Withholding CPR in the Prehospital Setting

1990 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel J. Stratton
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Care ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Prehospital Setting ◽  
Prehospital Emergency Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Care Community ◽  
Social And Emotional ◽  
Number Of Factors ◽  
Prehospital Emergency ◽  
Law And Science

The expansion of hospices and recognition of living wills have made it necessary for emergency care providers to re-evaluate the appropriateness of universal application of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the field. The prehospital care community is coming to realize that CPR is beneficial only in certain specific situations. Some believe that when CPR is not likely to be beneficial, it should be withheld. Withholding CPR seems to be a simple matter of law and science, but a number of factors complicate the issue, especially in the prehospital setting: What are the definitive signs of irreversible, sudden death? When is the application of CPR futile? What are the responsibilities of the prehospital emergency care provider who announce someone dead? What is the lay public's perception of stopping or withholding CPR? Withholding CPR in this environment is a complicated social and emotional issue as well as a scientific and legal one.

scholarly journals The role of the emergency medical dispatch centre (EMDC) and prehospital emergency care safety: results from an incident report (IR) system

CJEM ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 411-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Mortaro ◽  
Diana Pascu ◽  
Tamara Zerman ◽  
Enrico Vallaperta ◽  
Alberto Schönsberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Care ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Prehospital Setting ◽  
Prehospital Emergency Care ◽  
Incident Report ◽  
Emergency Medical Dispatch ◽  
Emergency Medical ◽  
Dispatch Centre ◽  
Prehospital Emergency

AbstractIntroductionThe role of the emergency medical dispatch centre (EMDC) is essential to ensure coordinated and safe prehospital care. The aim of this study was to implement an incident report (IR) system in prehospital emergency care management with a view to detecting errors occurring in this setting and guiding the implementation of safety improvement initiatives.MethodsAn ad hoc IR form for the prehospital setting was developed and implemented within the EMDC of Verona. The form included six phases (from the emergency call to hospital admission) with the relevant list of potential error modes (30 items). This descriptive observational study considered the results from 268 consecutive days between February and November 2010.ResultsDuring the study period, 161 error modes were detected. The majority of these errors occurred in the resource allocation and timing phase (34.2%) and in the dispatch phase (31.0%). Most of the errors were due to human factors (77.6%), and almost half of them were classified as either moderate (27.9%) or severe (19.9%). These results guided the implementation of specific corrective actions, such as the adoption of a more efficient Medical Priority Dispatch System and the development of educational initiatives targeted at both EMDC staff and the population.ConclusionsDespite the intrinsic limits of IR methodology, results suggest how the implementation of an IR system dedicated to the emergency prehospital setting can act as a major driver for the development of a “learning organization” and improve both efficacy and safety of first aid care.

scholarly journals A Comparison Between Differently Skilled Prehospital Emergency Care Providers in Major-Incident Triage in South Africa

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 575-580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annet Ngabirano Alenyo ◽  
Wayne P. Smith ◽  
Michael McCaul ◽  
Daniel J. Van Hoving
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Emergency Care ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Major Incident ◽  
Prehospital Emergency Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Publication Type ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Prehospital Emergency ◽  
Level Of Training

AbstractIntroductionMajor-incident triage ensures effective emergency care and utilization of resources. Prehospital emergency care providers are often the first medical professionals to arrive at any major incident and should be competent in primary triage. However, various factors (including level of training) influence their triage performance.Hypothesis/ProblemThe aim of this study was to determine the difference in major-incident triage performance between different training levels of prehospital emergency care providers in South Africa utilizing the Triage Sieve algorithm.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study involving differently trained prehospital providers: Advanced Life Support (ALS); Intermediate Life Support (ILS); and Basic Life Support (BLS). Participants wrote a validated 20-question pre-test before completing major-incident training. Two post-tests were also completed: a 20-question written test and a three-question face-to-face evaluation. Outcomes measured were triage accuracy and duration of triage. The effect of level of training, gender, age, previous major-incident training, and duration of service were determined.ResultsA total of 129 prehospital providers participated. The mean age was 33.4 years and 65 (50.4%) were male. Most (n=87; 67.4%) were BLS providers. The overall correct triage score pre-training was 53.9% (95% CI, 51.98 to 55.83), over-triage 31.4% (95% CI, 29.66 to 33.2), and under-triage 13.8% (95% CI, 12.55 to 12.22). Post-training, the overall correct triage score increased to 63.6% (95% CI, 61.72 to 65.44), over-triage decreased to 17.9% (95% CI, 16.47 to 19.43), and under-triage increased to 17.8% (95% CI, 16.40 to 19.36). The ALS providers had both the highest likelihood of a correct triage score post-training (odds ratio 1.21; 95% CI, 0.96-1.53) and the shortest duration of triage (median three seconds, interquartile range two to seven seconds; P=.034). Participants with prior major-incident training performed better (P=.001).ConclusionAccuracy of major-incident triage across all levels of prehospital providers in South Africa is less than optimal with non-significant differences post-major-incident training. Prior major-incident training played a significant role in triage accuracy indicating that training should be an ongoing process. Although ALS providers were the quickest to complete triage, this difference was not clinically significant. The BLS and ILS providers with major-incident training can thus be utilized for primary major-incident triage allowing ALS providers to focus on more clinical roles.AlenyoAN, SmithWP, McCaulM, Van HovingDJ. A comparison between differently skilled prehospital emergency care providers in major-incident triage in South Africa. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(6):575–580.

