PP135 Setting The Scope For Assessing e-Health Technologies In Hungary

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (S1) ◽  
pp. 63-63
Author(s):  
Bence Takács ◽  
Gergő Merész
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Medical Devices ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Public Funding ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Assessment Approach

IntroductionE-health and m-health are emerging health technology fields that could possibly give a new scope to health technology assessment (HTA). The Division for Health Technology Assessment (DfHTA) is currently assessing medicines and non-drug technologies (medical devices intended for patient use or for use in hospitals). The experience assessing medical devices for use in hospitals yielded difficulties which could also arise from the critical appraisal of e-health or m-health technologies. The objective of this study was to explore the foundations for HTA guidance on e-health or m-health technologies.MethodsA targeted literature review was conducted to map the current status of technology assessment practices for e-health and m-health technologies and to assess its concordance with current reimbursement processes in countries belonging to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Experiences from past evaluations of other medical devices that could not be evaluated under the current guidance guided the literature search. The findings of this research were used to create a recommendation to amend the current Hungarian Guideline for Health Economic Analyses.ResultsThe resulting articles of the targeted literature review provided an insight into current practices on of assessing e-health and m-health products, particularly with respect to the domains of safety, quality, and impact. Recommendations suggested including a list of requirements for companies to submit for critical evaluations of e-health and m-health technologies, in support of a self-assessment approach.ConclusionsAs for other HTA bodies, there is an urgent need for the DfHTA to increase its capacity to assess digital health technologies for entry into the healthcare system, with a focus on the relevant clinical domains. The reimbursement process for these technologies remains a challenge for public funding bodies.

Health Technology Assessment: Current Issues Impacting on the Regulatory and Legal Framework

2021 ◽  
pp. 158-176
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Medical Devices ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Systematic Evaluation ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Based Medicine ◽  
Significant Milestone

6This chapter reviews how new or innovative pharmaceuticals, medical devices, diagnostics, and digital health technologies are appraised for their clinical and cost effectiveness by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. It gives context on the processes and considerations in following the regulation of medical devices and medicines. It also refers to the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) as a branch of policy that aims at examining and rationally optimising the value of measures to improve healthcare and prevent ill health. The chapter defines the HTA as a systematic evaluation of the properties and effects of a health technology. It recounts the beginnings of health technology that go back to the dawn of evidence-based medicine, in which the randomised comparative experiments of naval surgeon James Lind on scurvy in the eighteenth century were a significant milestone.

scholarly journals Examination of Opinions of the Senior Health Managers Working in Private Hospitals on Health Technology Assessment

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Akif Erişen ◽  
Fatma Özlem Yılmaz
Keyword(s):  
General Education ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Structured Interview ◽  
Private Hospitals ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Assessment Approach ◽  
Health Administrators

INTRODUCTION: In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the views and opinions of the health administrators, who are working in the private hospitals in Konya province centre about health technology assessment and applications. METHODS: Qualitative research methods have been used in research, and phenomologic method is preferred. The research was conducted using face-to-face interviews with health administrators working in private hospitals serving in the centre of Konya and accepting to participate in the research. A semi-structured interview form was used as a data collection tool in the survey. RESULTS: As a result of the analysis, sub-themes were created under the headings of health technologies, health technology assessment, health technology assessment applications in Turkey, health technology assessment approach of private hospitals, establishment of health technology assessment department, health technology assessment applications of the respondents’ hospitals and future position of health technology assessment. And the findings under the created themes are interpreted. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The managers had various information about health technology assessment applications however it was limited. In this respect, it would be beneficial to provide a general education about health technology assessment in order to increase awareness and application of health technology assessment practices.

Application of a health technology assessment framework to digital health technologies that manage chronic disease: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy von Huben ◽  
Martin Howell ◽  
Joseph Carrello ◽  
Sarah Norris ◽  
Sally Wortley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Disease ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Primary Research ◽  
Health Technologies

