Paths, Stars and the Number Three

1996 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 277-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce Reed
Keyword(s):  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Disjoint Paths ◽  
Cubic Graph ◽  
Vertex Disjoint

A dominating set for a graph G is a set D of vertices of G such that every vertex of G not in D is adjacent to a vertex of D. We prove that any graph G of minimum degree at least three contains a dominating set D of size at most 3|V(G)|/8. A star S is a graph consisting of a centre x and a set of edges from x to S — x. Clearly, a dominating set D for a graph G corresponds to a set of |D| stars which cover V(G). Thus, we show that the vertices of any graph G of minimum degree 3 can be covered by at most 3|V(G)|/8 vertex disjoint stars. We also show that any connected cubic graph G can be covered by [|V(G)|/9] vertex disjoint paths. Both these results are sharp.

scholarly journals Locating-Dominating Sets and Identifying Codes in Graphs of Girth at least 5

10.37236/4562 ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Camino Balbuena ◽  
Florent Foucaud ◽  
Adriana Hansberg
Keyword(s):  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Upper Bounds ◽  
Disjoint Paths ◽  
Minimum Size ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Identifying Codes ◽  
Identifying Code ◽  
Codes In Graphs ◽  
Vertex Disjoint

Locating-dominating sets and identifying codes are two closely related notions in the area of separating systems. Roughly speaking, they consist in a dominating set of a graph such that every vertex is uniquely identified by its neighbourhood within the dominating set. In this paper, we study the size of a smallest locating-dominating set or identifying code for graphs of girth at least 5 and of given minimum degree. We use the technique of vertex-disjoint paths to provide upper bounds on the minimum size of such sets, and construct graphs who come close to meeting these bounds.

FAULT-TOLERANT MAXIMAL LOCAL-CONNECTIVITY ON CAYLEY GRAPHS GENERATED BY TRANSPOSITION TREES

2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (03) ◽  
pp. 253-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
LUN-MIN SHIH ◽  
CHIEH-FENG CHIANG ◽  
LIH-HSING HSU ◽  
JIMMY J. M. TAN
Keyword(s):  
Cayley Graph ◽  
Fault Tolerant ◽  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Cayley Graphs ◽  
Disjoint Paths ◽  
Local Connectivity ◽  
Vertex Disjoint

The local connectivity of two vertices is defined as the maximum number of internally vertex-disjoint paths between them. In this paper, we define two vertices as maximally local-connected, if the maximum number of internally vertex-disjoint paths between them equals the minimum degree of these two vertices. Moreover, we show that an (n-1)-regular Cayley graph generated by transposition tree is maximally local-connected, even if there are at most (n-3) faulty vertices in it, and prove that it is also (n-1)-fault-tolerant one-to-many maximally local-connected.

scholarly journals On the star forest polytope for trees and cycles

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 1763-1773
Author(s):  
Meziane Aider ◽  
Lamia Aoudia ◽  
Mourad Baïou ◽  
A. Ridha Mahjoub ◽  
Viet Hung Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Undirected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Discrete Math ◽  
Complete Characterization ◽  
Facial Structure ◽  
Maximum Weight ◽  
Single Node ◽  
End Node ◽  
Vertex Disjoint

Let G = (V, E) be an undirected graph where the edges in E have non-negative weights. A star in G is either a single node of G or a subgraph of G where all the edges share one common end-node. A star forest is a collection of vertex-disjoint stars in G. The weight of a star forest is the sum of the weights of its edges. This paper deals with the problem of finding a Maximum Weight Spanning Star Forest (MWSFP) in G. This problem is NP-hard but can be solved in polynomial time when G is a cactus [Nguyen, Discrete Math. Algorithms App. 7 (2015) 1550018]. In this paper, we present a polyhedral investigation of the MWSFP. More precisely, we study the facial structure of the star forest polytope, denoted by SFP(G), which is the convex hull of the incidence vectors of the star forests of G. First, we prove several basic properties of SFP(G) and propose an integer programming formulation for MWSFP. Then, we give a class of facet-defining inequalities, called M-tree inequalities, for SFP(G). We show that for the case when G is a tree, the M-tree and the nonnegativity inequalities give a complete characterization of SFP(G). Finally, based on the description of the dominating set polytope on cycles given by Bouchakour et al. [Eur. J. Combin. 29 (2008) 652–661], we give a complete linear description of SFP(G) when G is a cycle.

