OP133 Health Technology Assessment In Brazil: A 5-year Review Of Brazilian Health System (CONITEC) Activities

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 62-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberta Rabelo ◽  
Vania Canuto ◽  
Clarice Petramale ◽  
Tacila Mega
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Health System ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Public Management ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
National Committee ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Health Council ◽  
Brazilian Health System

INTRODUCTION:Since the creation of the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation in the Brazilian Health System (CONITEC), a new phase started in the public Brazilian Health System (SUS): a continuous updating of the system based on Health Technology Assessment (HTA). CONITEC was created by federal law in 2012 and is responsible for advising the Ministry of Health regarding the incorporation or disinvestment of health technologies. The whole process involves a strong interaction with society, including the composition of the committee, which has the participation of the National Health Council. The objective of this study was to describe the results of CONITEC in five years of operation.METHODS:This is a retrospective descriptive study, based on information from the database (period 2012–2016) and CONITEC's website.RESULTS:Since 2012, CONITEC assessed 541 technologies, including drugs (360), health products (71) and procedures (110); 303 assessment requests came from SUS agencies and institutions and the other 238 requests from pharmaceutical companies, medical societies, patient associations and the judiciary bodies. In this period, there were 190 public consultations, during which more than 24,000 feedback from society were received. The average time for evaluation was 146 days. The committee recommended the incorporation of 186 technologies into SUS, the disinvestment of 43 and was unfavorable to the incorporation of 88, generating a budgetary impact of approximately BRL2.5 billion (USD764 million).CONCLUSIONS:From 2012–2016, CONITEC tripled the average annual incorporation of new technologies compared to the period 2006–2011. In this process, it was necessary to assess efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of technologies, generating positive results for the expansion of access, health gains for patients and sustainability for the system. It should be considered that the use of evidence for decision making strengthens transparency in public management and the development of active processes of information, communication and social participation.

HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN IRELAND

2000 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 449-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Ahern ◽  
Nessa O'Doherty
Keyword(s):  
Health Services ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
New Technology ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Maximum Efficiency ◽  
Hospital System ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
New Public Health

Ireland's health system is primarily funded from general taxation and is publicly provided, although private health care retains a considerable role. It is a unique structure, a mixture of universal health service free at the point of consumption and a fee-based private system where individuals subscribe to private health insurance that covers some of their medical expenses. The recent history of the Irish health services saw consolidation of existing services and an expansion into new areas to adapt to changing practices and needs. There has also been a drive to extract maximum efficiency so as to maintain the volume and quality of patient services at a time of very tight financial constraints. Introduction of new health technologies continued to accelerate. New technologies tended to spread rapidly before systematic appraisal of their costs and benefits. When the state is involved in funding the public hospital system, acceptance of new technology is a matter for discussion between agencies and the Department of Health and Children. Decisions about spending annual “development funding” have generally not been based on careful assessment of proposals for new technology. In 1995, a healthcare reform put new Public Health Departments in Health Boards in a prime position in Ireland's health services organization. These departments now emphasize evidence-based medicine. While Ireland does not have a national health technology assessment (HTA) program, there are plans to form an advisory group on HTA in 1998. HTA is seen as a significant element of future health policy in Ireland.

Hard choices: Reflections from the tomb of the unknown patient

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 288-292
Author(s):  
Christopher McCabe ◽  
Jeff Round
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Health System ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Access To Healthcare ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Fixed Costs

Health Technology Assessment (HTA) has always sought to incorporate the evidence of all patients affected in the decision-making process. While health system budgets could increase to cover costs of new technologies, the relevant patients are those benefitting from access to the technology being appraised. More recently, with health system budgets effectively fixed, costs of new technologies are covered by displacing other, currently funded care. This reallocation means the patients affected by the decision include those whose healthcare is displaced. These patients are typically unidentified, however, and so HTA in this instance involves choosing between identified and unidentified patients. We argue that HTA should take account of identifiability bias in this decision-making, to avoid promoting inequitable and inefficient access to healthcare.

