Can leisure activities slow dementia progression in nursing home residents? A cluster-randomized controlled trial

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 637-643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheung-Tak Cheng ◽  
Pizza K. Chow ◽  
You-Qiang Song ◽  
Edwin C. S. Yu ◽  
John H. M. Lam
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Tai Chi ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Multilevel Regression ◽  
Global Functioning ◽  
Gradual Improvement ◽  
Cluster Randomized ◽  
Functional Components

ABSTRACTBackground:To examine the effects of complex cognitive (mahjong) and physical (Tai Chi) activities on dementia severity in nursing home residents with dementia.Methods:Cluster-randomized open-label controlled design. 110 residents were randomized by nursing home into three conditions: mahjong, Tai Chi, and simple handicrafts (control). Activities were conducted three times a week for 12 weeks. Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) was taken at 0 (baseline), 3 (post-treatment), 6, and 9 months. The outcome measure was CDR sum-of-box, which is a composite measure of both cognitive and functional deterioration in dementia.Results:Intent-to-treat analyses were performed using multilevel regression models. Apolipoprotein E ε4 allele and education were included as covariates. Neither treatments had effects on the cognitive and functional components of the CDR, but mahjong had a significant interaction with time on the CDR sum-of-box total, suggesting a slower rate of global deterioration in the mahjong group as compared with the control group.Conclusions:Mahjong led to a gradual improvement in global functioning and a slightly slower rate of dementia progression over time. The effect was generalized and was not specific to cognition or daily functioning.

scholarly journals A tablet-based intervention for activating nursing home residents with dementia: results from a cluster-randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Julie L. O’Sullivan ◽  
Sonia Lech ◽  
Paul Gellert ◽  
Ulrike Grittner ◽  
Jan-Niklas Voigt-Antons ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Psychotropic Medication ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Cluster Randomized

Abstract Objectives: To investigate global and momentary effects of a tablet-based non-pharmacological intervention for nursing home residents living with dementia. Design: Cluster-randomized controlled trial. Setting: Ten nursing homes in Germany were randomly allocated to the tablet-based intervention (TBI, 5 units) or conventional activity sessions (CAS, 5 units). Participants: N = 162 residents with dementia. Intervention: Participants received regular TBI (n = 80) with stimulating activities developed to engage people with dementia or CAS (n = 82) for 8 weeks. Measurements: Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES-I, primary outcome), Quality of Life in Alzheimer’s Disease scale, QUALIDEM scale, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, Geriatric Depression Scale, and psychotropic medication (secondary outcomes). Momentary quality of life was assessed before and after each activity session. Participants and staff were blinded until the collection of baseline data was completed. Data were analyzed with linear mixed-effects models. Results: Levels of apathy decreased slightly in both groups (mean decrease in AES-I of .61 points, 95% CI −3.54, 2.33 for TBI and .36 points, 95% CI −3.27, 2.55 for CAS). Group difference in change of apathy was not statistically significant (β = .25; 95% CI 3.89, 4.38, p = .91). This corresponds to a standardized effect size (Cohen’s d) of .02. A reduction of psychotropic medication was found for TBI compared to CAS. Further analyses revealed a post-intervention improvement in QUALIDEM scores across both groups and short-term improvements of momentary quality of life in the CAS group. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that interventions involving tailored activities have a beneficial impact on global and momentary quality of life in nursing home residents with dementia. Although we found no clear advantage of TBI compared to CAS, tablet computers can support delivery of non-pharmacological interventions in nursing homes and facilitate regular assessments of fluctuating momentary states.

scholarly journals A randomized controlled trial of a specific reminiscence approach to promote the well-being of nursing home residents with dementia

2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia K. Y. Lai ◽  
Iris Chi ◽  
Jeanie Kayser-Jones
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Background: To date, no firm conclusions can be reached regarding the effectiveness of reminiscence for dementia. Researchers have emphasized that there is an urgent need for more systematic research in the area.Objective and Method: A single-blinded, parallel-groups (one intervention, one comparison, and one no-intervention group) randomized controlled trial (RCT) was adopted to investigate whether a specific reminiscence program leads to higher levels of psychosocial well-being in nursing home residents with dementia. The intervention adopted a life-story approach, while the comparison group provided friendly discussions to control for any changes in outcome as a result of social contacts and attention. The Social Engagement Scale (SES) and Well-being/Ill-being Scale (WIB) were the outcome measures used. The outcomes of the groups were examined with reference to the baseline (T0), immediately (T1), and six weeks (T2) after intervention. The final sample had 101 subjects (control group: n=30; comparison group: n=35; intervention group: n=36). Using multivariate analysis with repeated measures, no significant differences in outcome were found between groups at either T1 or T2. Wilcoxon signed rank tests were performed for each group comparing outcomes between T1 and T0, T2 and T1, and T2 and T0. Significant differences were observed in the intervention group when comparing T1 and T0 WIB (p=.014), but not for the other groups.Conclusion: Although the intervention did not lead to significant differences between the three groups over time, there was a significant improvement in psychosocial well-being for the intervention group.

