scholarly journals Perceptions of Academic Departmental Climate by Men and Women and the Effects of Such Perceptions on Research Productivity

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Kim Quaile Hill ◽  
Patricia Ann Hurley

ABSTRACT We demonstrate how men and women political scientists in PhD-granting departments perceive the professional climates there. We find remarkable differences in how men and women perceive the “cultural” climates of their departments, such as the degree to which it is sexist, but not in how they perceive strictly collegial aspects of climate. We also demonstrate that these patterns characterize the perceptions of men and women at both junior and senior ranks. Contrary to some past research, we also find that climate perceptions do not have a general effect on faculty research productivity. Further, perceptions of high departmental sexism by women scholars does not degrade their research productivity.

1984 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 402-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.Susan Taylor ◽  
Edwin A. Locke ◽  
Cynthia Lee ◽  
Marilyn E. Gist

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 111-124
Author(s):  
Jared S. Moon ◽  
David A. Wood

ABSTRACT Research in accounting education has evolved to include, among other areas, research relevance, faculty research productivity, and the use of journal lists. These topics offer new areas for research, including investigating the benefits and risks of relevant/irrelevant research, how effectively faculty research is evaluated, the potential consequences of using journal lists, and much more. Although these areas have significant and wide-ranging effects on faculty, much more empirical data are needed to inform decision making. This paper highlights these issues and makes suggestions for additional research to help the academy make better decisions by using data-driven research findings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document