Control of Field Bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) in Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum) with Foliar and Subsurface Layered Herbicides

Weed Science ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 332-335
Author(s):  
P. A. Banks ◽  
L. V. Hill ◽  
P. W. Santelmann
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Subsurface Layer ◽  
Foliar Spray ◽  
Wheat Crop ◽  
Convolvulus Arvensis ◽  
Visible Injury ◽  
Field Bindweed ◽  
Anisic Acid ◽  
Significant Yield

Field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensisL.) was controlled most effectively when glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] was applied as a foliar spray to blooming field bindweed. This control resulted in significant yield increases of winter wheat (Triticum aestivumL.). Earlier growth stage treatments were less effective. Dicamba (3,6-dichloro-o-anisic acid), used similarly, controlled field bindweed but caused injury to the following wheat crop. Preharvest treatments of glyphosate in wheat aided harvesting operations and controlled the perennial field bindweed through the summer. Several dinitroaniline herbicides applied as a subsurface layer (SSL), controlled field bindweed for more than 8 months after treatment. However, these treatments caused visible injury and affected the yield of the first crop of wheat but had little effect on a second crop. Dicamba applied SSL at lower rates resulted in excellent field bindweed control.

Field Bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) Control in Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum) With Herbicides

1991 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 411-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Heering ◽  
Thomas F. Peeper
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Grain Yield ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
Herbicide Application ◽  
Convolvulus Arvensis ◽  
Hard Red Winter Wheat ◽  
Field Bindweed ◽  
Imidazolinone Herbicides ◽  
Red Winter Wheat

Field experiments were conducted in Oklahoma to evaluate the effect of three imidazolinone herbicides and metsulfuron on established field bindweed and hard red winter wheat followcrops. Imazapyr at 280 g ai ha-1and imazethapyr at 560 g ai ha-1controlled field bindweed from 78 to 100% for 48 wk, but imazaquin at 560 g ai ha-1, metsulfuron at 17.5 g ai ha-1, and 2,4-D plus picloram at 1120 plus 280 g ae ha-1did not. Imidazolinone herbicides reduced forage and grain yield of wheat seeded 8 to 14 wk after herbicide application. Only imazapyr reduced grain yield of wheat seeded 15 mo after treatment.

Economic evaluation of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) control

Weed Science ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 288-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allen F. Wiese ◽  
Brent W. Bean ◽  
Clay D. Salisbury ◽  
Monty G. Schoenhals ◽  
Steve Amosson
Keyword(s):  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Winter Wheat ◽  
No Tillage ◽  
Convolvulus Arvensis ◽  
Tillage Systems ◽  
Control Practice ◽  
Field Bindweed

This research compared seven field bindweed control treatments to a check in a 3-yr winter wheat-sorghum-fallow rotation. Treatments included 3 wk intervals of sweep tillage combined with one or two annual applications of 2,4-D (tillage and 2,4-D). Two other treatments were the same as tillage and 2,4-D, except dicamba or a mixture of picloram and 2,4-D were applied once in October after wheat harvest. A fourth treatment was identical to tillage and 2,4-D, except imazapyr was sprayed immediately after harvest of wheat. Also, three no-tillage systems using glyphosate and 2,4-D at monthly intervals were supplemented with either dicamba, picloram and 2,4-D, or imazapyr the same as in treatments involving tillage and 2,4-D. The check was sweep tilled every 6 wk. All treatments controlled field bindweed in one rotation of two fallow periods and two crops. After control was accomplished, wheat and sorghum yields were about twice the check. Using 1995 costs and returns, profit for an owner-operator for the two fallow periods and two crops was $123 ha−1for tillage and 2,4-D, compared to $19 ha−1for the check. Tillage and 2,4-D supplemented with picloram or imazapyr were almost as profitable as tillage and 2,4-D. Because of high herbicide cost and low yields, no-tillage treatments lost money. Profits with a 33:67 owner-tenant rental agreement were $105 and $21 ha−1, respectively, for owner and tenant using tillage and 2,4-D. With no field bindweed control practice, the tenant lost $33 ha−1and the owner made $51 ha−1.

