scholarly journals Historical development of health technology assessment in Thailand

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (S1) ◽  
pp. 241-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yot Teerawattananon ◽  
Sripen Tantivess ◽  
Jomkwan Yothasamut ◽  
Pritaporn Kingkaew ◽  
Kakanang Chaisiri
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Health Economic ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
National Policy ◽  
Health Benefit ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Civil Society Organizations ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Health Technologies

Objectives: This study aims to review the development of health technology assessment (HTA), including the socioeconomic context, outputs, and policy utilization in the Thai setting.Methods: This study was conducted through extensive document reviews including these published in both domestic and international literature.Results: Evidence suggests that contextual elements of the health system, especially the country's economic status and health financing reforms, as well as their effects on government budgeting for medical and public health services, played an important role in the increasing needs and demands for HTA information among policy makers. In the midst of substantial economic growth during the years 1982 to 1996, several studies reported the rapid diffusion and poor distribution of health technologies, and inequitable access to high-cost technology in public and private hospitals. At the same time, economic analysis and its underpinning concept of efficiency were suggested by groups of scholars and health officials to guide national policy on the investment in health technology equipment. Related research and training programs were subsequently launched. However, none of these HTA units could be institutionalized into national bodies. From 1997 to 2005, an economic recession, followed by the introduction of a universal health coverage plan, triggered the demands for effective measures for cost containment and prioritization of health interventions. This made policy makers and researchers at the Ministry of Public Health (MOPH) pay increasing attention to economic appraisals, and several HTA programs were established in the Ministry. Despite the rising number of Thai health economic publications, a major problem at that period involved the poor quality of studies. Since 2006, economic recovery and demands from different interests to include expensive technologies in the public health benefit package have been crucial factors promoting the role of HTA in national policy decisions. Meanwhile, HTA capacity has been strengthened through the establishment of many health economic and HTA initiatives. An illustration of the work and contributions of the Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP) is provided. In this phase, HTA policy integration has been enhanced through different mechanisms and organizations.Conclusion: Over the past two decades a notable progression has been made in relation to the capacity building of HTA research and its policy utility in Thailand. Such development has been shaped by multiple factors. It is anticipated that experience gained among academics, health officials, and civil society organizations will be helpful not only in sustaining the momentum but also in improving formal HTA systems in the future.

Designing an interactive model of factors affecting the health technology assessment (HTA) in Iran

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 301-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammadkarim Bahadori ◽  
Ramin Ravangard ◽  
Mahya Tohidi Nezhad ◽  
Naeimeh Pourtaheri ◽  
Sayyed Morteza Hosseini-Shokouh
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Social Dimension ◽  
Ethical Dimension ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Interactive Model

PurposeAccording to the great importance of community health as well as the ever-increasing development of health technologies, the importance of designing an interactive model of factors affecting health technology assessment (HTA) can be highlighted. The purpose of designing and implementing the framework of health information system assessment is to ensure that the required accurate data which are necessary to measure the main health indicators are available. The purpose of this paper is to design an interactive model of factors affecting HTA.Design/methodology/approachThis is a cross-sectional, descriptive-analytic study conducted in the Iran Ministry of Health and Medical Education in the second half of 2017. A sample of 60 experts and professionals working in the field of health technologies are selected using purposive and snowball sampling methods. Two researcher-made questionnaires are used to collect the required data. The collected data are analyzed using decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) and MATLAB R2013a.FindingsThe results showed that “Legal dimension,” “safety,” “Effectiveness” and “Social dimension” were the affecting factors and net causes, and “Current application,” “Knowledge of technology,” “Ethical dimension,” “Costs” and “Organizational dimension” were the affected factors and net effects in the interactive model. Furthermore, “Legal dimension” with the coordinates C: [1.88, 1.27] and “Ethical dimension” with the coordinates C: [1.75, −75] were known as the most affecting and most affected factors in the interactive model, respectively.Originality/valueThe DEMATEL model is an appropriate tool for managers and policy makers to structure and prioritize factors influencing the HTA. Policy makers and decision makers can use this model for identifying relationships among factors and prioritize them. Because health policy makers and managers have a major role in formulating the regulations and guidelines related to the HTA, they should pay more attention to the legal considerations in their decisions and use the management tools to move the available resources toward implementing and enforcing rules and guidelines related to the HTA.

scholarly journals Health technology assessment in Finland

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (S1) ◽  
pp. 102-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjukka Mäkelä ◽  
Risto P. Roine
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Based Medicine ◽  
Special Responsibility ◽  
Made In

Since the 1990s, health policy makers in Finland have been supportive of evidence-based medicine and approaches to implement its results. The Finnish Office for Health Technology Assessment (Finohta) has grown from a small start in 1995 to a medium-sized health technology assessment (HTA) agency, with special responsibility in providing assessments to underpin national policies in screening. External evaluations enhanced the rapid growth. In the Finnish environment, decision making on health technologies is extremely decentralized, so Finohta has developed some practical tools for implementing HTA findings. The Managed Uptake of Medical Methods program links the hospital districts to agree on introduction of technologies. The Ohtanen database provides Finnish-language summaries of major assessments made in other countries.

