedures ◽  
Goat's Milk

This research was conducted to study the key physicochemical parameters of samples of raw bovine and goat milk collected in the steppic region of Djelfa. One hundred and six samples of raw milk were collected from April 2018 to May 2018, at points of sale and analyzed. The results showed that cow’s milk had 3.66±0.89% fat, 11.4±1.56% solid not fat, 4.35±0.61% protein, 6.35±0.89% lactose and a density of 1.0360±0.0056 with a freezing point of -0.380±0.053 °C. While goat’s milk had 3.43±0.65% fat, 10.2±0.92% solid not fat, 3.88±0.36% protein, 5.66±0.52% lactose and a density of 1.0317±0.0035 with a freezing point of -0.348±0.044 °C. This proves that cow’s milk has a slightly higher physicochemical quality than goat’s milk. In addition, the present study showed that 100% raw goat milk is wet against 97.1% raw bovine milk. This indicates the presence of cases of fraud requiring disciplinary procedures. Moreover, in the majority of the cases, the storage temperatures of the milk far exceed the values recommended by the Algerian standards (+6°C). It is necessary to establish a program of control and popularization of all the actors of the sector in order to improve the quality and the quantity of raw milk produced.

Indirect enzyme‐linked Immunosorbent assay for detection of cow's milk in goat's milk

1992 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Castro ◽  
R. Martín ◽  
T. García ◽  
E. Rodríguez ◽  
I. González ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Cow’S Milk ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Cow's Milk ◽  
Goat’S Milk ◽  
Goat's Milk

scholarly journals Determination of whey proteins in different types of milk

2014 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lenka Ruprichová ◽  
Michaela Králová ◽  
Ivana Borkovcová ◽  
Lenka Vorlová ◽  
Iveta Bedáňová
Keyword(s):  
High Performance ◽  
Dairy Product ◽  
Whey Proteins ◽  
Reversed Phase ◽  
Cow’S Milk ◽  
Cow's Milk ◽  
Goat’S Milk ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Goat's Milk ◽  
Β Lactoglobulin

Protein analysis is very important both in terms of milk protein allergy, and of milk and dairy product adulteration (β-lactoglobulin may be an important marker in the detection of milk adulteration). The aim of this study was to detect major whey proteins α-lactalbumin and β-lactoglobulin and their genetic variants by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Milk samples from cows (n = 40), goats (n = 40) and sheep (n = 40) were collected at two farms and milk bars in the Czech Republic from April to June 2010. The concentration of α-lactalbumin was higher in goat’s milk (1.27 ± 0.05 g·l-1, P < 0.001) and cow’s milk (1.16 ± 0.02 g·l-1, P = 0.0037) compared to sheep’s milk (0.95 ± 0.06 g·l-1); however, concentration of α-lactalbumin in goat’s milk and cow’s milk did not differ significantly (P < 0.05). Goat’s milk contained less β-lactoglobulin (3.07 ± 0.08 g·l-1) compared to cow’s milk (4.10 ± 0.04 g·l-1, P < 0.001) or sheep’s milk (5.97 ± 0.24 g·l-1, P < 0.001). A highly significant positive correlation (r = 0.8686; P < 0.001) was found between fraction A and B of β-lactoglobulin in sheep’s milk, whereas in cow’s milk there was a negative correlation (r = -0.3010; P = 0.0296). This study summarizes actual information of the whey protein content in different types of milk which may be relevant in assessing their allergenic potential.

Detection of cow's milk in goat's milk by gel electrophoresis

1968 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 383-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Aschaffenburg ◽  
Janet E. Dance
Keyword(s):  
Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Cow’S Milk ◽  
Cow's Milk ◽  
Goat’S Milk ◽  
Goat's Milk

Hypersensitivity to cow's milk is not uncommon in humans, particularly babies and infants. Those afflicted may be found to tolerate goat's milk which, in this country, commands a considerably higher price than cow's milk. For economic as well as ethical reasons it is therefore desirable to ascertain that goat's milk offered for sale is free from admixtures of cow's milk. Tests should be sensitive to relatively minor admixtures, since even small additions of cow's milk may undo the benefit which hypersensitive subjects expect to derive from the consumption of goat's milk.

