MANAGEMENT OF REDUCED FETAL MOVEMENTS

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 201-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
L E HIGGINS ◽  
E D JOHNSTONE ◽  
A E P HEAZELL

Reduced fetal movement (RFM) is commonly defined as any reduction in maternal perception of fetal activity. Perceived fetal activity may be movement of limbs, trunk or head movement, but excludes fetal hiccoughs (as this is involuntary movement). The perception of fetal movement by an expectant mother is the first, and ongoing, non-sonographic indicator of fetal viability. The “normal” pattern of fetal movements varies from pregnancy to pregnancy, and often does not become established until 28 weeks’ gestation. Many babies have particularly active periods of the day, usually corresponding to periods of maternal rest and inactivity (which may in itself reflect increased maternal awareness of fetal movement). A variable percentage of sonographically observed fetal movements are perceived by prospective mothers (commonly 30–40%, although some studies report rates as high as 80%).

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 356-362
Author(s):  
P Pallavee ◽  
Prudvi Rani Podili ◽  
Rupal Samal ◽  
Seetesh Ghose

Fetal movement counting may assist clinicians to intervene at the right time and improve perinatal outcomes, but may sometimes cause unnecessary interventions. A recent Cochrane review in 2015 concludes that there is insufficient evidence to influence practice. This prospective observational study was conducted to evaluate pregnancy outcomes of 103 pregnant women presenting with primary complaints of reduced fetal movements to our Institute. All patients underwent ultrasonography (USG) and non-stress testing (NST) as preliminary investigations and were followed up till delivery. Labor outcomes like onset of labor, mode of delivery, neonatal outcomes like APGAR scores, admission to NICU for > 24 hours, birth weight, neonatal complications and maternal complications were noted. One hundred and three pregnant women presented with reduced fetal movements, of whom, 65% were term primigravida between the ages of 18-26 years. 47.5% belonged to the high risk pregnancy group. The rates of admission (62.1%), induction (77.7%) and cesarean section (43.7%) were high in this group. Pregnancy outcomes did not differ between single and multiple episodes of reduced fetal movements. Based on risk categorization we found that a single episode of reduced fetal movement was associated with approximately 70% good neonatal outcomes, whereas there was 50% risk of adverse neonatal outcomes with multiple episodes. Though this was clinically significant we could not establish statistical significance for this result. Reduced fetal movement can occur in both low and high risk pregnant population. Pregnancy outcomes between single and multiple episodes of RFM were not significantly different.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. e34851 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynne K. Warrander ◽  
Gauri Batra ◽  
Giovanna Bernatavicius ◽  
Susan L. Greenwood ◽  
Philip Dutton ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. e39784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip J. Dutton ◽  
Lynne K. Warrander ◽  
Stephen A. Roberts ◽  
Giovanna Bernatavicius ◽  
Louise M. Byrd ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1318-1321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aya Mohr Sasson ◽  
Abraham Tsur ◽  
Anat Kalter ◽  
Alina Weissmann Brenner ◽  
Liat Gindes ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mamta Gangwal

Background: A reduced fetal movement is a common indication for assessment of fetal well being. A reduced fetal movement is considered as high risk pregnancy because the fetus is at high risk of hypoxia and sudden demise. Methods: Hospital based prospective study conducted at Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, RVRS Medical College, Bhilwara. Total 130 pregnant women were included in this study. Results: 10.77% patients didn’t perceive fetal movements after admission. Out of 14 patients with absent DFMC, 6 babies (42.86%) died and 8 babies (57.14%) survived. The association betweenNon Stress Test and mode of delivery was found statistically significant. 83.33%) were admitted in NICU. Out of 24 patients presenting with non reactive NST, 20.83% (5) babies born with APGAR score more than 7 and 79.17% (19) babies had APGAR score 4-7. Conclusion: The association between NST & DFMC and fetal outcome was found statistically significant. Keywords: DFMC, NST, Fetal outcome, survived.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-27
Author(s):  
Etwell Mari

Stillbirth affects over 2,500 families in Australia, New Zealand and over 2.64 million families worldwide annually. Stillbirths are often preceded by maternal perception of decreased fetal movement (DFM). DFM is also strongly linked to adverse perinatal outcomes such as neurodevelopmental disability, infection, fetal to maternal haemorrhage (FMH), emergency delivery, umbilical cord complications, small for gestational age (SGA) and fetal growth restriction (FGR /IUGR). Decreased fetal movements for some women may be associated with placental dysfunction, which could lead to fetal growth restriction and/or stillbirth. While evidence is still emerging in this area, some studies indicate that a reduction in stillbirth rates may be achieved by increasing maternal, clinician and community awareness about the importance of DFM. Fetal movements are an important simple maker of fetal wellbeing, while reduced fetal movements can be the early symptom of fetal compromise and failure to respond by a mother or maternity provider might lead to intrauterine fetal death (IUFD). Fetal movement counting (Fetal Kicks monitoring) is very controversial, maternal anxiety has been highlighted as a big issue in those who follow fetal kick counting advice. The value of maternal fetal movements (FM) monitoring has been assessed in a number of studies of pregnant women. There are conflicting results with most showing no overall reduction in perinatal losses even when fetal movement monitoring has been recommended. Fetuses that are experiencing sub acute and slow progressing fetal compromise can be saved if mothers detect reduced fetal activity and present to their midwife or Obstetrician.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Billie Bradford