scholarly journals Etica e Health Technology Assessment (HTA): sulle difficoltà della loro integrazione

2015 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pietro Refolo
Keyword(s):  
Health Economic ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Research Field ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Legal Consequences

L’etica è stata da sempre considerata parte integrante dei processi di Health Technology Assessment (HTA), nel senso che la valutazione delle conseguenze di tipo etico relative all’impiego di tecnologie sanitarie rappresenta uno degli obiettivi fondamentali di questo settore di ricerca, alla stregua delle valutazioni sulla sicurezza, l’efficacia, l’impatto economico, quello organizzativo, socio-culturale e legale. A queste dichiarazioni di intenti non ha però corrisposto una effettiva attuazione nella pratica: l’etica non ha infatti avuto grande spazio nell’HTA e solo raramente le analisi etiche hanno trovato posto nei report. Sulle ragioni della difficoltà di integrare l’etica nell’HTA è stata avanzata una serie di ipotesi. Il presente articolo intende argomentare sull’ipotesi, secondo cui, alla base dell’insuccesso dell’integrazione dell’etica nell’HTA, vi sia anche e soprattutto un problema di natura epistemologica. ---------- Ethics has been identified as a key element in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) since its conception, meaning that examining ethical consequences – as well the health, economic, social-cultural and legal consequences – raised by the use of health technologies is a fundamental aim of this research field. Nevertheless, HTA rarely addresses ethics and ethical analyses have been rarely integrated explicitly in HTA reports. Many hypotheses have been provided to explain this lack. The article intends to discuss the hypothesis for which ethics is rarely integrated in HTA also and above all because of epistemological reasons.

scholarly journals The Potential for Early Health Economic Modelling in Health Technology Assessment and Reimbursement DecisionMaking Comment on "Problems and Promises of Health Technologies: The Role of Early Health Economic Modeling"

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hansoo Kim ◽  
Stephen Goodall ◽  
Danny Liew
Keyword(s):  
Health Economic ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Economic Modelling ◽  
Broad Perspective ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Early Health ◽  
Health Economic Modelling

Grutters et al recently investigated the role of early health economic modelling of health technologies by undertaking a secondary analysis of health economic modelling assessments performed by their group. Our commentary offers a broad perspective on the potential utility of early health economic modelling to inform health technology assessment (HTA) and decision-making around reimbursement of new health technologies. Further we provide several examples to compliment Grutters and colleagues’ observations.

scholarly journals Imaginary Worlds: The European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) Recommendations for Health Economic Evaluations

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul C Langley
Keyword(s):  
Health Economic ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Relative Effectiveness ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Economic Evaluations ◽  
Normal Science ◽  
European Network ◽  
Health Technologies

The European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) guidelines for health economic evaluations represent a consolidated view of non-binding recommendations for assessments of the relative effectiveness of pharmaceuticals or other health technologies. EUnetHTA views itself as the scientific and technological backbone of the development of health technology assessment in the European Union and among its member states and other partners. Unfortunately, the standards for health technology assessment proposed by EUnetHTA do not meet the standards of normal science. They do not support credible claims for the clinical and comparative cost-effectiveness of pharmaceuticals. In rejecting the standards of normal science the guidelines put to one side the opportunity not only to re-assess and replicate clinical and cost-effectiveness claims but to provide meaningful feedback on claims assessment to health care decision makers. The purpose of this review is to make the case that, in failing to support standards for experimentation, EUnetHTA is advocating its partners support the creation of modeled or simulated imaginary or false worlds. While EUnetHTA is not alone in recommending the construction of imaginary worlds to support formulary decisions, there is still the opportunity to revisit these recommendations and decide whether or not to encourage a scientifically rigorous approach to health technology assessments - to abandon a commitment to intelligent design in favor of natural selection.  Conflict of Interest None   Type: Commentary  

HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN AN ARGENTINEAN PROVINCE: ADAPTING EXISTING TOOLS

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-127
Author(s):  
Maria Eugenia Brisson ◽  
Norberto Schapochnik
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Fine Tuning ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Key Informants ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Governmental Agencies ◽  
The University ◽  
Available Information

Objectives: This study reports on the development of a critical process for health technologies incorporation concerning an Argentinean Provincial Ministry of Health (MOH) in collaboration with the University of Lanús from 2008 to 2010.Methods: We describe the approach developed to adapt selected international experiences to provincial scenario. Bibliographic review, regulations examination, key informants interviews and iterative adjustments after various stages of consultation and consensus building with main local players, contribution from foreign experts, and piloting of process and instruments for ultimate fine-tuning are described. We examine final proposal in the light of new updated studies.Results: Analysis of regulations revealed that rules governing the provincial system were historically linked to administrative resolutions in relation to procurement with poor consideration to clinical, epidemiological, organizational, and health policy aspects. Key informants from hospitals, MOH, and other governmental agencies agreed on the lack of a process capable of guaranteeing a decision about health technology incorporation based on a transparent use of the best available information, ready to deal with competitive pressures. This adaptation provided a structured and explicit process (introduction, implementation, and development) as well as essential and supporting tools.Conclusions: MOH adopted the proposal for its progressive implementation while institutional evaluation capacity develops. Further studies are needed on the value placed on health technology assessment–based processes and recommendations by clinicians, managers, policy makers, and patients.