scholarly journals Reducing Antibiotic Prescriptions for Urinary Tract Infection in Nursing Homes Using a Complex Tailored Intervention Targeting Nursing Home Staff: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sif Helene Arnold ◽  
Jette Nygaard Jensen ◽  
Marius Brostrøm Kousgaard ◽  
Volkert Siersma ◽  
Lars Bjerrum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Antibiotic Prescription ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Nursing Home Staff ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Cluster Randomized

BACKGROUND Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common reason for antibiotic prescription in nursing homes. Overprescription causes antibiotic-related harms in those who are treated and others residing within the nursing home. The diagnostic process in nursing homes is complicated with both challenging issues related to the elderly population and the nursing home setting. A physician rarely visits a nursing home for suspected UTI. Consequently, the knowledge of UTI and communication skills of staff influence the diagnosis. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to describe a cluster randomized controlled trial with a tailored complex intervention for improving the knowledge of UTI and communication skills of nursing home staff in order to decrease the number of antibiotic prescriptions for UTI in nursing home residents, without changing hospitalization and mortality. METHODS The study describes an open-label cluster randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups and a 1:1 allocation ratio. Twenty-two eligible nursing homes are sampled from the Capital Region of Denmark, corresponding to 1274 nursing home residents. The intervention group receives a dialogue tool, and all nursing home staff attend a workshop on UTI. The main outcomes of the study are the antibiotic prescription rate for UTI, all-cause hospitalization, all-cause mortality, and suspected UTI during the trial period. RESULTS The trial ended in April 2019. Data have been collected and are being analyzed. We expect the results of the trial to be published in a peer-reviewed journal in the fall of 2020. CONCLUSIONS The greatest strengths of this study are the randomized design, tailored development of the intervention, and access to medical records. The potential limitations are the hierarchy in the prescription process, Hawthorne effect, and biased access to data on signs and symptoms through a UTI diary. The results of this trial could offer a strategy to overcome some of the challenges of increased antibiotic resistance and could have implications in terms of how to handle cases of suspected UTI. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03715062; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03715062 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT DERR1-10.2196/17710

scholarly journals A three-armed cognitive-motor exercise intervention to increase spatial orientation and life-space mobility in nursing home residents: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial in the PROfit project

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bettina Wollesen ◽  
Madeleine Fricke ◽  
Carl-Philipp Jansen ◽  
Katharina Gordt ◽  
Michael Schwenk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
Spatial Orientation ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Wait List ◽  
Wait List Control Group ◽  
Wait List Control ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract Background In nursing home residents, the combination of decreasing mobility and declining cognitive abilities, including spatial orientation, often leads to reduced physical activity (PA) and life-space (LS) mobility. As a consequence of sedentary behavior, there is a lack of social interaction and cognitive stimulation, resulting in low quality of life. It has not yet been examined whether cognitive-motor training including spatial cognitive tasks is suitable to improve spatial orientation and, as a consequence, to enlarge LS mobility, and increase well-being and general cognitive-motor functioning. Therefore, the overall goal of this multicentric randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to compare the effect of three different intervention approaches including functional exercise and orientation tasks on PA, LS and spatial orientation in nursing home residents. Methods A three-arm single-blinded multicenter RCT with a wait-list control group will be conducted in a sample of 513 individuals (needed according to power analysis) in three different regions in Germany. In each nursing home, one of three different intervention approaches will be delivered to participating residents for 12 weeks, twice a week for 45 min each: The PROfit basic group will perform functional strength, balance, flexibility, and walking exercises always at the same location, whereas the PROfit plus group changes the location three times while performing similar/the same exercises as the PROfit basic group. The PROfit orientation group receives navigation tasks in addition to the relocation during the intervention. Physical and cognitive functioning as well as psychological measures will be assessed in all study groups at baseline. Participants will then be randomized into either the intervention group or the wait-list control group. After 12 weeks, and after 24 weeks the measures will be repeated. Discussion This study evaluates whether the three different interventions are feasible to reduce the decline of or even improve PA, LS, and spatial orientation in nursing home residents. By adding different training locations in PROfit plus, the program is expected to be superior to PROfit basic in increasing physical and cognitive parameters. Moreover, we expect the PROfit orientation intervention to be most effective in terms of PA, LS, and spatial orientation due to two mechanisms: (1) increased physical and cognitive activity will enhance cognitive-motor capacity and (2) the spatial training will help to build up cognitive strategies to compensate for age-related loss of spatial orientation abilities and related limitations. Trial registration The trial was prospectively registered at DRKS.de with registration number DRKS00021423 on April 16, 2020 and was granted permission by the Technical University Berlin local ethics committee (No. GR_14_20191217).