Use of Quinclorac Plus 2,4-D for Controlling Field Bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) in Fallow

1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 731-736 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen F. Enloe ◽  
Philip Westra ◽  
Scott J. Nissen ◽  
Stephen D. Miller ◽  
Phillip W. Stahlman
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Count Data ◽  
Late Summer ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Strong Correlations ◽  
Convolvulus Arvensis ◽  
Fallow Period ◽  
Field Bindweed ◽  
Better Than

Field studies were conducted in Colorado, Kansas, and Wyoming to compare the use of quinclorac plus 2,4-D with picloram plus 2,4-D, dicamba plus 2,4-D, a glyphosate plus 2,4-D premix, and 2,4-D alone for control of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) in a winter wheat (Triticum aestivum)-fallow rotation. Treatments were applied in late summer or fall each year for two, three, or four consecutive years at the beginning and end of each fallow period. Evaluations were taken 10 to 12 mo after treatment each year. Quinclorac plus 2,4-D and picloram plus 2,4-D consistently performed as well as or better than 2,4-D, dicamba plus 2,4-D, and glyphosate plus 2,4-D. Wheat yields increased when field bindweed was controlled during the fallow period. Strong correlations (r> −0.85) were obtained among visual field bindweed evaluation, biomass, and stand count data.

Response of Dwarf Wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Four Weed Species to Herbicides

Weed Science ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 521-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. P. Kataria ◽  
Vijay Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Dry Matter ◽  
Chenopodium Album ◽  
Wheat Crop ◽  
Weed Species ◽  
Convolvulus Arvensis ◽  
Matter Production ◽  
Dwarf Wheat ◽  
Hand Weeding ◽  
High Degree

Control of littleseed canarygrass (Phalaris minor Retz.), wild oat (Avena fatua L.), common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.), and field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis L.) in dwarf wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) fields was studied with five herbicides and hand weeding. Terbutryn [2-(tert-butylamino)-4-(ethylamino)-6-(methylthio)-s-triazine] and 1-benzthiazol-2-yl-1,3-dimethylurea controlled the weeds more effectively than did two hand weedings. Diuron [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea], nitrofen (2,4-dichlorophenyl p-nitrophenyl ether), and dichlormate (3,4-dichlorobenzyl methylcarbamate), proved only partially effective against weeds, and were therefore significantly inferior to two hand weedings. Spikes per meter of row length and test weight of wheat were increased significantly by 1-benzthiazol-2-yl-1,3-dimethylurea (1.5 to 2 kg/ha), terbutryn (0.5 kg/ha), and two hand weedings over the yields of the weedy check. The 1-benzthiazol-2-yl-1,3-dimethylurea showed a high degree of selectivity in the wheat crop at 2 kg/ha and increased yields to those of weed-free plots. Terbutryn was almost as effective as 1-benzthiazol-2-yl-1,3-dimethylurea, which increased the wheat yields over those of the weedy check by 19.8 and 42.4% during the 1974/75 and 1975/76 seasons, respectively. Tolerance of dwarf wheat to terbutryn at 0.75 kg/ha was variable, resulting in significant decreases in yield components and grain yield. Dry-matter yield of wheat was negatively correlated with the dry matter production of weeds.

Field Bindweed(Convolvulus arvensis)Control in Corn(Zea mays)and Sorghum(Sorghum bicolor)with Dicamba and 2,4-D

Weed Science ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 665-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. E. Schweizer ◽  
J. F. Swink ◽  
P. E. Heikes
Keyword(s):  
Zea Mays ◽  
Sorghum Bicolor ◽  
Soil Surface ◽  
Convolvulus Arvensis ◽  
Field Bindweed ◽  
Herbicide Treatments ◽  
Anisic Acid ◽  
Untreated Check ◽  
Dichlorophenoxy Acetic Acid ◽  
Fall Application

