PP106 Regional Guidance On Aids For Ostomy

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 121-121
Author(s):  
Anna Redomi ◽  
Marika Torbol ◽  
Anna Cavazzana ◽  
Rita Mottola ◽  
Margherita Andretta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Management ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Medical Devices ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
International Studies ◽  
Regional Health ◽  
Distribution Features

INTRODUCTION:The Veneto Region established a Technical Panel for Continence (TPC) with the purpose of producing guidance for aids based on a Health Technology Assessment (HTA) approach. TPC is a multidisciplinary experts group that involves local clinicians, pharmacists, health economist and patients associations. Among its tasks, TPC can issue recommendations in the field of appropriate use, purchasing and distribution for aids. Currently the TPC is investigating aids for ostomy patients in order to provide the first regional guidance on appropriateness and disease management for ostomy.METHODS:The Regional Health Technology Assessment Unit (CRUF) conducted a literature review of the evidence on aids for ostomy. Grey literature, and National and Regional laws and regulations were also included in the analysis. TPC discussed the collected evidence by consensus. Final recommendations have been sent to the Regional Technical Committee on Medical Devices (CTRDM) for eventual remarks, before final approval.RESULTS:The literature review did not retrieve any relevant international studies on the topic, except for the Canadian clinical guidelines on ostomy. The upcoming regional guidance will suggest recommendations on: (i) appropriate patient disease management based on a multidisciplinary team evaluation; (ii) characteristics and selection criteria for ostomy aids and related accessories; (iii) prescribing medical specialists, authorization and distribution features; and (iv) specific indicators for appropriateness monitoring.CONCLUSIONS:The regional guidance on aids and accessories for ostomy aim at ensuring the appropriateness throughout the Regional Health Service. The strict monitoring of agreed indicators is essential for appropriateness compliance and consequently the sustainability of regional medical devices expenditure.

PP128 Regional Guidance On Spinal Cord Stimulation For Chronic Pain

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 132-132
Author(s):  
Anna Cavazzana ◽  
Anna Redomi ◽  
Elena Poerio ◽  
Francesca Bassotto ◽  
Rita Mottola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Medical Devices ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
Test Procedure ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Appropriate Use ◽  
Regional Health

INTRODUCTION:Chronic Pain (CP) is the uncontrolled pain that affects patients for a long time. CP can be caused by many conditions, sometimes still poorly understood, and its levels can vary from moderate to intense. The management of resistant CP requires a stepwise approach and spinal cord stimulation (SCS) could be considered an extreme strategy. With the aim of ensuring the economic sustainability, the Veneto Region usually establishes rigorous access criteria to high-cost medical devices through its Regional Technical Committee on Medical Devices (CTRDM) and a Health Technology Assessment (HTA) procedure.METHODS:The Regional Health Technology Assessment Unit (CRUF) conducted through Pubmed a literature review of randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analysis on SCS published from March 2006 to February 2016. International and national clinical guidelines were included in the analysis as well. The regional multidisciplinary Working Group on CP, which involved local clinicians, pharmacists, clinical engineer and health economist, discussed the collected evidence by consensus. Final recommendations on the appropriate use were submitted to the CTRDM for final approval.RESULTS:The regional guidance describes the type of pain that can be treated with spinal neurostimulators and the criteria which determine the success of the test procedure. A comparative analysis of spinal neurostimulators available on the market and related patients eligibility criteria have been also included. Moreover, the guidelines stated a list of compulsory requirements in order to become a regional center authorized in performing spinal neurostimulation procedure. Finally, the document describes some indicators for appropriateness monitoring. The CTRDM approved the final version in October 2016.CONCLUSIONS:The regional guidance on SCS aims at ensuring the appropriate use of neurostimulators in patients affected by resistant CP. The strict monitoring of agreed indicators is essential for appropriateness and consequently the sustainability of medical devices expenditure throughout the Regional Health Service.

Are we measuring what matters in health technology assessment of disease management? Systematic literature review

2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lotte Steuten ◽  
Bert Vrijhoef ◽  
Hans Severens ◽  
Frits van Merode ◽  
Cor Spreeuwenberg
Keyword(s):  
Disease Management ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Substantial Part ◽  
Outcome Indicators ◽  
Process And Outcome ◽  
Process And Outcome Indicators

Objectives:An overview was produced of indicators currently used to assess disease management programs and, based on these findings, provide a framework regarding sets of indicators that should be used when taking the aims and types of disease management programs into account.Methods:A systematic literature review was performed.Results:Thirty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. It appeared that a link between aims of disease management and evaluated structure, process, as well as outcome indicators does not exist in a substantial part of published studies on disease management of diabetes and asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, especially when efficiency of care is concerned. Furthermore, structure indicators are largely missing from the evaluations, although these are of major importance for the interpretation of outcomes for purposes of decision-making. Efficiency of disease management is mainly evaluated by means ofprocessindicators; the use ofoutcomeindicators is less common. Within a framework, structure, process, and outcome indicators for effectiveness and efficiency are recommended for each type of disease management program.Conclusions:The link between aims of disease management and evaluated structure, process, and outcome indicators does not exist in a substantial part of published studies on disease management. The added value of this study mainly lies in the development of a framework to guide the choice of indicators for health technology assessment of disease management.

