scholarly journals A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in paediatric otolaryngology

2017 ◽  
Vol 132 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Powell ◽  
S Powell ◽  
A Robson
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
English Language ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Paediatric Population ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Specific Patient ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Impact

AbstractBackground:Recently, there has been increased emphasis on the development and application of patient-reported outcome measures. This drive to assess the impact of illness or interventions, from the patient's perspective, has resulted in a greater number of available questionnaires. The importance of selecting an appropriate patient-reported outcome measure is specifically emphasised in the paediatric population. The literature on patient-reported outcome measures used in paediatric otolaryngology was reviewed.Methods:A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the databases Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and PsycInfo, using the terms: ‘health assessment questionnaire’, ‘structured questionnaire’, ‘questionnaire’, ‘patient reported outcome measures’, ‘PROM’, ‘quality of life’ or ‘survey’, and ‘children’ or ‘otolaryngology’. The search was limited to English-language articles published between 1996 and 2016.Results:The search yielded 656 articles, of which 63 were considered relevant. This included general paediatric patient-reported outcome measures applied to otolaryngology, and paediatric otolaryngology disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures.Conclusion:A large collection of patient-reported outcome measures are described in the paediatric otolaryngology literature. Greater standardisation of the patient-reported outcome measures used in paediatric otolaryngology would assist in pooling of data and increase the validation of tools used.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Inform Care of People With Dementia—A Systematic Scoping Review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darshini R Ayton ◽  
Madeleine L Gardam ◽  
Elizabeth K Pritchard ◽  
Rasa Ruseckaite ◽  
Joanne Ryan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
System Level ◽  
Patient’S Perspective ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background and Objectives Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) captures the patient’s perspective regarding quality of life, daily functioning, symptom severity, and overall health, and how these may be impacted by health care or other interventions. PROMs are used in clinical quality registries (CQRs) for a number of diseases to assess the patient’s perspective of the impact of clinical care on quality-of-life. This scoping review aimed to identify dementia-specific PROMs, determine how the PROMs are being used, and whether they are used within dementia registries. Research Design and Methods Three electronic databases were searched using Medical Subject Heading terms for dementia, quality of life, and patient-reported outcomes. Data were extracted on the PROMs used and the methods and mode of administering the PROM. Results Seven dementia-specific PROMs were identified, however none were used in a dementia registry. All the PROMs were used at the patient level to identify patient needs and health service impacts. Three PROMs were also used at a system level to examine difference in care models. The majority of the PROMs were administered via a researcher or clinician and were predominantly completed by a proxy. Discussion and Implications PROMs provide an opportunity for a patient with dementia to share experiences and perspectives of care. A number of dementia-specific PROMs exist, yet none are used in dementia registries and the majority of studies utilize PROMs via a proxy. The use of PROM for patients with dementia, particularly in the context of dementia registries, requires further exploration and consideration.

scholarly journals Quality of Life After Orthognathic Surgery in Patients with Cleft: An Overview of Available Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

2021 ◽  
pp. 105566562110671
Author(s):  
Roan L. M. Ploumen ◽  
Samuel H. Willemse ◽  
Ronald E. G. Jonkman ◽  
Jitske W. Nolte ◽  
Alfred G. Becking
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Orthognathic Surgery ◽  
Quality Criteria ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Measurement Properties ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Impact