Control of field bindweed(Convolvulus arvensisL.) on irrigated land was studied by application of herbicides once in the fall and then only in the spring for the next 4 yr. Control of field bindweed 8 months after a fall application of 2.2 kg/ha of dicamba (3,6-dichloro-o-anisic acid) or 3.4 kg/ha of 2,4-D [(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid] was 90 and 83%, respectively. Spring applications of 0.28 kg/ha of dicamba, 0.56 kg of 2,4-D, or the mixture of these two herbicides suppressed the growth of field bindweed similarly each year. By the fall of the fourth year, field bindweed covered an average of 9% of the soil surface in the plots that received both fall- and spring-applied herbicide treatments, 72% in plots that received only fall-applied herbicide treatments, and 80% in the untreated plots. Yield of corn(Zea maysL. ‘Pioneer 3306’) was significantly higher in all treated plots than in the untreated check plots in 1 out of 2 yr. Yield of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor(L.) Moench ‘Pioneer 833’] was not increased significantly in any treated plots, but in 1 yr the mixture of 0.28 kg/ha of dicamba plus 0.56 kg/ha of 2,4-D reduced yield significantly when this mixture was applied twice at these same rates in the spring.

Field Bindweed Control with Dicamba and 2,4-D, and Crop Response to Chemical Residues

Weed Science ◽  
1971 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 717-721 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. E. Schweizer ◽  
J. F. Swink
Keyword(s):  
Convolvulus Arvensis ◽  
Herbicide Treatment ◽  
Combined Use ◽  
Chemical Residues ◽  
Top Soil ◽  
Field Bindweed ◽  
Anisic Acid ◽  
Irrigation Control ◽  
Dichlorophenoxy Acetic Acid ◽  
Field Beans

Under furrow irrigation, control of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensisL.) was at least 90% where 4.5 and 6.7 kg/ha of 3,6-dichloro-o-anisic acid (dicamba) had been applied 1 year before. Dicamba at 2.2 kg/ha, mixtures of dicamba and (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid (2,4-D), and 2,4-D alone were less effective. No herbicide treatment had eradicated field bindweed after 3 years, but the combined use of herbicides, tillage, and crop competition had suppressed the growth of field bindweed by 31 to 55%. Sugarbeet (Beta vulgarisL.) seedlings appeared normal where 2,4-D had been applied 8 months earlier, but over 90% of the seedlings were killed in plots treated with dicamba. Treatment with 2.2 kg/ha of 2,4-D and dicamba, singly or in combination, resulted in yields of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor(L.) Moench) significantly greater than yields from the untreated field bindweed check. The 4.5 and 6.7-kg/ha rates of dicamba still affected sugarbeets during the second year following treatment. Corn (Zea maysL.) production was not affected in the third year by any herbicide treatment. Dicamba, applied at 2.2, 4.5, and 6.7 kg/ha, persisted in the upper 15 cm of top soil for at least 12 months in amounts that were phytotoxic to field beans (Phaseolus vulgarisL.) and sugarbeets.

Field Bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) Control with Imazapyr

1990 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 771-775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monty G. Schoenhals ◽  
Allen F. Wiese ◽  
Mark L. Wood
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Convolvulus Arvensis ◽  
Plant Vigor ◽  
Field Bindweed

Sixteen applications of imazapyr and other herbicides were made to field bindweed from 1982 to 1986. Control with imazapyr was 89% or more 1 yr after treatment at 0.14 kg ai ha-1when plants were growing vigorously at application. Only 1 of 16 applications of imazapyr at 0.56 kg ha-1controlled less than 90% regardless of plant vigor. Control at 0.56 kg ha-1was usually superior to that obtained with dicamba at 1.1 and 2.2 kg ae ha-1, and 2,4-D at 1.1 kg ae ha-1, as well as combinations of picloram with either 2,4-D or dicamba. All herbicides were less effective when applied to field bindweed with poor vigor. Winter wheat planted in the fall up to 122 days after application was injured 20 to 88% by imazapyr at 0.14 kg ha-1. Sorghum planted the next spring was injured 15% or less by imazapyr at 0.14 and 0.28 kg ha-1.