OP125 Increasing Capacity For Utilization Of Health Technology Assessment

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (S1) ◽  
pp. 48-48
Author(s):  
John Vianney Amanya ◽  
Joshua Wamboga
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Health System ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Systems Of Care ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Health System Strengthening ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Technology Innovations

Introduction:Increased capacity for utilization of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) is key to ensuring high-impact; affordable health technologies reach the people who need them most. It also enables an environment for research in access to lifesaving technologies and innovations. The number of people suffering from one or more chronic diseases is rapidly increasing and the existing systems of care are not adequately addressing this increase. Increased HTA visibility provides an opportunity for a formal connection of Health Technologies (HTs), building a new working relationship among patients and healthcare professionals, health system strengthening, engagement of patients /consumers and health care professionals for follow up on existing HTs, and assessing new Health Technology innovations.Methods:We reviewed existing HTA literature, and hosted a meeting of fifty participants at the first HTA meeting representing different health stakeholders including patients. The meeting explored innovative synergies that addressed best practices in health policy and technological decision making, and opportunities for integrating HTA in Uganda's Health system.Results:Induced practical skills in coordinating a number of uncoordinated health technologies to over forty participants, an HTA strategy developed to complement national HTA initiatives and to generate information and tools to facilitate the start of hospital-based HTA initiatives in hospitals countrywide and regionally, to improve quality and efficiency of current initiatives. An HTA association, “Uganda Association of Health Technology Assessment - UAHTA” was formed, and a work plan for piloting hospital based HTA was developed.Conclusions:A Health Technology Assessment (HTA) system will enable comprehensive patient-centered, integrated (as opposed to simultaneous but independent) assessment of complex health technologies. There is a need for increased capacity and partnerships towards evidence generation, and accountability measures.

The Spanish Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment and Services of the National Health System (RedETS)

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (03) ◽  
pp. 176-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Serrano-Aguilar ◽  
José Asua-Batarrita ◽  
María Teresa Molina-López ◽  
Mireia Espallargues ◽  
Joan Pons-Rafols ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Health System ◽  
National Health ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Relative Effectiveness ◽  
National Level ◽  
National Health System ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Methodological Guidelines

AbstractEarlier activities on health technology assessment (HTA) started in Spain around 1984, with the creation of a National Advisory Board on HTA, and the development of national and regional HTA organizations in the early 1990s. In 2012, the Spanish Health Ministry established the Spanish Network for Health Technology Assessment of the National Health System (RedETS); funded at national level and including all public HTA organizations at national and regional levels. RedETSis focused on the assessment of nondrug health technologies to inform the revision (approval and funding or disinvestment) of the Benefit Portfolio of the Spanish NHS. In parallel with European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA), RedETS has been setting-up and sharing common procedures and methodological guidelines to ensure effective cooperation and mutual recognition of the scientific and technical production in HTA. The output of RedETS is fifty to sixty annual reports, including the production of full HTA reports, Clinical Practice Guidelines, methodological guidance reports, relative effectiveness assessments, tools to support shared decision making between patients and healthcare professionals, and monitoring studies. The HTA assessments requested by the Regional Health Authorities are the biggest component of the annual RedETS working plan. These assessment needs are identified according to a yearly process and prioritized by a Commission composed of representatives from all Spanish regions with the aid of the PRITEC tool. The objectives of this study are to report and update the normative and organizational state of HTA in Spain; describing noteworthy advances witnessed over the past 10 years, as well as discussing existing challenges.

scholarly journals Social participation in the health technology incorporation process into Unified Health System

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 109
Author(s):  
Aline Silveira Silva ◽  
Maria Sharmila Alina de Sousa ◽  
Emília Vitória da Silva ◽  
Dayani Galato
Keyword(s):  
Health System ◽  
Social Participation ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Public Consultation ◽  
National Committee ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Unified Health System ◽  
Health Council ◽  
Public Hearings ◽  
Other Information

OBJECTIVE: To describe the current process of social participation in the incorporation of health technologies in Brazil, within the context of the Unified Health System (SUS). METHODS: A descriptive study was conducted based on the analysis of official records of the actions of the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation into Unified Health System and its website, from the beginning of its activities in January 2012 until December 2017. RESULTS: The findings indicate that, in Brazil, there are legal instruments related to social participation in health, including the health technology assessment (HTA) field. However, its implementation is relatively recent and has been carried out gradually. In addition to the legal instruments (National Health Council representative, public consultation and public hearing forecast), other information and transparency strategies have been shown to be allied to social participation in the incorporation of health technologies. However, activities such as legally provided public hearings have not yet been carried out. CONCLUSIONS: Several actions to foster social participation were developed over the analyzed period, but they need to be evaluated in order to maintain or improve them. In addition, there is a need for more qualified social participation in the various existing spaces, including those prescribed by law.