Abstract Background As health services increasingly make investment decisions in digital health technologies (DHTs), a DHT-specific and comprehensive health technology assessment (HTA) process is crucial in assessing value-for-money. Research in DHTs is ever-increasing, but whether it covers the content required for HTA is unknown. Objectives To summarize current trends in primary research on DHTs that manage chronic disease at home, particularly the coverage of content recommended for DHT-specific and comprehensive HTA. Methods Medline, Embase, Econlit, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library (1 January 2015 to 20 March 2020) were searched for primary research studies using keywords related to DHT and HTA domains. Studies were assessed for coverage of the most frequently recommended content to be considered in a nine domain DHT-specific HTA previously developed. Results A total of 178 DHT interventions were identified, predominantly randomized controlled trials targeting cardiovascular disease/diabetes in high- to middle-income countries. A coverage assessment of the cardiovascular and diabetes DHT studies (112) revealed less than half covered DHT-specific content in all but the health problem domain. Content common to all technologies but essential for DHTs was covered by more than half the studies in all domains except for the effectiveness and ethical analysis domains. Conclusions Although DHT research is increasing, it is not covering all the content recommended for a DHT-specific and comprehensive HTA. The inability to conduct such an HTA may lead to health services making suboptimal investment decisions. Measures to increase the quality of trial design and reporting are required in DHT primary research.

INTRODUCTION OF INNOVATIVE MEDICAL DEVICES AT FRENCH UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS: AN OVERVIEW OF HOSPITAL-BASED HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT INITIATIVES

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 12-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Martelli ◽  
Mathilde Billaux ◽  
Isabelle Borget ◽  
Judith Pineau ◽  
Patrice Prognon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Medical Device ◽  
Medical Devices ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Local Health ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Management Processes

Objectives: Local health technology assessment (HTA) to determine whether new health technologies should be adopted is now a common practice in many healthcare organizations worldwide. However, little is known about hospital-based HTA activities in France. The objective of this study was to explore hospital-based HTA activities in French university hospitals and to provide a picture of organizational approaches to the assessment of new and innovative medical devices.Methods: Eighteen semi-structured interviews with hospital pharmacists were conducted from October 2012 to April 2013. Six topics were discussed in depth: (i) the nature of the institution concerned; (ii) activities relating to innovative medical devices; (iii) the technology assessment and decision-making process; (iv) the methodology for technology assessment; (v) factors likely to influence decisions and (vi) suggestions for improving the current process. The interview data were coded, collated and analyzed statistically.Results: Three major types of hospital-based HTA processes were identified: medical device committees, innovation committees, and “pharmacy & management” processes. HTA units had been set up to support medical device and innovation committees for technology assessment. Slow decision making was the main limitation to both these committee-based approaches. As an alternative, “pharmacy & management” processes emerged as a means of rapidly obtaining a formal assessment.Conclusions: This study provides an overview of hospital-based HTA initiatives in France. We hope that it will help to promote hospital-based HTA activities in France and discussions about ways to improve and harmonize practices, through the development of national guidelines and/or a French mini-HTA tool, for example.

VP18 Early Awareness And Alert System In Sweden: History And Current Status

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 154-155
Author(s):  
Irene Eriksson ◽  
Björn Wettermark ◽  
Marie Persson ◽  
Morgan Edström ◽  
Brian Godman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
National Level ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Early Assessment ◽  
Health Technologies

INTRODUCTION:Over the past decades, early awareness and alert (EAA) activities and systems have gained importance and become a key early Health Technology Assessment (HTA) tool. While a pioneer in HTA, Sweden had no national level EAA activities until recently. We describe the evolution and current status of the Swedish EAA System.METHODS:This was a historical analysis based on the knowledge and experience of the authors supplemented by a targeted review of published and grey literature, as well as documents produced by or relating to the Swedish EAA System. Key milestones and a description of the current state of the Swedish EAA System are presented.RESULTS:Initiatives to establish a system for the identification and assessment of emerging health technologies in Sweden date back to the 1980s. Since the 1990s, the Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU) supported the development of EuroScan and was one of its founding members. In the mid-2000s, an independent regional initiative, driven by the Stockholm Drug and Therapeutics Committee, resulted in the establishment of a regional horizon scanning unit. By 2009, this work had expanded to a collaboration between the four biggest regions in Sweden. The following year it was further expanded to the national level. Today, the Swedish EAA System carries out identification, filtration and prioritization of new drugs, early assessment of the prioritized drugs, and dissemination of the information. Its outputs are used to select new drugs for inclusion in the Swedish national process for managed introduction and follow-up.CONCLUSIONS:The Swedish EAA System started as a regional initiative and rapidly grew to become a national level activity. An important feature of the system today is its complete integration into the national process for managed introduction and follow-up of new drugs. The system will continue to evolve as a response both to the changing landscape of health innovations and to new policy initiatives at the regional, national and international levels.