Measuring the impact of orthognathic surgery on quality of life is of significant importance in patients with cleft deformities. Standardized tools such as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are needed to fully comprehend patients’ needs and perceptions. Therefore, the availability of reliable, valid, and comprehensive questionnaires for patients is essential. The aim of this study is to identify PROMs measuring the impact of orthognathic surgery on quality of life in patients with cleft deformities and to evaluate the identified PROMs. A systematic search of the literature was performed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines. All validated PROMs, regarding the impact of orthognathic surgery on quality of life in patients with cleft deformities, were identified and assessed according to the quality criteria proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. An electronic search yielded 577 articles. After a full-text review of 87 articles, 4 articles met the inclusion criteria, comprising 58 PROMs. Of these 58 PROMs, 1 PROM (the CLEFT-Q) has been validated to measure the impact of orthognathic surgery on patients with a facial cleft. Evaluation of methodological quality of the included articles and assessment of the measurement properties of the CLEFT-Q show that the CLEFT-Q scores relatively good for all available measurement properties, making it suitable for immediate use. The CLEFT-Q was found to be the only valid instrument so far to measure the impact of orthognathic surgery on the quality of life in patients with cleft deformities.

scholarly journals Feasibility Study Protocol: Investigating The Impact of Bleed Events On Anticoagulated Patients Diagnosed With Atrial Fibrillation Using Patient Reported Outcome Measures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hayley A Hutchings ◽  
Kirsty Lanyon ◽  
Steven Lister ◽  
Raza Alikhan ◽  
Claire Fegan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Structured Interview ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Impact

Abstract BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. Oral anticoagulation therapies (OATs) are often prescribed in conjunction with medications to restore normal heart rate rhythm which can limit the risk of an AF-related stroke and systemic thromboembolism. However, they are associated with the serious side effect of bleeding. Both clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) and major bleeding while anticoagulated are believed to have a significant impact on patient quality of life (QoL). There is currently limited research into the effect bleeding has on QoL. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of identifying and recruiting patients diagnosed with AF, who are taking OATs and have recently experienced a bleed and collecting information on their QoL.MethodsWe will recruit a minimum of 50 patients to this cross sectional, observational study. We will recruit from general practices, secondary care and through an online AF forum. We will ask participants to complete three validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs: EQ5D, AFEQT and PACT-Q), approximately four weeks following a bleed and again 3 months later. We will randomly select a subset of 10 participants (of those who agree to be interviewed) to undergo a structured interview with a member of the research team to explore the impact of bleeding on their QoL and to gain feedback on the three PROMs used. We will undertake a descriptive analysis of the PROMs and demographic data. We will analyse the qualitative interviews thematically to identify key themes. DiscussionWe aim to establish if it is possible to recruit patients and use PROMs to collect information regarding how patient QoL is affected when they experience either a CRNMB or major bleed, while taking OATs for the management of AF. We will also explore the appropriateness or otherwise of the three identified PROMs for assessing quality of life following a bleed. Trial registrationThe trial has been adopted onto the NIHR Portfolio (I.D. #47771) and registered with www.ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT04921176) retrospectively registered in June 2021.

scholarly journals Quality of Life-related “Patient-reported Outcome Measures” in Oral Submucous Fibrosis Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 331-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monal Yuwanati ◽  
Rima S Gondivkar
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Functional Impairment ◽  
Oral Submucous Fibrosis ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Submucous Fibrosis ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACT Aim The aim of this study was to explore the patients’ perspectives about the impact of oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) on life quality. Materials and methods Thirty clinically diagnosed OSF patients with a wide degree of disease severity and diverse range of sociodemographic profile were included in this study. Fourteen participants were interviewed and four focus group discussions were conducted in nonclinical settings. The audio recordings were anonymized, transcribed, and translated in English from Marathi language. Data were analyzed using an in-depth narrative thematic analysis method. Results Four main themes evolved from the interviews: (1) discomfort and functional impairment; (2) psychological wellness; (3) physical wellness, and (4) social wellness. Majority of the participants discussed about discomfort and functional impairment. Participants also reported greater impact of OSF on psychological and social wellness. Conclusion This study demonstrated the impact of OSF on different aspects of participant’s life. “Discomfort and functional impairment” was noticed to be the most recognized theme by our participants. However, OSF also has impacts on other important domains, namely psychological, social, and physical wellness. Clinical significance The patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure (PROM) reflects an integral aspect of general health and well-being and thus can be used to elucidate the impact of OSF on the quality of life (QoL) of affected individuals. These patients’ perspectives should be taken into consideration along with thorough clinical examination to decide and effectively manage the overall health care needs of the OSF patients. How to cite this article Gondivkar SM, Bhowate RR, Gadbail AR, Sarode SC, Gondivkar RS, Yuwanati M, Patil S. Quality of Life-related “Patient-reported Outcome Measures” in Oral Submucous Fibrosis Patients. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018;19(3):331-338.