A systematic review of prehospital telehealth utilization

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 473-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew S Winburn ◽  
Juliana J Brixey ◽  
James Langabeer ◽  
Tiffany Champagne-Langabeer
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Care ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Feasibility Studies ◽  
The United States ◽  
Prehospital Emergency Care ◽  
Positive Trend ◽  
Prehospital Emergency ◽  
Store And Forward ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Future Work

Objective There has been moderate evidence of telehealth utilization in the field of emergency medicine, but less is known about telehealth in prehospital emergency medical services (EMS). The objective of this study is to explore the extent, focus, and utilization of telehealth for prehospital emergency care through the analysis of published research. Methods The authors conducted a systematic literature review by extracting data from multiple research databases (including MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL Complete, and Google Scholar) published since 2000. We used consistent key search terms to identify clinical interventions and feasibility studies involving telehealth and EMS, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results We identified 68 articles focused specifically on telehealth interventions in prehospital care. The majority (54%) of the studies involved stroke and acute cardiovascular care, while only 7% of these (4) focused on telehealth for primary care. The two most common delivery methods were real-time video-conferencing capabilities (38%) and store and forward (25%); and this variation was based upon the clinical focus. There has been a significant and positive trend towards greater telehealth utilization. European telehealth programs were most common (51% of the studies), while 38% were from the United States. Discussion and Conclusions Despite positive trends, telehealth utilization in prehospital emergency care is fairly limited given the sheer number of EMS agencies worldwide. The results of this study suggest there are significant opportunities for wider diffusion in prehospital care. Future work should examine barriers and incentives for telehealth adoption in EMS.

Ethical Conflicts in Prehospital Emergency Care

2006 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 592-607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Sandman ◽  
Anders Nordmark
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Care ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Self Determination ◽  
Prehospital Emergency Care ◽  
Best Interest ◽  
Focus Group Interviews ◽  
Self Identity ◽  
Ethical Conflicts ◽  
Prehospital Emergency ◽  
Group Interviews

This article analyses and presents a survey of ethical conflicts in prehospital emergency care. The results are based on six focus group interviews with 29 registered nurses and paramedics working in prehospital emergency care at three different locations: a small town, a part of a major city and a sparsely populated area. Ethical conflict was found to arise in 10 different nodes of conflict: the patient/carer relationship, the patient’s self-determination, the patient’s best interest, the carer’s professional ideals, the carer’s professional role and self-identity, significant others and bystanders, other care professionals, organizational structure and resource management, societal ideals, and other professionals. It is often argued that prehospital care is unique in comparison with other forms of care. However, in this article we do not find support for the idea that ethical conflicts occurring in prehospital care are unique, even if some may be more common in this context.

scholarly journals Self-Reported Violence Experienced by Swiss Prehospital Emergency Care Providers

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Simon Savoy ◽  
Pierre-Nicolas Carron ◽  
Nathalie Romain-Glassey ◽  
Nicolas Beysard
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Sexual Harassment ◽  
Emergency Care ◽  
Workplace Violence ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Prehospital Emergency Care ◽  
Physical Assault ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Prehospital Emergency