PP138 Current Status Of Healthcare Decision Making And Future Perspective Of The Health Technology Assessment Implementation Roadmap In Turkey

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (S1) ◽  
pp. 16-17
Author(s):  
Enver Kagan Atikeler ◽  
Ahmad Nader Fasseeh ◽  
Bert Leufkens ◽  
Wim Goettsch
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Healthcare Decision ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Economic Decision Making ◽  
Healthcare Decision Making ◽  
Decision Making Processes

IntroductionTurkey's health reforms, which started in 2003, have led to increased access to health care and pharmaceuticals as well as rising public pharmaceutical expenditures. The need to improve healthcare decision making by implementing health technology assessment (HTA) has become an important priority for Turkey. This study sought to provide a tailor-made HTA implementation roadmap, drawing on insights from national stakeholders.Our study aimed to describe the current HTA environment in Turkey and to explore long-term perspectives and suggestions from a wide spectrum of Turkish stakeholders regarding the preferred status of HTA in ten years (by 2029).MethodsWe conducted an online survey using a questionnaire previously applied in other HTA research. We assessed the current evaluation of medical and economic decision-making processes and examined the need for HTA. We also ascertained stakeholder perspectives on potential developments that can be done together with policymakers, representatives of pharmaceutical companies, and patient organizations. We also included general information about the pharmaceutical market and decision making processes in Turkey.ResultsThe survey was sent to various stakeholders from different areas within the health system. Additional face-to-face interviews were conducted with a few respondents to clarify some of their answers. A total of twenty-seven Turkish stakeholders completed the survey. Of these, twenty-one (78%) participants were employed in the public sector and six (22%) were from the private sector. The majority of the participants would introduce HTA for all new health technologies being considered for public reimbursement and institute an additional review process for currently reimbursed technologies. Most of the respondents considered that only new technologies with significant budget impact should be evaluated in the next ten years.ConclusionsIt is clear that Turkey needs to implement an HTA process in the future. Our study shows stakeholder expectations, which will be helpful for creating an HTA implementation roadmap, and it is clear that different stakeholders have different views and expectations about HTA implementation in Turkey. The experiences of other countries will also be helpful during the implementation process.

The representation of public values in health technology assessment to inform funding decisions: the case of Australia's national funding bodies

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hossein Haji Ali Afzali ◽  
Jackie Street ◽  
Tracy Merlin ◽  
Jonathan Karnon
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Public Involvement ◽  
Public Funding ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
The Public ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Technol Assess Health ◽  
Public Inputs ◽  
Decision Making Processes

Abstract Over the past few years, there has been an increasing recognition of the value of public involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) to ensure the legitimacy and fairness of public funding decisions [Street J, Stafinski T, Lopes E, Menon D. Defining the role of the public in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and HTA-informed decision-making processes. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020;36:87–95]. However, important challenges remain, in particular, how to reorient HTA to reflect public priorities. In a recent international survey of thirty HTA agencies conducted by the International Network of Agencies for HTA (INAHTA), public engagement in HTA was listed as one of the “Top 10” challenges for HTA agencies [O'Rourke B, Werko SS, Merlin T, Huang LY, Schuller T. The “Top 10” challenges for health technology assessment: INAHTA viewpoint. Int J Technol Assess. 2020;36:1–4]. Historically, Australia has been at the forefront of the application of HTA for assessing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of new health technologies to inform public funding decisions. However, current HTA processes in Australia lack meaningful public inputs. Using Australia as an example, we describe this important limitation and discuss the potential impact of this gap on the health system and future directions.

PP106 Regional Guidance On Aids For Ostomy

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 121-121
Author(s):  
Anna Redomi ◽  
Marika Torbol ◽  
Anna Cavazzana ◽  
Rita Mottola ◽  
Margherita Andretta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Management ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Medical Devices ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
International Studies ◽  
Regional Health ◽  
Distribution Features