scholarly journals Quality improvement in vascular access: The role of patient-reported outcome measures

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie Field ◽  
Karen Tullett ◽  
Aurangzaib Khawaja ◽  
Robert Jones ◽  
Nicholas G Inston
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Specific Patient ◽  
Patient Reported

Quality improvement initiatives should be aimed to enhance clinical outcomes, service delivery and quality of life for patients. For patients reliant on haemodialysis, vascular access is a lifeline. Survival differences relating to the type of vascular access are evident and many initiatives have focussed on increasing absolute rates of arteriovenous fistulas and/or decreasing central venous catheter use. While these have achieved some success quantitatively, the qualitative effects are less obvious. The aims of this review article are to explore the concepts of quality of care in vascular access. There is a paucity of studies into the effects of vascular access on the quality of life of dialysis patients, and where studies have been performed, generalised patient-reported outcome measures have been used. To facilitate the implementation of quality improvement programmes specifically for vascular access requires suitable tools. While existing patient-reported outcome measures may be applicable to vascular access, it is likely that these will require further evaluation, and the development of vascular access–specific patient-reported outcome measures may be required.

scholarly journals The Impact of Nail Psoriasis and Treatment on Quality of Life: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Claire R. Stewart ◽  
Leah Algu ◽  
Rakhshan Kamran ◽  
Cameron F. Leveille ◽  
Khizar Abid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Nail Psoriasis ◽  
Percent Improvement ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Nail Involvement

At least 80% of patients with psoriasis will have nail involvement during their lifetimes. Understanding quality of life (QoL) impact of this condition and associated treatments is of utmost importance. Study objectives were to review the available literature describing patient-reported QoL outcomes in nail psoriasis and relationship with disease severity and treatment. A literature search was performed for English-language articles published prior to August 1, 2020. Articles were included in the review if primary data and validated patient-reported outcome measures assessing QoL were presented, and nail involvement was specifically examined. Fifteen studies were included in the final analysis. Patients with nail psoriasis had higher Psoriasis Area Severity Index and Dermatology Life Quality Index scores than those with psoriasis without nail involvement. The largest percent improvement in QoL score was associated with adalimumab. Studies investigating topicals, intralesionals, and systemic treatments were excluded since only biologic studies utilized validated patient-reported outcome measures. This review affirms that nail psoriasis is physically and emotionally distressing, warranting prompt treatment. Increased efforts are needed to address the impact of treatment on patient QoL using validated outcome measures that assess cosmetic, physical, and social problems.

scholarly journals The suitability of patient-reported outcome measures used to assess the impact of hypoglycaemia on quality of life in people with diabetes: a systematic review using COSMIN methods