Goat's milk allergy without cow's milk allergy: suppression of non-cross-reactive epitopes on caprine β-casein

2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 602-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Hazebrouck ◽  
S. Ah-Leung ◽  
E. Bidat ◽  
E. Paty ◽  
M.-F. Drumare ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cow’S Milk Allergy ◽  
Cow’S Milk ◽  
Milk Allergy ◽  
Cow's Milk ◽  
Cow's Milk Allergy ◽  
Goat’S Milk ◽  
Goat's Milk

Ass's milk in children with atopic dermatitis and cow's milk allergy: Crossover comparison with goat's milk

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 594-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Vita ◽  
Giovanni Passalacqua ◽  
Giuseppe Di Pasquale ◽  
Lucia Caminiti ◽  
Giuseppe Crisafulli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atopic Dermatitis ◽  
Cow’S Milk Allergy ◽  
Cow’S Milk ◽  
Milk Allergy ◽  
Cow's Milk ◽  
Cow's Milk Allergy ◽  
Goat’S Milk ◽  
Goat's Milk ◽  
Crossover Comparison

Detection of cow’s milk in Shaanxi goat’s milk with an ELISA assay

Food Control ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 883-887 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongxin Song ◽  
Haiyan Xue ◽  
Yan Han
Keyword(s):  
Cow’S Milk ◽  
Elisa Assay ◽  
Cow's Milk ◽  
Goat’S Milk ◽  
Goat's Milk

Goat’s Milk, Plant-based Milk, Cow’s Milk, and Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D Levels in Early Childhood

Epidemiology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. e29-e31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grace J. Lee ◽  
Catherine S. Birken ◽  
Patricia C. Parkin ◽  
Gerald Lebovic ◽  
Yang Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Early Childhood ◽  
Cow’S Milk ◽  
Cow's Milk ◽  
Hydroxyvitamin D ◽  
Goat’S Milk ◽  
25 Hydroxyvitamin D ◽  
Goat's Milk

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Physicochemical Properties and Sensory Attributes of Yoghurt Made from Mixtures of Goat’s and Cow’s Milks

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 426-433
Author(s):  
Nguyen Duc Doan
Keyword(s):  
Physicochemical Properties ◽  
Ph Value ◽  
Sensory Attributes ◽  
Water Holding Capacity ◽  
Cow’S Milk ◽  
Total Solids ◽  
Cow's Milk ◽  
Goat’S Milk ◽  
Goat's Milk ◽  
Water Holding

The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of cow’s milk added to goat’s milk on physicochemical properties and sensory attributes of yoghurt. Yoghurts prepared from five different proportions of cow’s milk and goat’s milk were stored at 4-6ºC for 1, 7, and 14 days and then evaluated for their physicochemical (total solids, protein, pH, and acidity) and physical properties (viscosity and water holding capacity), and sensory characteristics (acceptability). The total solids of the evaluated yoghurts significantly increased, but the protein content decreased when the amount of cow’s milk increased in the mixtures of milk. The results showed that the pH value of the yoghurt made from only goat’s milk was higher, while the titratable acidity was lower than those of the yoghurts made from the mixtures of goat’s and cow’s milks. The yoghurt obtained from the mixture of milks containing 80% goat’s milk and 20% cow’s milk exhibited the highest viscosity and water holding capacity among the evaluated yoghurts. All the yoghurts received similar scores for color, odor, and texture after all periods of storage, while the highest score in terms of flavor was received for the yoghurt made from the mixture of milks containing 60% goat’s milk and 40% cow’s milk. Addition of cow’s milk to goat’s milk was shown to significantly contribute to the viscosity, water holding capacity, and flavor of the resulting yoghurts.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document