<p>Background: Maternal perception of decreased fetal movements is a specific indicator of fetal compromise, notably in the context of poor fetal growth. There is currently no agreed numerical definition of decreased fetal movements, with subjective perception of a decrease on the part of the mother being the most significant definition clinically. Both qualitative and quantitative aspects of fetal activity may be important in identifying the compromised fetus.Yet, how pregnant women perceive and describe fetal activity is under-investigated by qualitative means. The aim of this study was to explore normal fetal activity, through first-hand descriptive accounts by pregnant women.  Methods: Using qualitative descriptive methodology, interviews were conducted with 19 low-risk women experiencing their first pregnancy, at two timepoints in their third trimester. Interview transcripts were later analysed using qualitative content analysis and patterns of fetal activity identified were then considered along-side the characteristics of the women and their birth outcomes.  Results: Fetal activity as described by pregnant women demonstrated a sustained increase in strength, frequency and variation from quickening until 28-32 weeks. Strength of movements continued to increase at term, but variation in movement types reduced. Kicking and jolting movements decreased at term with pushing or stretching movements dominating. In this study increased strength and frequency of movements at term as determined qualitatively by the mother was associated with higher mean customised birthweight of newborns, whilst decreased frequency was in all cases associated with either maternal obesity, customised birthweight under the 20th centile or operative delivery for non-reassuring fetal status.  A novel finding of a complex pattern of fetal movements in relation to mealtimes is reported here. More than a third of participants (37%) described marked increases in fetal movements in response to hunger, in many cases subsiding postprandially. The women who described this pattern in response to hunger and eating, subsequently gave birth to infants significantly smaller (mean difference 364gm) than those who did not describe a fetal response to hunger. Patterns of fetal movements were reported to be influenced by time of day, maternal position and activity, with an inverse relationship between maternal activity and fetal activity described by all participants.  Conclusions: Maternal descriptions of fetal movements with advancing gestation and in relation to time of day are consistent with fetal activity as described in ultrasound studies, lending reliability to the maternal account. Maternal perception of fetal movements in response to environmental stimuli such as maternal meals and maternal position-changes may constitute a maternal-fetal communication in the interests of maintaining the pregnancy. Pregnant women are reassured by fetal movements occurring at a usual time or situation, suggesting that maternal monitoring of fetal movements is a dynamic process taking into account a broad range of fetal functions.</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Billie Bradford

<p>Background: Maternal perception of decreased fetal movements is a specific indicator of fetal compromise, notably in the context of poor fetal growth. There is currently no agreed numerical definition of decreased fetal movements, with subjective perception of a decrease on the part of the mother being the most significant definition clinically. Both qualitative and quantitative aspects of fetal activity may be important in identifying the compromised fetus.Yet, how pregnant women perceive and describe fetal activity is under-investigated by qualitative means. The aim of this study was to explore normal fetal activity, through first-hand descriptive accounts by pregnant women.  Methods: Using qualitative descriptive methodology, interviews were conducted with 19 low-risk women experiencing their first pregnancy, at two timepoints in their third trimester. Interview transcripts were later analysed using qualitative content analysis and patterns of fetal activity identified were then considered along-side the characteristics of the women and their birth outcomes.  Results: Fetal activity as described by pregnant women demonstrated a sustained increase in strength, frequency and variation from quickening until 28-32 weeks. Strength of movements continued to increase at term, but variation in movement types reduced. Kicking and jolting movements decreased at term with pushing or stretching movements dominating. In this study increased strength and frequency of movements at term as determined qualitatively by the mother was associated with higher mean customised birthweight of newborns, whilst decreased frequency was in all cases associated with either maternal obesity, customised birthweight under the 20th centile or operative delivery for non-reassuring fetal status.  A novel finding of a complex pattern of fetal movements in relation to mealtimes is reported here. More than a third of participants (37%) described marked increases in fetal movements in response to hunger, in many cases subsiding postprandially. The women who described this pattern in response to hunger and eating, subsequently gave birth to infants significantly smaller (mean difference 364gm) than those who did not describe a fetal response to hunger. Patterns of fetal movements were reported to be influenced by time of day, maternal position and activity, with an inverse relationship between maternal activity and fetal activity described by all participants.  Conclusions: Maternal descriptions of fetal movements with advancing gestation and in relation to time of day are consistent with fetal activity as described in ultrasound studies, lending reliability to the maternal account. Maternal perception of fetal movements in response to environmental stimuli such as maternal meals and maternal position-changes may constitute a maternal-fetal communication in the interests of maintaining the pregnancy. Pregnant women are reassured by fetal movements occurring at a usual time or situation, suggesting that maternal monitoring of fetal movements is a dynamic process taking into account a broad range of fetal functions.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document