Diabetologia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jill Carlton ◽  
Joanna Leaviss ◽  
Frans Pouwer ◽  
Christel Hendrieckx ◽  
Melanie M. Broadley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Structural Validity ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Aims/hypothesis It is generally accepted that hypoglycaemia can negatively impact the quality of life (QoL) of people living with diabetes. However, the suitability of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to assess this impact is unclear. The aim of this systematic review was to identify PROMs used to assess the impact of hypoglycaemia on QoL and examine their quality and psychometric properties. Methods Systematic searches (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and The Cochrane Library databases) were undertaken to identify published articles reporting on the development or validation of hypoglycaemia-specific PROMs used to assess the impact of hypoglycaemia on QoL (or domains of QoL) in adults with diabetes. A protocol was developed and registered with PROSPERO (registration no. CRD42019125153). Studies were assessed for inclusion at title/abstract stage by one reviewer. Full-text articles were scrutinised where considered relevant or potentially relevant or where doubt existed. Twenty per cent of articles were assessed by a second reviewer. PROMS were evaluated, according to COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines, and data were extracted independently by two reviewers against COSMIN criteria. Assessment of each PROM’s content validity included reviewer ratings (N = 16) of relevance, comprehensiveness and comprehensibility: by researchers (n = 6); clinicians (n = 6); and adults with diabetes (n = 4). Results Of the 214 PROMs used to assess the impact of hypoglycaemia on QoL (or domains of QoL), seven hypoglycaemia-specific PROMS were identified and subjected to full evaluation: the Fear of Hypoglycemia 15-item scale; the Hypoglycemia Fear Survey; the Hypoglycemia Fear Survey version II; the Hypoglycemia Fear Survey-II short-form; the Hypoglycemic Attitudes and Behavior Scale; the Hypoglycemic Confidence Scale; and the QoLHYPO questionnaire. Content validity was rated as ‘inconsistent’, with most as ‘(very) low’ quality, while structural validity was deemed ‘unsatisfactory’. Other measurement properties (e.g. reliability) varied, and evidence gaps were apparent across all PROMs. None of the identified studies addressed cross-cultural validity or measurement error. Criterion validity and responsiveness were not assessed due to the lack of a ‘gold standard’ measure of the impact of hypoglycaemia on QoL against which to compare the PROMS. Conclusions/interpretation None of the hypoglycaemia-specific PROMs identified had sufficient evidence to demonstrate satisfactory validity, reliability and responsiveness. All were limited in terms of content and structural validity, which restricts their utility for assessing the impact of hypoglycaemia on QoL in the clinic or research setting. Further research is needed to address the content validity of existing PROMs, or the development of new PROM(s), for the purpose of assessing the impact of hypoglycaemia on QoL. Prospero registration CRD42019125153 Graphical abstract

OP27 Patient-Reported Outcome Measures In Carotid Artery Revascularization

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 12-13
Author(s):  
Munira Essat ◽  
Ahmed Aber ◽  
Patrick Phillips ◽  
Edith Poku ◽  
Helen Buckley Wood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Health Measurement ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Impact

INTRODUCTION:Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide a way to measure the impact of a disease and its associated treatments on the quality of life from the patients’ perspective. The aim of this review was to identify PROMs that have been developed and/or validated in patients with carotid artery disease (CAD) undergoing revascularization, and to assess their psychometric properties and examine suitability for research and clinical use.METHODS:Eight electronic databases including MEDLINE and CINAHL were searched from inception to May 2015 and updated in the MEDLINE database to February 2017. A two-stage search approach was used to identify studies reporting the development and/or validation of relevant PROMs in patients with CAD undergoing revascularization. Supplementary citation searching and hand-searching reference lists of included studies were also undertaken. The Consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) and Oxford criteria were used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies, and the psychometric properties of the PROMs were evaluated using established assessment criteria.RESULTS:Six PROMs, reported in five studies, were identified: 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Euro-QoL-5-Dimension Scale (EQ-5D), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), Quality of life for CAD scale by Ivanova 2015 and a disease-specific PROM designed by Stolker 2010. The rigour of the psychometric assessment of the PROMs were variable with most only attempting to assess a single psychometric criterion. No study reported evidence on criterion validity and test-retest reliability. The overall psychometric evaluation of all included PROMs was rated as poor.CONCLUSIONS:This review highlighted a lack of evidence in validated PROMs used for patients undergoing carotid artery revascularization. As a result, the development and validation of a new PROM for this patient population is warranted in order to provide data which can supplement traditional clinical outcomes (stroke >30 days post-procedural, myocardial infarction and death), and capture changes in health status and quality of life in patients to help inform treatment decisions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document