scholarly journals Future of Health Technology Assessment System in Iran: Necessity of Reinforcement in Both Scenarios of Continuation or Relief of Sanctions

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Sarrafkia ◽  
Saharnaz Nedjat ◽  
Reza Majdzadeh
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Health System ◽  
Capacity Building ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Sector ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Political Events ◽  
Future Events

Background: In Iran, health technology assessment (HTA) system dates back to nearly a decades ago (2008). Objectives: The current study aimed to define steps required to expand HTA in Iran by emphasizing possible future events related to the health sector. Methods: A preliminary list of future trends potentially influencing Iran’s HTA system was extracted through the literature review. Then, the trends were presented to 12 experts to obtain their opinions. Afterward, their influence on the future of the HTA system in Iran was investigated using in-depth interviews. The interviews were analyzed using the thematic analysis method; Initially, in three categories of capacity building, provision of HTA, and supportive mechanisms, and then according to the essential functions of a health system (i.e., control knobs). Results: Interviewees believed that strengthening the HTA system is mandatory, regardless of future political events. In the category of capacity building, adjusting training to the needs, using the capacity of graduates in conducting HTAs, training more students in the HTA profession as well as the establishment of a Ph.D. program, turning HTA into public demand, and preventing overuse of medical technologies were elaborated. In the second category (i.e., provision of HTA), the following themes were extracted: modernization and equipping of health system infrastructure based on the evidence provided by HTA, the legitimization of HTA to be used for all health technologies, preventing the introduction of unnecessary technologies and similar technologies that are currently using in Iran, and employing HTA in developing the basic benefit package. Conclusions: Due to international sanctions, Iran has a niche healthcare market. If sanctions continue, HTA would be a serious necessity to increase the resilience of the health system. In the case of sanctions relief, HTA is still necessary for the optimization of allocating resources. These steps, in both scenarios, are mostly related to the institutionalization of HTA, mostly on the legitimization of HTA and behavioral changes.

PP99 Hospital-Based Health Technology Assessment Units In Brazil: Present And Future

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (S1) ◽  
pp. 56-57
Author(s):  
Mírian Cohen ◽  
Ana Flávia Lima ◽  
Sandro Miguel ◽  
Marina Aziz ◽  
Ricardo Bertoglio Cardoso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Guideline Development ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Teaching Hospitals ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Online Questionnaire ◽  
Health Technologies

IntroductionSince 2007, 23 Núcleos de Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde or hospital-based health technology assessment (HB-HTA) units have been established in teaching hospitals across Brazil. These units aim to promote the development of health technology assessment in hospitals, assisting the decision-making process for implementing new technologies and evaluating and promoting the rational use of widespread technologies.MethodsAn online questionnaire was sent by e-mail to all HB-HTA units registered in the Brazilian Network for Evaluation of Health Technologies. Information was acquired to comprehensively assess the activity of the units.ResultsAll 23 HB-HTA units answered the questionnaire. Of these, 65 percent had a technology prioritization process. The technologies assessed included drug therapies (73%), equipment (64%), medical devices (64%), clinical protocols (46%), and emerging technologies (27%). The dimensions of health technology assessment (HTA) evaluated by these organizations were: efficacy (76%); effectiveness (67%); safety (67%); costs (52%); cost effectiveness or cost utility (52%); and budget impact (43%). The hospital departments that required more HTA studies were: cardiology (50%); infectious diseases (45%); hospital management (45%); oncology (40%); surgery (40%); and endocrinology (20%). HTA studies supported: incorporation of new technologies (81%); protocol or guideline development (57%); new indications for already approved technologies (38%); and withdrawal of obsolete technologies (29%). Half of the institutions also conducted educational or training activities. The main difficulties reported were a lack of trained professionals (78%), funding (70%), and material resources (48%).ConclusionsFor low- and middle-income countries, the process of implementing HB-HTA units remains a challenge. Even though human resources and funding are scarce, HB-HTA units continue to develop. Given their importance in the decision-making process, it is imperative that every effort is made to ensure their activities continue.