scholarly journals Cycle partitions of regular graphs

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Vytautas Gruslys ◽  
Shoham Letzter
Keyword(s):  
Regular Graph ◽  
Bipartite Graphs ◽  
Disjoint Paths ◽  
Regular Graphs ◽  
Simple Construction ◽  
Vertex Set ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Vertex Disjoint

Abstract Magnant and Martin conjectured that the vertex set of any d-regular graph G on n vertices can be partitioned into $n / (d+1)$ paths (there exists a simple construction showing that this bound would be best possible). We prove this conjecture when $d = \Omega(n)$ , improving a result of Han, who showed that in this range almost all vertices of G can be covered by $n / (d+1) + 1$ vertex-disjoint paths. In fact our proof gives a partition of V(G) into cycles. We also show that, if $d = \Omega(n)$ and G is bipartite, then V(G) can be partitioned into n/(2d) paths (this bound is tight for bipartite graphs).

scholarly journals On Directed Versions of the Hajnal–Szemerédi Theorem

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 873-928 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANDREW TREGLOWN
Keyword(s):  
Directed Graph ◽  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Directed Graphs ◽  
Perfect Matchings ◽  
Large Order ◽  
Vertex Disjoint ◽  
Removal Lemma

We say that a (di)graph G has a perfect H-packing if there exists a set of vertex-disjoint copies of H which cover all the vertices in G. The seminal Hajnal–Szemerédi theorem characterizes the minimum degree that ensures a graph G contains a perfect Kr-packing. In this paper we prove the following analogue for directed graphs: Suppose that T is a tournament on r vertices and G is a digraph of sufficiently large order n where r divides n. If G has minimum in- and outdegree at least (1−1/r)n then G contains a perfect T-packing.In the case when T is a cyclic triangle, this result verifies a recent conjecture of Czygrinow, Kierstead and Molla [4] (for large digraphs). Furthermore, in the case when T is transitive we conjecture that it suffices for every vertex in G to have sufficiently large indegree or outdegree. We prove this conjecture for transitive triangles and asymptotically for all r ⩾ 3. Our approach makes use of a result of Keevash and Mycroft [10] concerning almost perfect matchings in hypergraphs as well as the Directed Graph Removal Lemma [1, 6].

scholarly journals A New Bound on the Domination Number of Graphs with Minimum Degree Two

10.37236/499 ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Henning ◽  
Ingo Schiermeyer ◽  
Anders Yeo
Keyword(s):  
Connected Graph ◽  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Degree Condition ◽  
Cut Vertex ◽  
Delta G ◽  
Vertex Disjoint ◽  
Special Cycle

For a graph $G$, let $\gamma(G)$ denote the domination number of $G$ and let $\delta(G)$ denote the minimum degree among the vertices of $G$. A vertex $x$ is called a bad-cut-vertex of $G$ if $G-x$ contains a component, $C_x$, which is an induced $4$-cycle and $x$ is adjacent to at least one but at most three vertices on $C_x$. A cycle $C$ is called a special-cycle if $C$ is a $5$-cycle in $G$ such that if $u$ and $v$ are consecutive vertices on $C$, then at least one of $u$ and $v$ has degree $2$ in $G$. We let ${\rm bc}(G)$ denote the number of bad-cut-vertices in $G$, and ${\rm sc}(G)$ the maximum number of vertex disjoint special-cycles in $G$ that contain no bad-cut-vertices. We say that a graph is $(C_4,C_5)$-free if it has no induced $4$-cycle or $5$-cycle. Bruce Reed [Paths, stars and the number three. Combin. Probab. Comput. 5 (1996), 277–295] showed that if $G$ is a graph of order $n$ with $\delta(G) \ge 3$, then $\gamma(G) \le 3n/8$. In this paper, we relax the minimum degree condition from three to two. Let $G$ be a connected graph of order $n \ge 14$ with $\delta(G) \ge 2$. As an application of Reed's result, we show that $\gamma(G) \le \frac{1}{8} ( 3n + {\rm sc}(G) + {\rm bc}(G))$. As a consequence of this result, we have that (i) $\gamma(G) \le 2n/5$; (ii) if $G$ contains no special-cycle and no bad-cut-vertex, then $\gamma(G) \le 3n/8$; (iii) if $G$ is $(C_4,C_5)$-free, then $\gamma(G) \le 3n/8$; (iv) if $G$ is $2$-connected and $d_G(u) + d_G(v) \ge 5$ for every two adjacent vertices $u$ and $v$, then $\gamma(G) \le 3n/8$. All bounds are sharp.

