scholarly journals WEAK-IDENTIFICATION ROBUST WILD BOOTSTRAP APPLIED TO A CONSISTENT MODEL SPECIFICATION TEST

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-55
Author(s):  
Jonathan B. Hill

We present a new robust bootstrap method for a test when there is a nuisance parameter under the alternative, and some parameters are possibly weakly or nonidentified. We focus on a Bierens (1990, Econometrica 58, 1443–1458)-type conditional moment test of omitted nonlinearity for convenience. Existing methods include the supremum p-value which promotes a conservative test that is generally not consistent, and test statistic transforms like the supremum and average for which bootstrap methods are not valid under weak identification. We propose a new wild bootstrap method for p-value computation by targeting specific identification cases. We then combine bootstrapped p-values across polar identification cases to form an asymptotically valid p-value approximation that is robust to any identification case. Our wild bootstrap procedure does not require knowledge of the covariance structure of the bootstrapped processes, whereas Andrews and Cheng’s (2012a, Econometrica 80, 2153–2211; 2013, Journal of Econometrics 173, 36–56; 2014, Econometric Theory 30, 287–333) simulation approach generally does. Our method allows for robust bootstrap critical value computation as well. Our bootstrap method (like conventional ones) does not lead to a consistent p-value approximation for test statistic functions like the supremum and average. Therefore, we smooth over the robust bootstrapped p-value as the basis for several tests which achieve the correct asymptotic level, and are consistent, for any degree of identification. They also achieve uniform size control. A simulation study reveals possibly large empirical size distortions in nonrobust tests when weak or nonidentification arises. One of our smoothed p-value tests, however, dominates all other tests by delivering accurate empirical size and comparatively high power.

1994 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.M. de Jong ◽  
H.J. Bierens

In this paper, a consistent model specification test is proposed. Some consistent model specification tests have been discussed in econometrics literature. Those tests are consistent by randomization, display a discontinuity in sample size, or have an asymptotic distribution that depends on the data-generating process and on the model, whereas our test does not have one of those disadvantages. Our test can be viewed upon as a conditional moment test as proposed by Newey but instead of a fixed number of conditional moments, an asymptotically infinite number of moment conditions is employed. The use of an asymptotically infinite number of conditional moments will make it possible to obtain a consistent test. Computation of the test statistic is particularly simple, since in finite samples our statistic is equivalent to a chi-square conditional moment test of a finite number of conditional moments.


1995 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 290-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Orme

Conditional moment tests check to see whether or not population moment equalities, implied by the null model specification, hold approximately in the sample. Asymptotically valid conditional statistics can easily be calculated from the output of a so-called outer product of the gradient (OPG) artificial regression. However, several studies have now found that this OPG variant exhibits extremely poor finite sample behavior and that significant improvements can be made by employing the efficient variant. In the light of such evidence, this paper develops new artificial regressions that can be used to calculate the efficient variant of the test statistic. These artificial regressions can also serve several other purposes, including the construction of Hausmantype tests of parameter estimator consistency.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yves G Berger

Abstract An empirical likelihood test is proposed for parameters of models defined by conditional moment restrictions, such as models with non-linear endogenous covariates, with or without heteroscedastic errors or non-separable transformation models. The number of empirical likelihood constraints is given by the size of the parameter, unlike alternative semi-parametric approaches. We show that the empirical likelihood ratio test is asymptotically pivotal, without explicit studentisation. A simulation study shows that the observed size is close to the nominal level, unlike alternative empirical likelihood approaches. It also offers a major advantages over two-stage least-squares, because the relationship between the endogenous and instrumental variables does not need to be known. An empirical likelihood model specification test is also proposed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannelore Liero

A goodness-of-fit test for testing the acceleration function in a nonparametric life time model is proposed. For this aim the limit distribution of an L2-type test statistic is derived. Furthermore, a bootstrap method is considered and the power of the test is studied.


2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cleiton G. Taufemback ◽  
Victor Troster ◽  
Muhammad Shahbaz

Abstract In this paper, we propose a robust test of monotonicity in asset returns that is valid under a general setting. We develop a test that allows for dependent data and is robust to conditional heteroskedasticity or heavy-tailed distributions of return differentials. Many postulated theories in economics and finance assume monotonic relationships between expected asset returns and certain underlying characteristics of an asset. Existing tests in literature fail to control the probability of a type 1 error or have low power under heavy-tailed distributions of return differentials. Monte Carlo simulations illustrate that our test statistic has a correct empirical size under all data-generating processes together with a similar power to other tests. Conversely, alternative tests are nonconservative under conditional heteroskedasticity or heavy-tailed distributions of return differentials. We also present an empirical application on the monotonicity of returns on various portfolios sorts that highlights the usefulness of our approach.


Biometrika ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
X Guo ◽  
C Y Tang

Summary We consider testing the covariance structure in statistical models. We focus on developing such tests when the random vectors of interest are not directly observable and have to be derived via estimated models. Additionally, the covariance specification may involve extra nuisance parameters which also need to be estimated. In a generic additive model setting, we develop and investigate test statistics based on the maximum discrepancy measure calculated from the residuals. To approximate the distributions of the test statistics under the null hypothesis, new multiplier bootstrap procedures with dedicated adjustments that incorporate the model and nuisance parameter estimation errors are proposed. Our theoretical development elucidates the impact due to the estimation errors with high-dimensional data and demonstrates the validity of our tests. Simulations and real data examples confirm our theory and demonstrate the performance of the proposed tests.


Entropy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 1294
Author(s):  
Lijuan Huo ◽  
Jin Seo Cho

This study examined the extreme learning machine (ELM) applied to the Wald test statistic for the model specification of the conditional mean, which we call the WELM testing procedure. The omnibus test statistics available in the literature weakly converge to a Gaussian stochastic process under the null that the model is correct, and this makes their application inconvenient. By contrast, the WELM testing procedure is straightforwardly applicable when detecting model misspecification. We applied the WELM testing procedure to the sequential testing procedure formed by a set of polynomial models and estimate an approximate conditional expectation. We then conducted extensive Monte Carlo experiments to evaluate the performance of the sequential WELM testing procedure and verify that it consistently estimates the most parsimonious conditional mean when the set of polynomial models contains a correctly specified model. Otherwise, it consistently rejects all the models in the set.


NeuroImage ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 1144-1156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tong Zhu ◽  
Xiaoxu Liu ◽  
Patrick R. Connelly ◽  
Jianhui Zhong

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document