scholarly journals A PROCESS OF PRIORITIZING TOPICS FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN KAZAKHSTAN

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 147-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lyazzat Kosherbayeva ◽  
David Hailey ◽  
Kural Kurakbaev ◽  
Adlet Tabarov ◽  
Ainur Kumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Budget Impact ◽  
Clinical Effectiveness ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Department Staff ◽  
Selection Of

Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop criteria for the prioritization of topics for health technology assessment (HTA) in the healthcare system of Kazakhstan.Methods: Initial proposals for criteria were suggested through consultation with Ministry of Health (MoH) policy areas. These were refined through a workshop attended by HTA department staff, persons from medical universities and research institutes, and MoH policy makers. The workshop included discussion on methods used in international HTA practice. Opinions of participants on selection of criteria from those specified in a review of prioritization processes were used to define a list for inclusion in an instrument for routine use. A scoring system was established in later discussion.Results: Selected criteria for HTA prioritization were burden of disease, availability of alternative technology, clinical effectiveness, economic efficiency, budget impact, and ethical, legal, and/or psychosocial aspects. For each criterion, a health technology under consideration is given a score from 3 (High) to 1 (Low). The total score determines whether the technology is of high to medium priority or of low priority. Determination of priorities for assessment, using the instrument, should be carried out by an expert group appointed by the MoH. The process was applied in 2014 to a selection of topics, and three health technologies were chosen for full assessments.Conclusions: Criteria for prioritization have evolved with development of the HTA program in Kazakhstan. A method for HTA prioritization has been developed that is easy to apply, requires comparatively few resources, and is compatible with processes required by the MoH.

HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN SWEDEN

2000 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 560-575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Per Carlsson ◽  
Egon Jonsson ◽  
Lars Werkö ◽  
David Banta
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Medical Care ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Good Health ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Fundamental Principle ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
General Direction ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Administrative Units

Sweden has a welfare system that is based on the fundamental principle that all citizens are entitled to good health and medical care, regardless of where they live or what their economic circumstances are. Health and medical care are considered to be public sector responsibilities. However, there is growing interest in establishing more private alternatives to public care. An important characteristic of the Swedish healthcare system is its decentralization, with a major role for county councils. County councils are now merging into larger administrative units (region). The whole Swedish system is in the process of reform, mainly because of perceptions that it was too rigid and had insufficient patient orientation. An important factor in the reforms is that power in the system will be even more decentralized and will have greater public input. This change is seen as calling for increased central follow-up and evaluation of matters such as social, ethical, and economic aspects. Although the state has decentralized control, it still attempts to control the general direction of the system through regulation, subsidy, recommendations, and guidelines. An important actor in the system is the Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU). SBU began in 1987 with assessments of health technologies, but its success has recently led policy makers to extend its coverage to dental care. Health technology assessment is increasingly visible to policy makers, who find it useful in decision making.

scholarly journals Health technology assessment in Switzerland

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (S1) ◽  
pp. 174-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Koch ◽  
Julian Schilling ◽  
Marlène Läubli ◽  
Florian Mitscherlich ◽  
Dieter Melchart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
For Profit ◽  
The One

Objectives and Methods: To review Switzerland's mixed public and private healthcare system with regard to health technology assessment (HTA).Results: In the past, remarkable work in HTA was done. Accomplishments include the following: (i) Switzerland became an early member of the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment. (ii) HTA has its legal bases in terms of effectiveness, appropriateness, and efficiency. (iii) The federal law allows the introduction of new technologies for a limited time for evaluation. (iv) A Swiss Network for Health Technology Assessment was established. In 2004, federal HTA activities moved from the Swiss Federal Office “of Social Security” to the one for “Public Health.” The Office mainly mandates, manages, and coordinates evaluations attached to its prevention and intervention sections in the fields of AIDS, illegal drugs, and legal drugs.Conclusions: Because of the absence of a governmental institution assessing and reporting on new health technologies, private and for profit organizations became more important for the decision-making processes. In a regulated market, the implications may be crucial for the public health.

scholarly journals An Integrated Framework to Measure the Performance of Inter-Organizational Programme on Health Technology Assessment

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 3873
Author(s):  
Milena Vainieri ◽  
Francesca Ferrè ◽  
Stefania Manetti
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Performance Management ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Collaborative Governance ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Integrated Framework ◽  
Language And Culture ◽  
Health Authorities ◽  
Context Specific

Combining insights from collaborative governance, performance management, and health technology assessment (HTA) literature, this study develops an integrated framework to systematically measure and monitor the performance of HTA network programmes. This framework is validated throughout an action research carried out in the Italian HTA network programme for medical devices. We found that when building up collaborative performance management systems, some elements such as the participation in the design and the use of context specific performance assessment framework, facilitate their acceptance by managers and policy makers especially in high professionalized and sector-specific organizations because it reflects their distinctive language and culture. The hybrid framework may help health authorities and policymakers to understand the HTA network, monitor its performance, and ensure network sustainability over time.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document