Comparing treatment plans for stomach cancer: three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), physical wedge-based conformal RT (WB-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Gokcen Inan ◽  
Osman Vefa Gul
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Stomach Cancer ◽  
Organs At Risk ◽  
Left Kidney ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Conformal Radiotherapy ◽  
Conformity Index ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Treatment Plans ◽  
3D Crt

Abstract Objective: The aim of this study was to find the optimal radiotherapy (RT) method using three-dimensional (3D) conformal RT (CRT), physical wedge-based CRT (WB-CRT) and dynamic intensity-modulated RT (D-IMRT) techniques for stomach cancer. Methods: Ten patients with gastric cancer were selected for this study. For each patient, three different treatment plans were generated. 3D-CRT, WB-CRT and IMRT plans were evaluated in terms of dosimetry. Treatment plans were compared with respect to the planning target volume and organs at risk (OARs) volumes including right and left kidney doses (V13, V20 and V28), heart mean and maximum doses, spinal cord maximum doses, dose homogeneity index, conformity index (CI), delivery time and the monitor unit counts for the treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) v25.1 software (IBM Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results: In stomach plans, IMRT showed a significantly lower dose for the left and right kidneys than that of WB-CRT or 3D-CRT (p < 0·05). Compared with WB-CRT or 3D-CRT, IMRT reduced the V28, V20, V13 and mean dose to bilateral kidneys (p < 0·05). IMRT plans indicated better dosimetry for at the Dmean of the liver and heart. Concerning the calculated CI, values for IMRT plans gave significant results than other plans (p < 0·05). Conclusions: IMRT plans provided better protection for the kidneys, liver, heart and spinal cord. For the treatment of stomach cancer, considering the dose to the OARs, IMRT appears to be the most superior technique.

scholarly journals Dosimetric Evaluation of 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy Technique in Postoperative Patients with Gastric Carcinoma: When Is IMRT Really Needed?

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 151-156
Author(s):  
Rakesh Kapoor ◽  
Srinivasa GY ◽  
Namrata Das ◽  
Chinna Babu Dracham ◽  
Divya Khosla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Organs At Risk ◽  
Left Kidney ◽  
Conformal Radiotherapy ◽  
Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Conformity Index ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Anastomotic Site ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Subsequent Comparison ◽  
3D Crt

Background and purpose: Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care for postoperative gastric cancers with high risk features. The purpose of the current study is to do a dosimetric analysis in the postoperative setting by using 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy (3D-CRT) to a total dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. A subsequent comparison with the 3D-CRT and IMRT of other published data is presented.Materials and Methods: Sixty postoperative patients who underwent radiation with 3D-CRT technique were included in this analysis. All patients received concurrent 5-Flurouracil or Capecitabine chemotherapy along with radiation. Radiation plans were analysed in terms of PTV coverage, conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), organs at risk (OARs) and dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters. Results: DVH statistics for PTV: Dmean was 45.2±0.8 Gy, D98 was 42.9 ±1 Gy, D95 was 43.4±0.8 Gy, and D2 was 47.7±1.1 Gy. Mean CI for all plans was 1.23±0.43 and HI was 1.09±0.03. DVH parameters for OARs: right kidney, Dmean = 11.9±5.1 Gy, V18 was 21.5±13.8%, V15 was 27.2±14.9% and left kidney, Dmean was 17.7±5.8 Gy, V18 was 33.5±13.8%, V15 was 43.2±15.5%. Dmean for liver was 27.7±6.4 Gy and V20 was 69.2±15.8%. D195cc for the bowel bag was 36.3±10.8 Gy. Conclusion: The results of this study and subsequent comparison with existing literature suggests that 3D-CRT provides adequate homogenous target volume dose coverage and OAR protection, comparable to IMRT. More than the radiotherapy technique, it was the anastomotic site and the tumor location that determined the OAR doses. 

