scholarly journals The following abstracts were presented as posters at the 2018 NEI Congress

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 175-175 ◽  

The 2018 NEI Congress would like to congratulate the following scientific poster winners:1stPlace:20 - The Need for Speed: Adjunctive Triple Chronotherapy. An Accelerated Intervention in the Treatment of Acute Depression in the Adolescent PopulationDiane Hurd, PMHNP; Mariela Herrera, MD; Nicholas Coombs, MS; Jeannine M. Brant, PhD, APRN, AOCN, FAAN; Eric Arzubi, MD2ndPlace:93 - Practical Outpatient Pharmacotherapy for Alcohol Use DisorderYoungjung Kim, MD, PhD; Laura Hack, MD, PhD; Elizabeth Ahn, MD; Jungjin Kim, MD3rdPlace:95 - Differential Aspects Between Schizophrenia Treatment Approaches: Oral Antipsychotics vs. Aripiprazole Long-Acting InjectableS Arques Egea; E Ros Cucurull; C Iranzo Tatay; C Parro-Torres; RF Palma-Álvarez; E Castrillo; MA Cantillo; P Aznar

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 106-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison Beatty ◽  
Christopher Stock

Abstract Introduction: Approximately 17 million Americans and 300 000 veterans have an alcohol use disorder (AUD). Both oral naltrexone (NTX) and long-acting, injectable naltrexone (LAI NTX) are FDA-approved to treat AUD. LAI NTX is often reserved for patients with adherence concerns due to considerable differences in drug cost and administration requirements. To date, there are no randomized trials comparing efficacy of LAI NTX to oral NTX. This retrospective cohort study compared clinical outcomes in veterans treated with LAI NTX or oral NTX. Methods: Health care utilization in veterans at 1 Veterans Affairs facility treated for AUD with oral NTX and LAI NTX was compared. The primary outcome was 90-day alcohol-related hospital admissions per patient (ARA90). Secondary outcomes included 90-day outpatient clinic and emergency department visits and 30-day alcohol-related admissions (ARA30). Inclusion criteria included first-time prescription of NTX for AUD from January 1, 2015, through December 1, 2015. Veterans receiving concurrent acamprosate or disulfiram were excluded. Results: Seventy-nine patients were included with 65 in the oral NTX group and 14 in the LAI NTX group. The ARA90 was 0.17 for the oral NTX group and 0.64 for the LAI NTX group (P = .06). The oral NTX group had significantly fewer ARA30 than the LAI NTX group (P < .01). Oral NTX also had significantly lower health care utilization for all other parameters. Discussion: Oral NTX was associated with lower health care utilization compared to LAI NTX in this veteran population. This indicates that LAI NTX may not provide additional benefit justifying the cost. This study had several limitations. Randomized trials comparing efficacy between oral NTX and LAI NTX are needed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (8-9) ◽  
pp. 211-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martyna Sawicka ◽  
Derek K Tracy

Background: Psychotic illnesses, such as schizophrenia, are typically enduring and disabling conditions, impacting individual, family, and societal outcomes. Individuals with these face greater vulnerabilities in developing alcohol-use disorder (AUD). Furthermore, the nature of psychoses, often manifesting with paranoia, cognitive impairment, a lack of insight, sub-optimal treatment adherence, and stigma from others, means that they can pose unique treatment challenges when these two conditions comorbidly occur. These challenges mean that the standard literature on the effectiveness of the opioid antagonist naltrexone in AUD does not necessarily translate to this vulnerable population. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we herein systematically reviewed the evidence for naltrexone in individuals with both psychosis and AUD. Overall, there is a paucity of research in this important area, with only nine reports meeting search criteria, only four of which were randomized control trials. Studies compared naltrexone with: placebo, another pharmaceutical agent, or upon changes to baseline drinking behaviour. One study evaluated the long-acting injectable formulation of this drug. Results: Most studies, including the methodologically more robust ones, supported naltrexone’s effectiveness over placebo in terms of reduction in drinking days and numbers of drinks consumed on such days in this cohort. Work comparing naltrexone to other pharmaceutical interventions showed approximate equivalence with disulfiram, and modest superiority over acamprosate. Conclusions: On this limited evidence base, this review endorses the use of naltrexone as both safe and effective in those with both psychotic illnesses and AUD. Several key issues remain to be elucidated. Critically, study designs meant that they were limited to individuals with good engagement with services, and levels of adherence were attained that are unlikely to be replicated in this cohort in real-world settings. Finally, effects of specific psychosis symptomatology, not least paranoia and insight, upon naltrexone use, and the reverse directional potential of ‘double dysphoria’ from an opioid antagonist remain largely unexplored.