PP135 Setting The Scope For Assessing e-Health Technologies In Hungary

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (S1) ◽  
pp. 63-63
Author(s):  
Bence Takács ◽  
Gergő Merész
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Medical Devices ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Public Funding ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Assessment Approach

IntroductionE-health and m-health are emerging health technology fields that could possibly give a new scope to health technology assessment (HTA). The Division for Health Technology Assessment (DfHTA) is currently assessing medicines and non-drug technologies (medical devices intended for patient use or for use in hospitals). The experience assessing medical devices for use in hospitals yielded difficulties which could also arise from the critical appraisal of e-health or m-health technologies. The objective of this study was to explore the foundations for HTA guidance on e-health or m-health technologies.MethodsA targeted literature review was conducted to map the current status of technology assessment practices for e-health and m-health technologies and to assess its concordance with current reimbursement processes in countries belonging to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Experiences from past evaluations of other medical devices that could not be evaluated under the current guidance guided the literature search. The findings of this research were used to create a recommendation to amend the current Hungarian Guideline for Health Economic Analyses.ResultsThe resulting articles of the targeted literature review provided an insight into current practices on of assessing e-health and m-health products, particularly with respect to the domains of safety, quality, and impact. Recommendations suggested including a list of requirements for companies to submit for critical evaluations of e-health and m-health technologies, in support of a self-assessment approach.ConclusionsAs for other HTA bodies, there is an urgent need for the DfHTA to increase its capacity to assess digital health technologies for entry into the healthcare system, with a focus on the relevant clinical domains. The reimbursement process for these technologies remains a challenge for public funding bodies.

Overview of information retrieval in a hospital-based health technology assessment center in a Swedish region

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ida Stadig ◽  
Therese Svanberg
Keyword(s):  
Information Retrieval ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Full Text ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Literature Searching ◽  
Medical Library ◽  
Full Text Screening

Abstract Objectives This article aims to provide a brief review of information retrieval and hospital-based health technology assessment (HB-HTA) and describe library experiences and working methods at a regional HB-HTA center from the center's inception to the present day. Methods For this brief literature review, searches in PubMed and LISTA were conducted to identify studies reporting on HB-HTA and information retrieval. The description of the library's involvement in the HTA center and its working methods is based on the authors’ experience and internal and/or unpublished documents. Results Region Västra Götaland is the second largest healthcare region in Sweden and has had a regional HB-HTA center since 2007 (HTA-centrum). Assessments are performed by clinicians supported by HTA methodologists. The medical library at Sahlgrenska University Hospital works closely with HTA-centrum, with one HTA librarian responsible for coordinating the work. Conclusion In the literature on HB-HTA, we found limited descriptions of the role librarians and information specialists play in different units. The librarians at HTA-centrum play an important role, not only in literature searching but also in abstract and full-text screening.

PP206 Health Technology Assessment Guidance In The United Kingdom: Addressing Issues Specific To Medical Devices

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (S1) ◽  
pp. 26-26
Author(s):  
Scott Gibson ◽  
Sita Saunders ◽  
Amanda Hansson Hedblom ◽  
Maximilian Blüher ◽  
Rafael Torrejon Torres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United Kingdom ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Medical Devices ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Economic Assessment ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Training Costs ◽  
Medical Technologies ◽  
The United Kingdom

IntroductionThe United Kingdom spends approximately GBP4.2 billion (USD5.6 billion; EUR4.7 billion) each year on medical devices, but healthcare providers receive little health technology assessment (HTA) guidance on cost-effective device procurement. Our objective was to assess the availability of HTA guidance for medical technologies and to identify key challenges related to the economic assessment of these technologies.MethodsNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence technology appraisal (TA) and Medical Technologies Evaluation Programme (MTEP) appraisals published online between November 2009 and October 2020 were identified. The “case for adoption” recommendation, type of devices, and critiques of economic analyses for each MTEP appraisal were extracted and categorized.ResultsIn comparison to 415 publicly available TAs for pharmaceuticals, only 45 medical technologies have been appraised through the MTEP. MTEP-submitted technologies can be categorized into diagnostic (7), monitoring (3), prophylaxis (5), therapeutic (28), and other (2). Furthermore, 11 were implants, seven were used by patients, and 27 had provider interaction. Major points of MTEP criticism were a failure to model cost consequences, training costs, and organizational impact. There was also the barrier of transferring costs across budgeting divisions.ConclusionsIn comparison to HTA guidance for pharmaceuticals, there is a dearth of medical device guidance. Therapeutic and implantable devices appear to be disproportionately overrepresented in the MTEP process. This may be because their appraisal is most akin to pharmaceuticals, for which HTA processes are well established. To encourage more HTAs of medical devices, HTA guidance should elaborate on issues specifically related to medical devices.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document