EXACT ASYMPTOTICS OF SAMPLE-MEAN-RELATED RARE-EVENT PROBABILITIES

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Kuhn ◽  
Michel Mandjes ◽  
Thomas Taimre

Relying only on the classical Bahadur–Rao approximation for large deviations (LDs) of univariate sample means, we derive strong LD approximations for probabilities involving two sets of sample means. The main result concerns the exact asymptotics (asn→∞) of$$ {\open P}\left({\max_{i\in\{1,\ldots,d_x\}}\bar X_{i,n} \les \min_{i\in\{1,\ldots,d_y\}}\bar Y_{i,n}}\right),$$with the${\bar X}_{i,n}{\rm s}$(${\bar Y}_{i,n}{\rm s}$, respectively) denotingdx(dy) independent copies of sample means associated with the random variableX(Y). Assuming${\open E}X \gt {\open E}Y$, this is a rare event probability that vanishes essentially exponentially, but with an additional polynomial term. We also point out how the probability of interest can be estimated using importance sampling in a logarithmically efficient way. To demonstrate the usefulness of the result, we show how it can be applied to compare the order statistics of the sample means of the two populations. This has various applications, for instance in queuing or packing problems.

1974 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. H. Wang

Let X1, X2, …, Xn, be n (n ≥ 2) independent observations on a one-dimensional random variable X with distribution function F. Letbe the sample mean andbe the sample variance. In 1925, Fisher (2) showed that if the distribution function F is normal then and S2 are stochastically independent. This property was used to derive the student's t-distribution which has played a very important role in statistics. In 1936, Geary(3) proved that the independence of and S2 is a sufficient condition for F to be a normal distribution under the assumption that F has moments of all order. Later, Lukacs (14) proved this result assuming only the existence of the second moment of F. The assumption of the existence of moments of F was subsequently dropped in the proofs given by Kawata and Sakamoto (7) and by Zinger (27). Thus the independence of and S2 is a characterizing property of the normal distribution.


1982 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans U. Gerber

Let u(x) be a utility function, i.e., a function with u′(x)>0, u″(x)<0 for all x. If S is a risk to be insured (a random variable), the premium P = P(x) is obtained as the solution of the equationwhich is the condition that the premium is fair in terms of utility. It is clear that an affine transformation of u generates the same principle of premium calculation. To avoid this ambiguity, one can standardize the utility function in the sense thatfor an arbitrarily chosen point y. Alternatively, one can consider the risk aversionwhich is the same for all affine transformations of a utility function.Given the risk aversion r(x), the standardized utility function can be retrieved from the formulaIt is easily verified that this expression satisfies (2) and (3).The following lemma states that the greater the risk aversion the greater the premium, a result that does not surprise.


1961 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 265-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Markham Kahn

In his recent paper, “An Attempt to Determine the Optimum Amount of Stop Loss Reinsurance”, presented to the XVIth International Congress of Actuaries, Dr. Karl Borch considers the problem of minimizing the variance of the total claims borne by the ceding insurer. Adopting this variance as a measure of risk, he considers as the most efficient reinsurance scheme that one which serves to minimize this variance. If x represents the amount of total claims with distribution function F (x), he considers a reinsurance scheme as a transformation of F (x). Attacking his problem from a different point of view, we restate and prove it for a set of transformations apparently wider than that which he allows.The process of reinsurance substitutes for the amount of total claims x a transformed value Tx as the liability of the ceding insurer, and hence a reinsurance scheme may be described by the associated transformation T of the random variable x representing the amount of total claims, rather than by a transformation of its distribution as discussed by Borch. Let us define an admissible transformation as a Lebesgue-measurable transformation T such thatwhere c is a fixed number between o and m = E (x). Condition (a) implies that the insurer will never bear an amount greater than the actual total claims. In condition (b), c represents the reinsurance premium, assumed fixed, and is equal to the expected value of the difference between the total amount of claims x and the total retained amount of claims Tx borne by the insurer.