scholarly journals Comparison between Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy for Their Effectiveness in Esophageal Cancer Treatment: A Retrospective Single Institution Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xing-hua Bai ◽  
Jun Dang ◽  
Zhi-qin Chen ◽  
Zheng He ◽  
Guang Li
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy ◽  
Conformal Radiotherapy ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Three Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy ◽  
3D Crt

Although a large number of influential studies that have been conducted worldwide on locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC) have employed the treatment modality of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), an advanced as well as highly conformal technology known as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has attracted increasing attention from the radiotherapy research community. This is because of the clear advantages of IMRT, including decrease in radiation dose that reaches critical cardiopulmonary organs. These two treatment modalities need to be investigated with regard to their effect on local control rate and patient survival. In addition, related clinical factors also need to be explored. Data from a total of 431 patients with locally advanced EC, who underwent radiation therapy between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2013, were included in the present study. Two hundred and ninety-three patients received 3D-CRT, while 138 patients received IMRT. We constructed propensity score matches to make the two groups be comparable (136 patients in 3D-CRT group and 138 patients in IMRT group. Kaplan–Meier analysis was conducted to evaluate the endpoint of overall survival (OS). A Cox proportional hazards model was employed to analyze the relationship between the associated factors and the outcomes via univariate and multivariate approaches. The mean follow-up period was 36.2 months, and the median follow-up period was 23 months. For the IMRT group, the median OS was 31 months, and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 70.3%, 50.0%, and 42.8%, respectively, while for the 3D-CRT group, the median OS was 22 months, and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 63.2%, 41.0%, and 35.4%, respectively (p<0.05). The univariate analysis revealed that quit drinking, chemotherapy, and concurrent chemotherapy were significant risk factors for the prognosis of EC (p<0.05), as well as the radiation therapy technique used (p=0.052). The multivariate analysis indicated that chemotherapy and quit drinking were independent predictive factors for OS. OS is found to be significantly better in the IMRT group, compared with that of the 3D-CRT group. Even though these outcomes need further validation, IMRT should be considered preferentially as a therapeutic option for EC, in combination with chemotherapy and persuading patients to quit drinking.

scholarly journals Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Hybrid Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy/Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Techniques for Right Breast Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 3884
Author(s):  
Yi-Chi Liu ◽  
Hung-Ming Chang ◽  
Hsin-Hon Lin ◽  
Chia-Chun Lu ◽  
Lu-Han Lai
Keyword(s):  
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy ◽  
Conformal Radiotherapy ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Arc Therapy ◽  
Effective Doses ◽  
Three Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy ◽  
3D Crt

This study aimed to compare different types of right breast cancer radiotherapy planning techniques and to estimate the whole-body effective doses and the critical organ absorbed doses. The three planning techniques are intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT; two methods) and hybrid 3D-CRT/IMRT (three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy/intensity-modulated radiotherapy). The VMAT technique includes two methods to deliver a dose: non-continuous partial arc and continuous partial arc. A thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) is placed in the RANDO phantom to estimate the organ absorbed dose. Each planning technique applies 50.4 Gy prescription dose and treats critical organs, including the lung and heart. Dose-volume histogram was used to show the planning target volume (V95%), homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), and other optimized indices. The estimation of whole-body effective dose was based on the International Commission on Radiation Protection (ICRP) Publication 60 and 103. The results were as follows: Continuous partial arc and non-continuous partial arc showed the best CI and HI. The heart absorbed doses in the continuous partial arc and hybrid 3D-CRT/IMRT were 0.07 ± 0.01% and 0% (V5% and V10%, respectively). The mean dose of the heart was lowest in hybrid 3D-CRT/IMRT (1.47 Gy ± 0.02). The dose in the left contralateral lung (V5%) was lowest in continuous partial arc (0%). The right ipsilateral lung average dose and V20% are lowest in continuous partial arc. Hybrid 3D-CRT/IMRT has the lowest mean dose to contralateral breast (organs at risk). The whole-body effective doses for ICRP-60 and ICRP-103 were highest in continuous partial arc (2.01 Sv ± 0.23 and 2.89 Sv ± 0.15, respectively). In conclusion, the use of VMAT with continuous arc has a lower risk of radiation pneumonia, while hybrid 3D-CRT/IMRT attain lower secondary malignancy risk and cardiovascular complications.