RESPONSIVENESS, LANGUAGE, AND ALIGNMENT: REFLECTIONS ON SOME CHALLENGES FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 223-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Dillon
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Health System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
New Technology ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
The Face ◽  
The Right

Health systems around the world cope with the challenge of difficult economic times, and the value of health technology assessment (HTA) is increasing. Making the right choices, with limited resources, in the face of increasingly complex technologies requires decisions informed by data and analyses that help us to manage the risks involved. Those who undertake and use HTA can play a greater role in helping decision makers meet these challenges; they need to think how to define innovation and respond to it, how to communicate their analyses, and, critically, how to align their work with the ambitions of their health systems. HTA can become a key health system enabler without compromising its objectivity or independence. It can say that it is too early to determine the value of a new technology when the data simply will not support a safe decision. However, it can also be bold and recommend the managed introduction of new technologies, even when the when the data is immature, provided that the health system understands the risks and there is a plausible case for believing that further research will support the value proposition. The goal for HTA is to be able confidently to do both.

scholarly journals IMPLEMENTATION OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT WORK IN A HOSPITAL IN KAZAKHSTAN

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 78-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lyazzat Kosherbayeva ◽  
David Hailey ◽  
Kural Kurakbaev ◽  
Aleksey Tsoy ◽  
Ormanbek Zhuzzhanov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Clinical Effectiveness ◽  
Hospital Staff ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
City Hospital ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Additional Funding

Objectives: The aim of this study was to implement health technology assessment (HA) in the First General City Hospital in Astana, Kazakhstan.Methods: We organized trainings to familiarize hospital staff with the purpose and details of HTA. An HTA committee was established, with representation from hospital physicians and managers, and criteria for prioritization of health technologies determined. Clinical departments of the hospital were asked to prepare applications for new technologies for their services.Results: The HTA committee reviewed five applications and selected a technology from one of these, on single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), for assessment. A short HTA report on SILS was prepared, covering its safety, clinical effectiveness, and cost effectiveness. The report was used to support a request to the Department of Health for additional funding to implement this technology within the hospital. This funding was approved and SILS was established in several hospital departments.Conclusions: This successful initial experience with HTA has paved the way for its routine use by the hospital for informing decisions on the procurement and use of new health technologies.

PP277 Analysis Of The Current Situation Of Using Hospital-Based Health Technology Assessment In Kazakhstan

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (S1) ◽  
pp. 24-24
Author(s):  
Andrey Avdeyev ◽  
Aigul Kaptagayeva ◽  
Valeriy Benberin ◽  
Nasrulla Shanazarov ◽  
Larissa Makalkina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Current Situation ◽  
Final Decision ◽  
Managerial Decision ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Stage Of Development

IntroductionHospital-based health technology assessment (HB-HTA) in Kazakhstan is currently at the initial stage of development. The Medical Center Hospital of the President's Affairs Administration, Nur-Sultan is one of the first examples of implementing and using an HB-HTA system in practice, having included in its structure an HB-HTA unit in 2015.MethodsIn order to evaluate the current situation of using the principles of HB-HTA in Kazakhstan hospitals, a special questionnaire was developed. The questionnaire was sent in the form of an official request on behalf of the Ministry of Health Care. An official response was received from twenty-nine hospitals, of which nine were at the federal level, thirteen at the regional level, and seven at the city level.ResultsOf the twenty-nine hospitals that participated in the survey, only half (52%) indicated that they were aware of the principles of using the HB-HTA system and of the structure and functions of mini-health technology assessment reports (55%). Nonetheless, most hospitals (90%) noted that the results of HB-HTA may affect the final decision on implementing new technologies in practice, and that using the systematic approach of technology assessment is necessary.ConclusionsIn assessing the clinical and economic effectiveness of new health technologies in hospitals, and the viability of implementing them, there is a lack of standardized processes in managerial decision making. The assessment of clinical effectiveness and safety when implementing technologies is carried out mainly by technology applicants or by the main specialists who are responsible for the profile of evaluating technology. This can be regarded as a conflict of interest, since the applicant's wish to introduce the new technology may bias the evaluation process.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document