Apathy in Nursing Home Residents with Dementia: Results From A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Treusch ◽  
T. Majic ◽  
J. Page ◽  
H. Gutzmann ◽  
A. Heinz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Cluster Randomized Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Intervention Period ◽  
Significant Group ◽  
Dementia Patients ◽  
Cluster Randomized ◽  
One Year

AbstractPurpose:Here we evaluate an interdisciplinary occupational and sport therapy intervention for dementia patients suffering from apathy.Subjects and methods:A prospective, controlled, rater-blinded, clinical trial with two follow-ups was conducted as part of a larger cluster-randomized trial in 18 nursing homes in Berlin. n = 117 dementia patients with apathy, defined as a score of 40 or more on the apathy evaluation scale (AES) or presence of apathy on the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), were randomly assigned to intervention or control group. The intervention included 10 months of brief activities, provided once a week. The primary outcome measure was the total score on the AES scale measured directly after the intervention period and again after 12 months.Results:We found significant group differences with respect to apathy during the 10 month intervention period (F2,82 = 7.79, P < 0.01), which reflected an increase in apathy in the control group, but not in the intervention group. Within one year after the intervention was ceased, the treatment group worsened and no longer differed significantly from the control group (P = 0.55).Conclusions:Our intervention was effective for the therapy of apathy in dementia, when applied, but not one year after cessation of therapy.

scholarly journals Effect of Varying Repositioning Frequency on Prevention of Pressure Injuries in Nursing Home Residents: TEAM‐UP Cluster‐Randomized Clinical Trial Results

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracey L. Yap ◽  
Susan D. Horn ◽  
Phoebe D. Sharkey ◽  
Tianyu Zheng ◽  
Nancy Bergstrom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Institutional Care ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Clinical Effectiveness ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Effective Sample Size ◽  
Injury Incidence ◽  
Cluster Randomized

Abstract Background: Pressure injuries (PrIs) cause pain and infection, lengthen institutional care, raise healthcare costs, and hasten death in nursing home (NH) residents. Repositioning residents to offload pressure on tissues is the most common prevention strategy, yetthe optimal interval remains uncertain.Objective: Investigate clinical effectiveness of three nursing-home-wide repositioning intervals (2-,3-, or 4-hours) without compromising PrI incidence in four weeks in adult nursing home residents.Design, Setting, and Participants: Anembedded pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted in 9 NHs from a large proprietary system located in 34 states. Each NH was randomly assigned to one of three NH-wide repositioning interval Arms (every 2, 3, or 4 hours). Data were provided for 12-month Baseline and 4-week Intervention during the Turn Everyone And Move for Ulcer Prevention (TEAM-UP) study. Intervention residents were without current PrIs, had PrIrisk (Braden Score) ≥10 (low, mild, moderate, or high risk; not severe risk), and used viable 7” high-density foam mattresses.Methods: Each Arm included three NHs with assigned single repositioning interval as standard care during the 4-week Intervention. Mandatory staff education sessions were provided.A wireless patient monitoring system, using wearable single-use patient sensors, cued staff by displaying resident repositioning need on conveniently placed monitors.Primary outcome was PrI incidence; secondary outcome was staff repositioning compliance fidelity.Results: Eleven hundred residents from 9 NHs were fitted with sensors; 108 of these were ineligible for some analyses due to missing Baseline data. Effective sample size included 992 residents (mean age 78 years [SD13]; 63% female). Pressure injury incidence during the Intervention was 0.0% compared to 5.24% in Baseline, even though Intervention resident clinical risk scores were significantlyhigher (p<0.001). Repositioning compliance for 4-hour repositioning interval (95%) was significantly better than 2- (80%) or 3- (90%) hours (p<.001).Conclusions: This study contributes to understanding alternativerepositioning intervalssuggestingcurrent 2-hour protocolscan be relaxed for many without compromising PrI development. Causal link was not established between three repositioning interval treatments and primary outcome—PrIs; however, no new PrIs developed. Cueing staff may benefit repositioningimplementation; compliance improved as repositioning interval lengthened.Trial Registration: (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02996331).Date: 16/05/2017

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document