scholarly journals New Bounds on the Double Total Domination Number of Graphs

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Cabrera-Martínez ◽  
F. A. Hernández-Mira
Keyword(s):  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Total Domination ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Total Domination Number ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Total Dominating Set

AbstractLet G be a graph of minimum degree at least two. A set $$D\subseteq V(G)$$ D ⊆ V ( G ) is said to be a double total dominating set of G if $$|N(v)\cap D|\ge 2$$ | N ( v ) ∩ D | ≥ 2 for every vertex $$v\in V(G)$$ v ∈ V ( G ) . The minimum cardinality among all double total dominating sets of G is the double total domination number of G. In this article, we continue with the study of this parameter. In particular, we provide new bounds on the double total domination number in terms of other domination parameters. Some of our results are tight bounds that improve some well-known results.

The Hyper-Zagreb Index and Some Properties of Graphs

2020 ◽  
pp. 120-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rao Li
Keyword(s):  
Topological Index ◽  
Sufficient Conditions ◽  
Disjoint Paths ◽  
Zagreb Index ◽  
Connected Graphs ◽  
Second Zagreb Index ◽  
Vertex Disjoint ◽  
Hamiltonian Properties

Let G = (V(G), E(G)) be a graph. The complement of G is denoted by Gc. The forgotten topological index of G, denoted F(G), is defined as the sum of the cubes of the degrees of all the vertices in G. The second Zagreb index of G, denoted M2(G), is defined as the sum of the products of the degrees of pairs of adjacent vertices in G. A graph Gisk-Hamiltonian if for all X ⊂V(G) with|X| ≤ k, the subgraph induced byV(G) - Xis Hamiltonian. Clearly, G is 0-Hamiltonian if and only if G is Hamiltonian. A graph Gisk-path-coverableifV(G) can be covered bykor fewer vertex-disjoint paths. Using F(Gc) and M2(Gc), Li obtained several sufficient conditions for Hamiltonian and traceable graphs (Rao Li, Topological Indexes and Some Hamiltonian Properties of Graphs). In this chapter, the author presents sufficient conditions based upon F(Gc) and M2(Gc)for k-Hamiltonian, k-edge-Hamiltonian, k-path-coverable, k-connected, and k-edge-connected graphs.

Pitchfork domination in graphs

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (02) ◽  
pp. 2050025
Author(s):  
Manal N. Al-Harere ◽  
Mohammed A. Abdlhusein
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Degree ◽  
Undirected Graph ◽  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
New Model ◽  
Domination In Graphs

In this paper, a new model of domination in graphs called the pitchfork domination is introduced. Let [Formula: see text] be a finite, simple and undirected graph without isolated vertices, a subset [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] is a pitchfork dominating set if every vertex [Formula: see text] dominates at least [Formula: see text] and at most [Formula: see text] vertices of [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are non-negative integers. The domination number of [Formula: see text], denotes [Formula: see text] is a minimum cardinality over all pitchfork dominating sets in [Formula: see text]. In this work, pitchfork domination when [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] is studied. Some bounds on [Formula: see text] related to the order, size, minimum degree, maximum degree of a graph and some properties are given. Pitchfork domination is determined for some known and new modified graphs. Finally, a question has been answered and discussed that; does every finite, simple and undirected graph [Formula: see text] without isolated vertices have a pitchfork domination or not?

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document