Dosimetric comparison between three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the treatment of different stages of nasopharyngeal carcinoma

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-51
Author(s):  
Mohamed S. Ibrahim ◽  
Ehab M. Attalla ◽  
Mostafa El Naggar ◽  
Wael M. Elshemey
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy ◽  
Conformal Radiotherapy ◽  
Planning Techniques ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Three Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy ◽  
Better Than ◽  
3D Crt

AbstractBackgroundThis work aims to compare the dosimetric performance of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), a relatively available technique in developing countries, to intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the treatment of different stages of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).Materials and MethodsAccording to the diagnostic stages, 40 NPC patients were divided into two equal groups. Three planning techniques such as 3D-CRT, seven-field IMRT (7F-IMRT) and nine-field IMRT (9F-IMRT) were compared. Dose prescriptions of 70 and 66 Gy were delivered in 35 fractions to gross planning target volume (PTV1) and bilateral retropharyngeal carcinoma (PTV2), respectively.ResultsStage I dose data for almost all of the three investigated planning techniques obey the international recommendations. The dose delivered to PTV1 and PTV2 for 3D-CRT and 7F-IMRT are statistically similar, whereas 9F-IMRT is significantly better than 3D-CRT. For organs at risk (OARs), the delivered dose is significantly better for 9F-IMRT compared with the other two techniques, whereas 7F-IMRT is significantly better than 3D-CRT.Conclusions3D-CRT is an acceptable alternative treatment technique for stage I NPC patients in developing countries suffering from the lack of advanced radiotherapy treatment techniques. 3D-CRT and 7F-IMRT have comparable performance in PTVs, while 9F-IMRT is superior in PTVs and OARs.

scholarly journals Pediatric craniospinal irradiation with a short partial-arc VMAT technique for medulloblastoma tumors in dosimetric comparison

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerhard Pollul ◽  
Tilman Bostel ◽  
Sascha Grossmann ◽  
Sati Akbaba ◽  
Heiko Karle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Organs At Risk ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy ◽  
Conformal Radiotherapy ◽  
Dosimetric Comparison ◽  
Pediatric Medulloblastoma ◽  
Treatment Plans ◽  
3D Crt

Abstract Background This study aimed to contrast four different irradiation methods for pediatric medulloblastoma tumors in a dosimetric comparison regarding planning target volume (PTV) coverage and sparing of organs at risk (OARs). Methods In sum 24 treatment plans for 6 pediatric patients were realized. Besides the clinical standard of a 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) treatment plan taken as a reference, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans (“VMAT_AVD” vs. “noAVD” vs. “FullArc”) were optimized and calculated for each patient. For the thoracic and abdominal region, the short partial-arc VMAT_AVD technique uses an arc setup with reduced arc-length by 100°, using posterior and lateral beam entries. The noAVD uses a half 180° (posterior to lateral directions) and the FullArc uses a full 360° arc setup arrangement. The prescription dose was set to 35.2 Gy. Results We identified a more conformal dose coverage for PTVs and a better sparing of OARs with used VMAT methods. For VMAT_AVD mean dose reductions in organs at risk can be realized, from 16 to 6.6 Gy, from 27.1 to 8.7 Gy and from 8.0 to 1.9 Gy for the heart, the thyroid and the gonads respectively, compared to the 3D-CRT treatment method. In addition we have found out a superiority of VMAT_AVD compared to the noAVD and FullArc trials with lower exposure to low-dose radiation to the lungs and breasts. Conclusions With the short partial-arc VMAT_AVD technique, dose exposures to radiosensitive OARS like the heart, the thyroid or the gonads can be reduced and therefore, maybe the occurrence of late sequelae is less likely. Furthermore the PTV conformity is increased. The advantages of the VMAT_AVD have to be weighed against the potentially risks induced by an increased low dose exposure compared to the 3D-CRT method.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document