2015 ◽  
Vol 76 (10) ◽  
pp. 1359-1365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan I. Green ◽  
Mary F. Brunette ◽  
Ree Dawson ◽  
Peter Buckley ◽  
Amy E. Wallace ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 392-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne E. Leighty ◽  
Elayne D. Ansara

Abstract Introduction In veterans, the prevalence of 12-month and lifetime alcohol use disorder (AUD) is 14.8% and 42.2%, respectively. Alcohol use disorder treatment is often plagued by medication discontinuation with relapse rates being as high as 39% in patients who sought treatment. One proposed benefit of long-acting injectable (LAI) medications is improved adherence. The purpose of this trial was to compare the difference in time to relapse between patients on oral and LAI naltrexone. Methods This study was a retrospective electronic chart review of patients with AUD who were treated with oral or LAI naltrexone at a Veteran's Affairs Medical Center from August 1, 2016, to July 31, 2018. The primary outcome assessed was time to relapse. Secondary outcomes for this study included medication possession ratio (MPR), comorbid mental health diagnosis, substance use, past pharmacological treatment, liver and kidney function, and enrollment in addiction-focused psychosocial therapy. Results Thirty-two patients met inclusion criteria. The median time to relapse was longer for those treated with LAI naltrexone versus oral naltrexone (150.5 days vs 50.5 days, P < .01). The MPR was similar among both groups (P = .47). No significant differences were found between the groups regarding safety outcomes. Discussion Results suggest that LAI naltrexone is associated with increased time to relapse and should be considered as a first-line option for patients. Given the retrospective nature and small sample size of this study, larger, randomized, controlled trials comparing LAI and oral naltrexone head to head would help determine most appropriate treatment for these patients.


2020 ◽  
pp. 203-220
Author(s):  
Megan Lemay

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a common and costly disease. Alcohol withdrawal is a common complication of AUD. Alcohol withdrawal has primarily been managed in the inpatient setting, though evidence supports treatment in the outpatient setting for selected low-risk patients. Benzodiazepines are the gold standard medication class to prevent complications of alcohol withdrawal and may be given in symptom-triggered, fixed-schedule, and loading dose regimens. Medications for the treatment of AUD are effective and underutilized. There are three medications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for AUD: naltrexone (available in short-acting oral and long-acting injectable formulations), acamprosate, and disulfiram. Naltrexone and acamprosate are preferred in most settings due to their efficacy and tolerability. Patients with moderate to severe AUD should be offered medication as part of their treatment plan along with a comprehensive history and physical, behavioral treatment, and mutual goal-setting. It is recommended that medications for AUD are continued for at least 6–12 months or until their risks outweigh their benefits. This chapter reviews the medication management of alcohol withdrawal and AUD in detail.


Author(s):  
Silke Behrendt ◽  
Barbara Braun ◽  
Randi Bilberg ◽  
Gerhard Bühringer ◽  
Michael Bogenschutz ◽  
...  

Abstract. Background: The number of older adults with alcohol use disorder (AUD) is expected to rise. Adapted treatments for this group are lacking and information on AUD features in treatment seeking older adults is scarce. The international multicenter randomized-controlled clinical trial “ELDERLY-Study” with few exclusion criteria was conducted to investigate two outpatient AUD-treatments for adults aged 60+ with DSM-5 AUD. Aims: To add to 1) basic methodological information on the ELDERLY-Study by providing information on AUD features in ELDERLY-participants taking into account country and gender, and 2) knowledge on AUD features in older adults seeking outpatient treatment. Methods: baseline data from the German and Danish ELDERLY-sites (n=544) were used. AUD diagnoses were obtained with the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, alcohol use information with Form 90. Results: Lost control, desired control, mental/physical problem, and craving were the most prevalent (> 70 %) AUD-symptoms. 54.9 % reported severe DSM-5 AUD (moderate: 28.2 %, mild: 16.9 %). Mean daily alcohol use was 6.3 drinks at 12 grams ethanol each. 93.9 % reported binging. More intense alcohol use was associated with greater AUD-severity and male gender. Country effects showed for alcohol use and AUD-severity. Conclusion: European ELDERLY-participants presented typical dependence symptoms, a wide range of severity, and intense alcohol use. This may underline the clinical significance of AUD in treatment-seeking seniors.


Author(s):  
Jennis Freyer-Adam ◽  
Sophie Baumann ◽  
Inga Schnuerer ◽  
Katja Haberecht ◽  
Ulrich John ◽  
...  

Zusammenfassung. Ziel: Persönliche Beratungen können bei stationären Krankenhauspatienten Alkoholkonsum und Mortalität reduzieren. Sie sind jedoch mit hohen Kosten verbunden, wenn aus Public-Health-Erfordernis viele Menschen einer Bevölkerung erreicht werden müssen. Computerbasierte Interventionen stellen eine Alternative dar. Jedoch ist ihre Wirksamkeit im Vergleich zu persönlichen Beratungen und im Allgemeinkrankenhaus noch unklar. Eine quasi-randomisierte Kontrollgruppenstudie „Die Bedeutung der Vermittlungsform für Alkoholinterventionen bei Allgemeinkrankenhauspatienten: Persönlich vs. Computerisiert“ soll dies untersuchen. Design und Methoden werden beschrieben. Methode: Über 18 Monate sind alle 18- bis 64-jährigen Patienten auf Stationen der Universitätsmedizin Greifswald mittels Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) zu screenen. Frauen/Männer mit AUDIT-Consumption ≥ 4/5 und AUDIT < 20 werden einer von drei Gruppen zugeordnet: persönliche Intervention (Beratungen zur Konsumreduktion), computerbasierte Intervention (individualisierte Rückmeldebriefe und Broschüren) und Kontrollgruppe. Beide Interventionen erfolgen im Krankenhaus sowie telefonisch bzw. postalisch nach 1 und 3 Monaten. In computergestützten Telefoninterviews nach 6, 12, 18 und 24 Monaten wird Alkoholkonsum erfragt. Schlussfolgerung: Das Studienvorhaben, sofern erfolgreich umgesetzt, ist geeignet die längerfristige Wirksamkeit einer persönlichen und computerbasierten Intervention im Vergleich zu untersuchen.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document