INTRODUCTION:The Veneto Region established a Technical Panel for Continence (TPC) with the purpose of producing guidance for aids based on a Health Technology Assessment (HTA) approach. TPC is a multidisciplinary experts group that involves local clinicians, pharmacists, health economist and patients associations. Among its tasks, TPC can issue recommendations in the field of appropriate use, purchasing and distribution for aids. Currently the TPC is investigating aids for ostomy patients in order to provide the first regional guidance on appropriateness and disease management for ostomy.METHODS:The Regional Health Technology Assessment Unit (CRUF) conducted a literature review of the evidence on aids for ostomy. Grey literature, and National and Regional laws and regulations were also included in the analysis. TPC discussed the collected evidence by consensus. Final recommendations have been sent to the Regional Technical Committee on Medical Devices (CTRDM) for eventual remarks, before final approval.RESULTS:The literature review did not retrieve any relevant international studies on the topic, except for the Canadian clinical guidelines on ostomy. The upcoming regional guidance will suggest recommendations on: (i) appropriate patient disease management based on a multidisciplinary team evaluation; (ii) characteristics and selection criteria for ostomy aids and related accessories; (iii) prescribing medical specialists, authorization and distribution features; and (iv) specific indicators for appropriateness monitoring.CONCLUSIONS:The regional guidance on aids and accessories for ostomy aim at ensuring the appropriateness throughout the Regional Health Service. The strict monitoring of agreed indicators is essential for appropriateness compliance and consequently the sustainability of regional medical devices expenditure.

VP83 How To Identify Technologies Eligible For Health Technology Assessment: A Bottom-Up Approach

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 187-187
Author(s):  
Susanna Maltoni ◽  
Maria Domenica Camerlingo ◽  
Antonella Negro ◽  
Luigi Palestini ◽  
Giovanni Ragazzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Medical Devices ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Local Level ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Bottom Up ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Emilia Romagna Region ◽  
User Friendly

INTRODUCTION:Governance of health technologies in Emilia-Romagna region, Italy, includes a local and a regional level. Medical devices (MDs) are requested by clinicians to hospital committees that may carry out an evaluation at local level or ask for a regional evaluation using Health Technology Assessment (HTA) methodology. Until the past year, committees weren't provided with a clear pathway to identify technologies for regional HTA evaluation. The aim of this study was to describe a bottom-up, shared approach to produce a tool with elements to be considered when judging if a technology is eligible for regional HTA or not.METHODS:To identify elements, we adopted a qualitative approach and the methodology of focus group (1,2) which consisted in starting from health professionals experience to build a shared knowledge. Two panels of stakeholders were convened, the first one comprising regional decision-makers deciding whether to reimburse and introduce a MD in Regional Health System; the second panel comprised regional clinicians that use, test and ask for MDs. Panels were asked to capture possible elements of MDs that should be considered for identifying the most promising and interesting ones for a regional HTA.RESULTS:The two panels (seventeen regional clinicians and twenty-two decision makers, respectively) had two operative meetings and worked in parallel. At the end of the second meeting, a draft of the tool with elements identified by both groups was built. Panels were asked to test the draft on few medical devices and identify possible tool's criticalities limiting transferability. Tool resulted user-friendly and complete, requiring no changes. The final version, approved by two panels convened together during the last meeting, reports thirty-two distinct items referred to five domains (that is, potential: innovativeness, clinical, economic, and organizational impact, environmental factors). Each item must be valued on a Likert scale. The tool will be applied on every MD requested by regional clinicians and before implementation it will be tested during a 6-month pilot phase beginning March 2017.CONCLUSIONS:The process was plain and feedback from stakeholders has been positive. The tool is expected to increase transparency and homogeneity in identifying technologies eligible for regional HTA.

Linking evidence from health technology assessments to policy and decision making: The Alberta Model

2007 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Z. Borowski ◽  
Jon Brehaut ◽  
David Hailey
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Newborn Screening ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Public Funding ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Inborn Errors ◽  
Fetal Fibronectin ◽  
Health Technologies

Objectives: The objective of this study was to develop and implement a decision-making process for public funding of health services that links policy areas with health technology assessment and input from interested parties.Methods: Health authorities, assessment organizations, and healthcare professionals were consulted as a follow-up to recommendations of an expert panel established by the Alberta government. The methods involved formulation of an eight-stage, collaborative process that incorporates identification through the health ministry of health technologies requiring review, assessment of the technologies using expert groups in Alberta, and consultation and formulation of advice within the ministry to inform ministerial funding decisions.Results: All components of the decision process have been put in place and have collaborated to provide advice to inform policy on provincial health services. Of nineteen technologies selected for review, five have been completed and decisions made: laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, fetal fibronectin assay for premature labor, newborn screening for cystic fibrosis, newborn screening for inborn errors of metabolism, and gastric electrical stimulation. A further six reviews are in progress, and reviews of the remaining technologies are planned for 2007.Conclusions: Bridging the evidence-to-policy gap is more likely to succeed when the policy community is actively engaged and an explicit model is used to put health technology assessment into practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document