Background. Workplace violence is a serious and increasing problem in health care. Nevertheless, only few studies were carried out concerning this topic and then mainly in English-speaking countries. The objectives were to describe the acts of violence experienced by prehospital emergency care providers (PECPs) in the western part of Switzerland between January and December 2016 and to assess the consequences for subsequent PECPs behaviors. Methods. An observational cross-sectional study, carried out using an online survey, has been sent to all 416 PECPs in the Canton of Vaud, in the western, French-speaking, part of Switzerland. The survey contained items of demographic data and items to assess the type and consequence of violence sustained. This was classified as five types: verbal assault, intimidation, physical assault, sexual harassment, and sexual assault. Results. 273 (65.6%) PECPs participated in the survey. During 2016, workplace violence was reported by 229 survey participants (83.9%). Most declared to be the victim of such violence between one and three times during the year. In all cases of violence described, the patient and/or a relative initiated aggressive behavior in 96% of cases. Verbal assaults were the most common (99.2% of all acts), followed by intimidation (72.8%), physical assault (69.6%), and sexual harassment (16.3%). Concerning physical assault, PECPs were predominantly victims of spitting and/or jostling (50%). After a violent event, in 50% of cases, the PECPs modified their behavior owing to the experience of workplace violence; 82% now wear protective vests, and 16% carry weapons for self-defense, such as pepper sprays. Seventy-five percent changed their intervention strategies, acting more carefully and using verbal de-escalation techniques or physical restraints for violent patients. Conclusions. Workplace violence is frequent and has significant consequences for PECPs. In order to increase their own security, they increased their protection. These results illustrate their feelings of insecurity, which may have deleterious effects on work satisfaction and motivation. Trial Registration. Our article does not report the results of a health care intervention on human participants.

Military Prehospital Emergency Care: defining and professionalising the levels of care provided along the Operational Patient Care Pathway

2018 ◽  
Vol 165 (3) ◽  
pp. 188-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danny Sharpe ◽  
J McKinlay ◽  
S Jefferys ◽  
C Wright
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Emergency Care ◽  
Care Pathway ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
The Body ◽  
Prehospital Emergency Care ◽  
Levels Of Care ◽  
Prehospital Emergency ◽  
The Right ◽  
Care Support

The Defence Medical Services aims to provide gold standard care to ill and injured personnel in the deployed environment and its prehospital emergency care (PHEC) systems have been proven to save lives. The authors have set out to demonstrate, using existing literature, consensus and doctrine that the NHS Skills for Health framework can be reflected in military prehospital care and provides an existing model for defining the levels of care our providers can offer. In addition, we have demonstrated how these levels of care support the Operational Patient Care Pathway and add to the body of evidence for the use of specialist PHEC teams to allow the right patient to be transported on the right platform, with the right medical team, to the right place. These formalised levels allow military planners to consider the scope of practice, amount of training and appropriate equipment required to support deployed operations.

Putting Culture into Prehospital Emergency Care: A Systematic Narrative Review of Literature from Lower Middle-Income Countries

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (05) ◽  
pp. 510-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thanh Tam Tran ◽  
Janice Lee ◽  
Adrian Sleigh ◽  
Cathy Banwell
Keyword(s):  
Health System ◽  
Emergency Care ◽  
Information Exchange ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Prehospital Emergency Care ◽  
Sociocultural Factors ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Prehospital Emergency ◽  
Pathway To Care

AbstractBackground:Prehospital emergency care is cost-effective for improving morbidity and mortality of emergency conditions. However, such care has been discounted in the public health system of many lower middle-income countries (LMICs). Where it exists, the Emergency Medical Service (EMS) system is grossly inadequate, unpopular, and misrepresented. Many EMS reviews in developing countries have identified systemic problems with infrastructure and human resources, but they neglected impacts of sociocultural factors. This study examines the sociocultural dimensions of LMICs’ prehospital emergency systems in order to improve the quality and impact of emergency care in those countries.Methods:Qualitative studies on EMS systems in LMICs were systematically reviewed and analyzed using Kleinman’s health system theory of folk, popular, and professional health sectors. Also, the three-delay model of emergency care – seeking, reaching, and receiving – provided a guiding framework.Results:The search yielded over 3,000 papers and the inclusion criteria eventually selected 14, with duplicates and irrelevant papers as the most frequent exclusion. Both user and provider experiences with emergency conditions and the processes of prehospital care were described. Sociocultural factors such as trust and beliefs underlay the way emergency care was experienced. Attitudes of family and community shaped service-seeking behaviors. Traditional medicine was often the first point of care. Private vehicles were the main transportation for accessing care due to distrust and misunderstanding of ambulance services.Conclusion:The findings led to the discussion on how culture is woven into the patients’ pathway to care, and the recommendation for any future development to place a far greater emphasis on this aspect. Instead of relying purely on the biomedical sector, the health system should acknowledge and show respect for popular knowledge and folk belief. Such strategies will improve trust, facilitate information exchange, and enable stronger healer-patient relationships.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document