21.—On Expansive Free Interactions in Boundary Layers

1976 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
pp. 271-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. N. Brown ◽  
K. Stewartson ◽  
P. G. Williams ◽  
W. D. Collins
Keyword(s):  
Mach Number ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Dependent Parameter ◽  
Free Interaction

SynopsisWhen a Mach number dependent parameter σ ≠ 0 is accounted forin an expansive free interaction analogous to that of Stewartson [7], the solution terminates in a singularity with a finite pressure, but with a pressure gradient varying as the inverse three-fifths power of the distance from the singularity, apart from a subtle logarithmic modification.

Modeling of External Pressure Gradient Influence on the Stability of Disturbances in the Boundary Layers of Compressed Gas

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 64-75
Author(s):  
Sergey Gaponov ◽  
Natalya Terekhova
Keyword(s):  
Mach Number ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
External Pressure ◽  
Transition To Turbulence ◽  
Compressed Gas ◽  
High Mach ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Very High

This work continues the research on modeling of passive methods of management of flow regimes in the boundary layers of compressed gas. Authors consider the influence of pressure gradient on the evolution of perturbations of different nature. For low Mach number M = 2 increase in pressure contributes to an earlier transition of laminar to turbulent flow, and, on the contrary, drop in the pressure leads to a prolongation of the transition to turbulence. For high Mach number M = 5.35 found that the acoustic disturbances exhibit a very high dependence on the sign and magnitude of the external gradient, with a favorable gradient of the critical Reynolds number becomes smaller than the vortex disturbances, and at worst – boundary layer is destabilized directly on the leading edge

The Influence of Attached Boundary Layers in Determining the Optimum Loading for Blades in Cascade

1965 ◽  
Vol 69 (650) ◽  
pp. 133-135
Author(s):  
B. S. Stratford
Keyword(s):  
Mach Number ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
Present Note ◽  
Maximum Efficiency ◽  
Critical Mach Number ◽  
Maximum Loading ◽  
Very High

In the design of cascade blading for compressors and turbines it is often assumed that the maximum efficiency will be attained at the maximum loading that just avoids separation and critical Mach number effects. In a turbine, the overall pressure gradient is favourable so that it should be possible to achieve very high loadings and yet avoid separation. The question then arises as to whether or not such high loadings would produce a high efficiency. The present note suggests that in fact there is an optimum loading, beyond which there would be no improvement in efficiency even though separation and critical Mach number effects were avoided.

Direct total skin-friction measurement of a flat plate in zero-pressure-gradient boundary layers

2009 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 021406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiyoto Mori ◽  
Hiroki Imanishi ◽  
Yoshiyuki Tsuji ◽  
Tomohiro Hattori ◽  
Masaharu Matsubara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Flat Plate ◽  
Skin Friction ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Friction Measurement

scholarly journals Skin Friction and the Inner Flow in Pressure Gradient Turbulent Boundary Layers

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Newhall ◽  
Brian Brzek ◽  
Raul Bayoan Cal ◽  
Gunnar Johansson ◽  
Luciano Castillo
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Skin Friction ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers

scholarly journals Sound propagation in a lined nozzle with shear and bias flows

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-48
Author(s):  
LMBC Campos ◽  
C Legendre
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Mach Number ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Lower Boundary ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Core Flow ◽  
The Core ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Bias Flow ◽  
Number Formula

In this study, the propagation of waves in a two-dimensional parallel-sided nozzle is considered allowing for the combination of: (a) distinct impedances of the upper and lower walls; (b) upper and lower boundary layers with different thicknesses with linear shear velocity profiles matched to a uniform core flow; and (c) a uniform cross-flow as a bias flow out of one and into the other porous acoustic liner. The model involves an “acoustic triple deck” consisting of third-order non-sinusoidal non-plane acoustic-shear waves in the upper and lower boundary layers coupled to convected plane sinusoidal acoustic waves in the uniform core flow. The acoustic modes are determined from a dispersion relation corresponding to the vanishing of an 8 × 8 matrix determinant, and the waveforms are combinations of two acoustic and two sets of three acoustic-shear waves. The eigenvalues are calculated and the waveforms are plotted for a wide range of values of the four parameters of the problem, namely: (i/ii) the core and bias flow Mach numbers; (iii) the impedances at the two walls; and (iv) the thicknesses of the two boundary layers relative to each other and the core flow. It is shown that all three main physical phenomena considered in this model can have a significant effect on the wave field: (c) a bias or cross-flow even with small Mach number [Formula: see text] relative to the mean flow Mach number [Formula: see text] can modify the waveforms; (b) the possibly dissimilar impedances of the lined walls can absorb (or amplify) waves more or less depending on the reactance and inductance; (a) the exchange of the wave energy with the shear flow is also important, since for the same stream velocity, a thin boundary layer has higher vorticity, and lower vorticity corresponds to a thicker boundary layer. The combination of all these three effects (a–c) leads to a large set of different waveforms in the duct that are plotted for a wide range of the parameters (i–iv) of the problem.

Measurements in adverse-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers with a step change in surface roughness

1975 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 573-593 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. H. Schofield
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Step Change ◽  
Internal Layer ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Law Of The Wall

The response of turbulent boundary layers to sudden changes in surface roughness under adverse-pressure-gradient conditions has been studied experimentally. The roughness used was in the ‘d’ type array of Perry, Schofield & Joubert (1969). Two cases of a rough-to-smooth change in surface roughness were considered in the same arbitrary adverse pressure gradient. The two cases differed in the distance of the surface discontinuity from the leading edge and gave two sets of flow conditions for the establishment and growth of the internal layer which develops downstream from a change in surface roughness. These conditions were in turn different from those in the zero-pressure-gradient experiments of Antonia & Luxton. The results suggest that the growth of the new internal layer depends solely on the new conditions at the wall and scales with the local roughness length of that wall. Mean velocity profiles in the region after the step change in roughness were accurately described by Coles’ law of the wall-law of the wake combination, which contrasts with the zero-pressure-gradient results of Antonia & Luxton. The skin-friction coefficient after the step change in roughness did not overshoot the equilibrium distribution but made a slow adjustment downstream of the step. Comparisons of mean profiles indicate that similar defect profile shapes are produced in layers with arbitrary adverse pressure gradients at positions where the values of Clauser's equilibrium parameter β (= δ*τ−10dp/dx) are similar, provided that the pressure-gradient history and local values of the pressure gradient are also similar.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document