Author(s):  
P. A. P. Moran

Recent investigations by F. Yates (1) in agricultural statistics suggest a mathematical problem which may be formulated as follows. A function f(x) is known to be of bounded variation and Lebesgue integrable on the range −∞ < x < ∞, and its integral over this range is to be determined. In default of any knowledge of the position of the non-negligible values of the function the best that can be done is to calculate the infinite sumfor some suitable δ and an arbitrary origin t, where s ranges over all possible positive and negative integers including zero. S is evidently of period δ in t and ranges over all its values as t varies from 0 to δ. Previous writers (Aitken (2), p. 45, and Kendall (3)) have examined the resulting errors for fixed t. (They considered only symmetrical functions, and supposed one of the lattice points to be located at the centre.) Here we do not restrict ourselves to symmetrical functions and consider the likely departure of S(t) from J (the required integral) when t is a random variable uniformly distributed in (0, δ). It will be shown that S(t) is distributed about J as mean value, with a variance which will be evaluated as a function of δ, the scale of subdivision.


2012 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 1188-1193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samim Ghamami ◽  
Sheldon M. Ross

The Asmussen–Kroese Monte Carlo estimators of P(Sn > u) and P(SN > u) are known to work well in rare event settings, where SN is the sum of independent, identically distributed heavy-tailed random variables X1,…,XN and N is a nonnegative, integer-valued random variable independent of the Xi. In this paper we show how to improve the Asmussen–Kroese estimators of both probabilities when the Xi are nonnegative. We also apply our ideas to estimate the quantity E[(SN-u)+].


1967 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles J. Mode

SummaryIn this note a renewal density theorem in the multi-dimensional case is formulated and proved. Let f(x) be the density function of a p-dimensional random variable with positive mean vector μ and positive-definite covariance matrix Σ, let hn(x) be the n-fold convolution of f(x) with itself, and set Then for arbitrary choice of integers k1, …, kp–1 distinct or not in the set (1, 2, …, p), it is shown that under certain conditions as all elements in the vector x = (x1, …, xp) become large. In the above expression μ‵ is interpreted as a row vector and μ a column vector. An application to the theory of a class of age-dependent branching processes is also presented.


1970 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. Ahuja

Let X1, X2, …, Xn be n independent and identically distributed random variables having the positive binomial probability function1where 0 < p < 1, and T = {1, 2, …, N}. Define their sum as Y=X1 + X2 + … +Xn. The distribution of the random variable Y has been obtained by Malik [2] using the inversion formula for characteristic functions. It appears that his result needs some correction. The purpose of this note is to give an alternative derivation of the distribution of Y by applying one of the results, established by Patil [3], for the generalized power series distribution.


1997 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 731-746 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Glasserman ◽  
Yashan Wang

1980 ◽  
Vol 12 (03) ◽  
pp. 640-654
Author(s):  
Wulf Rehder

If n solid spheres K n of some volume V(K n ) are scattered randomly in the unit cube of euclidean d-space, some of them will overlap to form L n (s) molecules with exactly s atoms K n. The random variable L n(s) has a limit distribution if V(K n ) tends to zero but nV(Kn ) tends to infinity at a certain rate: it is shown that for L n(s) is asymptotically Poisson.


1971 ◽  
Vol 8 (02) ◽  
pp. 269-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. J. Padgett ◽  
C. P. Tsokos

In mathematical models of phenomena occurring in the general areas of the engineering, biological, and physical sciences, random or stochastic equations appear frequently. In this paper we shall formulate a problem in telephone traffic theory which leads to a stochastic integral equation which is a special case of the Volterra type of the form where: (i) ω∊Ω, where Ω is the supporting set of the probability measure space (Ω,B,P); (ii) x(t; ω) is the unknown random variable for t ∊ R +, where R + = [0, ∞); (iii) y(t; ω) is the stochastic free term or free random variable for t ∊ R +; (iv) k(t, τ; ω) is the stochastic kernel, defined for 0 ≦ τ ≦ t &lt; ∞; and (v) f(t, x) is a scalar function defined for t ∊ R + and x ∊ R, where R is the real line.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document