Carbon balance assessment of a Belgian winter wheat crop (Triticum aestivum L.)

2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 1353-1366 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHRISTINE MOUREAUX ◽  
ALAIN DEBACQ ◽  
JULIEN HOYAUX ◽  
MARIE SULEAU ◽  
DENIS TOURNEUR ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Carbon Balance ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Wheat Crop ◽  
Balance Assessment ◽  
Winter Wheat Crop

Field Bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) Control with Various Herbicide Combinations

1992 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 949-955 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Westra ◽  
Philip Chapman ◽  
Phillip W. Stahlman ◽  
Stephen D. Miller ◽  
Peter K. Fay
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Convolvulus Arvensis ◽  
Control Field ◽  
Field Bindweed ◽  
Drought Conditions ◽  
Herbicide Mixtures ◽  
Fallow System ◽  
One Year

Dicamba, 2,4-D, picloram, and commercially available premixes of glyphosate plus 2,4-D or glyphosate plus dicamba were evaluated alone and in combination for field bindweed control in a winter wheat-fallow system in Colorado, Wyoming, Kansas, and Montana. Approximately one year after application, herbicide mixtures containing picloram at 0.14 or 0.28 kg ai ha-1provided the best control. In five of seven locations, the control provided by picloram in herbicide mixtures was greater than the control provided by glyphosate plus 2,4-D, 2,4-D, or dicamba when these products were mixed with picloram. Glyphosate plus 2,4-D or glyphosate plus dicamba premixes, or 2,4-D added to dicamba were less effective for long-term control of field bindweed than mixtures containing 0.14 kg ai ha-1or more of picloram. Under drought conditions in Kansas in 1988, picloram did not control field bindweed as well as in Colorado, Wyoming, or Montana where rainfall was normal.

Economic Evaluation of Field Bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) Control in a Winter Wheat-Fallow Rotation

Weed Science ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 622-628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allen F. Wiese ◽  
Clay D. Salisbury ◽  
Brent W. Bean ◽  
Monty G. Schoenhals ◽  
Steve Amosson
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Great Plains ◽  
Control Period ◽  
Control Program ◽  
No Tillage ◽  
Convolvulus Arvensis ◽  
Fallow Period ◽  
Field Bindweed ◽  
Untreated Check ◽  
Tillage System

Field bindweed infests millions of hectares in the Great Plains greatly reducing productivity and value of land. The standard practice for field bindweed control is sweep tillage at 3 wk intervals combined with one or two annual 2,4-D) applications during the 14 mo fallow period in a winter wheat-fallow crop rotation. This was compared to tillage and 2,4-D in conjunction with dicamba or a mixture of picloram+2,4-D applied once during the first October of the first 14 mo fallow period. Also, three no-tillage systems were included using glyphosate+2,4-D at monthly intervals. Two of the treatments were supplemented with dicamba, or picloram+2,4-D as in the sweep tillage system. All treatments controlled field bindweed in two fallow periods and two winter wheat crops, and increased winter wheat yields to about twice the control. Sweep tillage at 3 wk intervals combined with 2,4-D resulted in $36 ha−1profit for an owner-operator compared to $15 ha−1loss with no herbicide or tillage treatment. On average no-tillage lost $35 ha−1. Other treatments, although controlling field bindweed, lost from 35 to $186 ha−1. To determine if long-term benefit after control was achieved, average yields for the area were used to calculate profits using normal farming practices. Profits were 136, 78, and $-50 ha−1, respectively, for sweep tillage and 2,4-D, no-tillage, and the untreated check. In a standard 33:67 owner-tenant rental, profits to the owner for the control period were 90, −33, and $43 ha−1, respectively for tillage and 2,4-D, no-tillage, and untreated check. The tenant lost from $24 to 69 ha−1for the three systems indicating owners must modify rental agreements during a field bindweed control program.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document